Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Godrej Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Decided On : Oct-07-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 35, Section 11DD, Tariff Item No.68, Rule 173B, Tariff Item 14F. Meanwhile, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 14F, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 14F, Tariff Item, Tariff Item No.68, section 11A(1, section 173Q(1, Tariff Item 14F., Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 68, section 11A(2, section 4(4)(d)(ii, Tariff Item 14F, Tariff Item 68, section 11D, section 11DD, section 11DD, Section 11DD, Central Excise Act, Chapter, Section 35, section 11D, section 11D of the Act, section 131, the Finance Act, section 11D, section 11B, section 11D(1A, section 11A, Section 11A, section 11A, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 68, section 11-D. Even, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 14F., Tariff Item

PERSON: A.K. Menon, Sridharan, Sridharan, Sirdharan, Mishra, Sridharan, SeraiKella Glass Works V/s. CCE

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 14F., 3, 20,84,955.72, 4, 5., 6., 9, 14, 11-5-2007, 10, 11, 1983(13, 12, 13, 14, 57CC, 6, 15, 16, 17, 1, 1A, 2, 1, 1A, 3, 2, 4, 1, 1A, 3, 1, 1A, 5, 4, 19, 1997(91, 497, 21, 17.9.2002, 161, 68, 22, 5.1, 161, 68, 23, 9

DATE: 1944, 14-5-2003, September, 1982 to March, 1985, about 13th July, 1982, about 8th September, 1982, March, 1985, 14th September, 1982, 24th May, 1983, 1983, 1st July, 1983, 2nd June, 1983,, 7th June, 1985, 17th October, 1988, 17th October, 1988, 17th September, 2002, 24th May, 1983, 2003, September, 2009, 28th September, 1996, three months, 25th June, 2012, 21st August, 2012, 25th June, 2012, 10th December, 2012, 31st December, 2012, 1983, October, 2013, 14th May, 2005, October, 2013, the period 14th, May, 2003, 1944, 1960, 1277, several years, thirty days, thirty days, 1944, 2001, 2002, 2004, 11th May, 2007, 2007, six months, 18, 10th May, 2008, 18, ten days, 1983, 1983, 2003, 2003, the day Section 11DD, 11th May, 2007, October, 2013, 1983, 2003, 14th May, 2003, October, 2013

ORG: CESTAT, CESTAT, Appellant, Appellant, Central Excise, Appellant, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Appellant, the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai II, Rs.20,84,955.72, Rs.20,84,960/- under Rule 173Q(1, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Central Excise (Appeals, Appellant, the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, CESTAT, the Appellate Tribunal, State, SC, Court, Court, Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd., Madhya Pradesh and Ors, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Appellate Tribunal, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, the Central Government - , the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, ELT, SC, the Supreme Court, Appellant, Court, Writ Petition No.1460, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Petitioners, Court, ELT, Court, the Supreme Court, ELT, Appellant, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Tariff Item, Respondents, the Supreme Court, Respondents, Tribunal

ORDINAL: third, 9th, 7th, 7th, first, 7th, 7th

WORK_OF_ART: The Appellant

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, HossseinKasam Dada, Appellant, Appellant, 35-F, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

GPE: assessee, assessee, A.I.R., India, S.C., Assessee

LOC: Respondent, Cenvat

NORP: Central Excise, Central Excise

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //