Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Meera Housing Private Limited Vs. Khatav Makanji and Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-10-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Order VI Rule, Section 202, the Companies Act, Article 29 Rule 1 of the CPC

CARDINAL: 1, 1, one, 2, 1, 4, 1, 524, 3., one, 4, 5., 343, 6., 14, 7., 8, 20, 9, 34, 367, 54, 380, 54, 57, 507, 46, 637, 79, 46, 637, 28, 24, 24-4-51, 29, 130, 10, 11, 12, 13, 3, 5

ORG: Court, Applicant, Court, Applicant, Applicant, the Apex Court, State Bank of Travancore v/s. Kingston Computers India Pvt. Ltd., the Chamber Summons, Court, Plaintiff, Company, the Board of Directors, CPC, the Plaintiffs, Company, Court, All India Reporter Ltd., Order VI Rule, Plaintiff, Defendant No.3, Court, Plaintiff, Court, AIR, BLR, ILR, ILR, ILR, ILR, the Bombay High Court, High Courts, Court, Court, Court, Court, Apex Court, the Apex Court, Company, Company, Company

PERSON: Defendant Nos, Mahadev Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Vasant Mehta, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Bagwe, Anr, Ramchandra Dhondo Datar, Bagwe, Bagwe, Vasant Mehta

DATE: 20th November, 2007, 19th July, 2011, 14, 2011, 20th November, 2007, 27th April, 2009, 15th April, 2009, 1961, 27, 28, 29, 27.4.2009, 28th October, 2014, six weeks, today, six weeks, today

PRODUCT: Order VI

GPE: SB

TIME: the minute

WORK_OF_ART: the Chamber Summons

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //