Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ravindra Yadav Vs. Rashtriya Raksha Karmachari Sangh and Another

Decided On : Feb-20-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 28(1-A, the General Body Meeting, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A):- Power of Industrial Court, Section 28(1-A, the Plaintiff No.2, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A, Section 28(1-A

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3., 2, 2, 15/4/2014, 31/3/2014, one, 2/4/2014, 172, 4, 7, No.2, 4, No.2, 4, two, 2/4/2014, 29/4/2014, 4, 5., 2/4/2014, 6., one, two, two, 8, two, 2/4/2014, 29/4/2014, 9, 4, two, 1, 10, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 1, 1, one, 11, 2, two, 4, 29/4/2014, 12, 2/4/2014, four, four, four, 13, 2, 14

ORG: Court, City Civil Court, the City Civil Court, the Trade Unions Act, Civil Revision Application, the Indian Trade Unions Act, “the, S.C. Suit No.3008, the Registrar of Trade Union, Registrar, Western Naval Command, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Managing Committee, Joint General, the Managing Committee, the Managing Committee, Defendants, Defendants, the Defendant Nos.2, Western Naval Command, the Registrar of Trade Unions, the Plaintiff Union, 29/4/2014, the Plaintiff No.2 Ombir Yadav, the Plaintiff No.2 Ombir Yadav, 29/04/2014, Notice of Motion, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, Notice of Motion, Defendants, the Civil Court, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Defence Authorities, Adjutant General, Commands, Army, the Plaintiffs, the Civil Court, Defendants, the Trial Court, the Civil Court, the Trial Court, the City Civil Court, the Trial Court, the Civil Court, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, the City Civil Court, Civil Revision Application, the Applicants/Defendants Shri Vaidya, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Defence Authorities, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Civil Court, the Industrial Court under Section 28(1-A, Trial Court, the Respondents/Plaintiffs Shri Palshikar, the Industrial Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Defendants, the Civil Court, Registrar, the Civil Court, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Apex Court, BorosilGlass Works Ltd Employees Union, the Apex Court, the Civil Court, the Industrial Court under Section 28(1-A, Civil Revision Application, the Civil Court, –, Trade Union, Trade Union, Trade Union, Registrar, the Industrial Court, the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, Industrial Court, the Registered Trade Union, the Industrial Court, the Trade Union: Provided, the Industrial Court, a Committee of Administration, Union, the Industrial Court, Civil Court, the Industrial Court, Court, Civil Court, the Industrial Court, the Industrial Court, the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, Trade Union, Trade Union, the Civil Court, the Industrial Court, Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Industrial Court, the Industrial Court, the Civil Court, the Industrial Court, Civil Revision Application, the Applicants/Defendants, Court, the Plaintiff No.2 Ombir Yadav, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, Ombir Yadav, Union, Plaintiff, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, the Plaintiff No.1 Union, Co-Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Union, 29/4/2014, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, The Trial Court, Ashok Shinde's, the Apex Court, BorosilGlass Works Ltd Employees Union's, the Apex Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Respondent Nos.1, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Registrar, the Trade Union, Registrar, the Respondent Nos.1, the Civil Court, Legislature, the Civil Court, the Trial Court, the Plaintiffs, Suit, Civil Revision Application, the Civil Revision Application

DATE: 23/12/2014, 1926, 1926, 2014, the age of 18 years, 28/03/2014, Annual, 15/4/2014, Annual, 15/4/2014, 4, 6, 16/4/2014, 19/4/2014, Annual, 15/4/2014, Annual, 15/4/2014, a period of 5 years, 20/11/2014, 3/11/2006, the Defendant No.2, 23/12/2014, 2012, 10/07/2012, 2001, less than six months, 1946, 1946, 22/05/2014, less than six months, 2012, 23/12/2014

PERSON: Greater Bombay, Jogendra Pratap Singh, Jogendra Pratap Singh, Jogendra Pratap Singh, Jogendra Pratap Singh, Jogendra Pratap Singh, 02/04/2014, 02/04/2014, Affidavit, Affidavit, S K Singh, Ashok Shinde, Shri Palshikar, Jogendra Pratap Singh, 2 Shri Palshikar

GPE: Trade Union, Act”, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Reply, Reply

PRODUCT: the Bye-Laws

LOC: the Plaintiff No.2, Paragraph 9, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, the Plaintiff No.2, Single, Single

TIME: the minutes

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //