Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Chief Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Decided On : Dec-11-2014
Court : Mumbai Nagpur
LAW: Section 62
PERSON: Vasanti A. Naik, Rule, Shri Sudame, Kumar Bhasin, Kumar Bhasin, Geetaben Ratilal Patel Versus, Shri Doifode, Shri Sudame
CARDINAL: 1, 2, six, six, five, six, 3., 4, 4, 368, 5., one, four, 29.12.2005, 6, two, 71, only two, two, only two, two, 8, 9, 29.12.2005, only two, two, 18, 29.12.2005, two, 18, 29.12.2005, 29.12.2005, one, 29.12.2005, 16, 29.12.2005, 29.12.2005, 29.12.2005, one, 10, 29.9.2006, 11, 12, 13, Ten Thousand
ORG: the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, Pune, New India Assurance Company Limited as Office, the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, Pune, Court, the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State Bank of Patiala, Versus Vinesh, the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Department of Personnel, Counsel, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 2010, State Bank of Patiala, Versus Vinesh, AIR 2013 SC 3092, District Primary Education, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, AIR 2013 SC 3092, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Counsel, the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, Hon'ble Supreme, Court, the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, the Commissioner, Welfare of Disabled, Court
GPE: no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3
DATE: the year 1989, 17 years, 1995, 1995, 2010, 1996, 1542, 1995, 1995, 1995, today, 1995, 17.3.1998, 1995, a period of, two weeks, 29.9.2006, Rs.10,000/-
NORP: no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3, no.3
PERCENT: 80%, 80%, at least 10%
MONEY: 46 marks, 28 marks, 46 marks, 28 marks, 46 marks, only 28 marks