Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sanjay Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Ministry of Power and Others

Decided On : Dec-22-2014

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

LAW: Section 12A, MLJ 88, Section 12A, the Nagpur Bench, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 by the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Section 12A, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 20, Section 20, Section 141, article 226 of the Constitution.”, Article 226, Section 20, Article 226, Section 20, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 12A, Section 307, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 12A

CARDINAL: 1, 1 and 4, 2, 3, 2., 3., 56/2008, 2134, 795, 2, 247, two, 1, 246, 4., 2, 3, 2134, 2, 3, 2, 5, 6, 532, seven, 1-A, 2, one, 2, 3, 2, 3, one, 9, 786, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 1, 8, 9, 10, 2, 3, 11, 2, more than one, more than one, 12, 13, Seven, 2, Seven, 14, 2, 2, 3, 2, 15, 16, 2134, 17, 6, two, 18, 8, 20-2-1979, 26, 18, 29, 19, 20, 21, one, 2, 3, 20

ORG: Adv, Asstt, the Writ Petition, the State of Maharashtra, the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co., Ltd., the Zonal Office, the Letter of Selection, no.2, Police Station, Duggipar, Gondia, the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, T.S. Vasudavan Nair Vs, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Supp, Bank of Baroda Vs, Industrial Tribunal, Division Bench, the Writ Petition, the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, Court, Coram, N.W. Sambre, Haresh Pandit Chaudhari Vs, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co., Ltd., Court, Pune, Pune, Court, the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, the Bombay High Court, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co., Ltd., L.J. 575, the Writ Petition, Union of India, AIR 1961, the Supreme Court, AIR 1953 SC 210, the High Court, Parliament, the Central Government, Government, the High Court, Court, Bench, Bench, Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, National Textile Corporation Ltd., the Apex Court, Calcutta, Calcutta, the Calcutta High Court, the Division Bench, Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd., AIR 1984, AIR 1985, ONGC, Adani Exports Ltd, Bench, the Superintendent of Police, the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, the Superintendent of Police, A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd., A.P. Agencies, AIR 1989, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Superintendent of Police, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Civil Procedure, Court, Order IX, a Civil Court, Court, the Writ Petition, Bench, Bench, Parliament, no.2, State of Maharashtra, Vidarbha Region, Court, the Bombay High Court, no.2, Bombay High Court, no.2, Bench, no.2, Court, Court, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co., Ltd., L.J. 575, no.2, Bench, the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, the Judicial Magistrate, no.2, no.2, the Supreme Court, no.2, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, the Apex Court, Supreme Court, Court, the Police Station Officer, Bank of Baroda Vs, Industrial Tribunal, the Apex Court, the High Court, the Labour Court, the Sessions Court, the Labour Court, the High Court, the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, Govt, Home Department, no.2, Departments/Agencies, Court, Haresh Pandit Chaudhari, Govt

PERSON: S.V. Purohit, Scheduled Caste, Sadak Arjuni, Sadak Arjuni, Home Deptt, Dhawal Singh, Nagpur Vs, Purohit, Khajoor Singh Vs, Saka Venkata Rao, Purohit, Haribox Swalram, Kumar Basu, Khajoor Singh, Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Caste, Nagpur, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur Vs, Order, Dhawal Singh, Delhi Admn, Sushil Kumar, judgment:- “8, ¦287/1892(1)/पोल-5, Paragraphs 19 to

GPE: Adv., Jalgaon, Pune, no.3, Gondia, Gondia, no.3, no.3, Govt., Mumbai, Gondia, Rajasthan, Gondia, Gondia, no.3, no.3, Gondia, Gondia, Salem, Gondia, Gondia, Govt., India, India, India, New Delhi, Govt, Sadak, Gondia, Gondia, Vidarbha Region, Mumbai, Mumbai, Gondia, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, T.S., Delhi, Mantralaya, Mumbai

DATE: 15th February, 2014, 19th June, 2012, 14th June, 2013, 20th June, 2013, 21st June, 2013, 21st October, 2013, 15th May, 2011, 2009, 11th July, 2013, 15th May, 2011, 15th February, 2014, 1988, 1999, 20080 4, 17th October, 2005, 1999, 2009, 15th May, 2011, 19th June, 2012, 2013, 27th January, 2014, 2010, 1963, 1976, 2004, 1264, 1289, 1994, 2002, 11th July, 2013, 15th May, 2011, 15th February, 2014, 1239, 11th July, 2013, 2010, 2009, 15th May, 2011, 6974, 30th June, 2012, 19th June, 2012, 2013, 27th January, 2014, one year i.e., 1983, 1995, one month, 13th June, 1988, 13th June, 1988, a few years before, a few years, 27th January, 2014, 3253, 2014, today, 01st February, 2014

WORK_OF_ART: Scheduled Caste, Summary Case No, Summary Case No, VSP Acqua Mist Fire Pvt. Ltd., a Writ Petition at Nagpur Bench, The Superintendent of Police, SC, a Writ Petition, VSP Acqua Mist Fire Pvt. Ltd., Summary Case No, Prayer Clause, Copy of this Judgment

PRODUCT: Vs, Bench, Vs, Vs, Vs, Bench, Bench, Bench

LOC: Madras, Govt, Govt, Sushil Kumar, Govt, Govt, Govt

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

TIME: Forty-second Amendment) Act

NORP: no.3, Maharashtra, Indian, Electrician, Maharashtra

FAC: the Principal Seat, Resolution

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //