Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar and Others Vs. Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar and Others

Decided On : Mar-31-2015

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 45-ZA, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 109A, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, Section 39, the Insurance Act, Section 30, the Companies Act, Section 109A, the Companies Act, Section 9.11, the Depositories Act 1996, the Depositories Act, Section 109A, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, the Insurance Act, Section 109A, the Companies Act and Section 9.11, the Depositories Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, the Indian Succession Act, the Depositories Act, the Depositories Act, the Depositories Act, the Nominating Person(s, these Bye Laws, the Nominating Person(s, the Nominating Person(s, the Nominating Person(s, the Nominating Person(s, manner”. 12, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 109A, LRC (Comm) 824, the Companies Act, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 56, Section 39, the Insurance Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, Section 39, the Insurance Act, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39, Section 60(1, Section 39, Section 6, Section 6, Section 8, Section 8(2, the Depositories Act, Section 7, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, Section 8(2, Section 6, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 7, Section 6 of the Act, Section 39, the Insurance Act, Section 6, Section 7 of the Act, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8(2, Section 39, the Insurance Act, Section 8(2, the Hindu Succession Act, Section 39, Paras 13, the Insurance Act, the Banking Regulation Act, the Companies Act, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 45ZA(2, Section 4, Section 30, Section 30, the Indian Succession Act, Section 5, Section 130, the Indian Succession Act, the Indian Succession Act, the Indian Succession Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, Section 58(2, the Indian Succession Act, Section 109A, the Companies Act, the Succession Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, Section 109A, Section 109A and Section 109B of the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, the Succession Act, the Indian Succession Act, Section 61, the Indian Succession Act, the Evidence Act, the Companies Act, the Depositories Act, the Notice of Motion

CARDINAL: 1, two, 2., 112, 3., 4, one, 822, 9, 5, 5, 6, 5, one, 6, one, 6, 9, 8, 1, 23.)and, 18, 6, 8, 143, 22.)and, 1, 8), 24 to 26, 25, 9.11, 26, 9, two, 10, 11, 9.11.7, 9.11, 9.11.1, 9.11.3, 9.11.4, 9.11.5, 9.11.6, 9.11.7, 9.11.8, 3, 3, 13, 14, 3, 9, 44, 874, 10, 1, 11, 2, 1, 12, 1, 13, one, 15, 16, one, 1, 2, 3., transferee, one, 17, 2, 10, 10, 5, 12, 446, 4, 2939, 8, 17, 1, 18, 1, 1, 16, 6, ‘plus, 19, 6, 4, 20, 6, 6, 1, 21, 8, 1, 2, 1, 3, 22, two, 9, 11 to 13, 11, 18, 12, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 13, 2, 23, 10, 14)was, 17, one half, half, 19, half, 25, 9, 4, 14, 1, 59, 427, 4, 355, two, 276, 26, 4, 3, one, two, 15, 15, 27, 10, 45ZA(2, 28, 5, 29, 30, 75, 31, 3, 4, 32, only two, 1, two, ‘avoid, 33, 15, 34, 151, 109B, 165, 136, 2, 36., two, 39, one, one, 40, ‘attesting, 109B, 9, 41, 42, 457

ORDINAL: first, second, 3rd, 3rd, third, 4th, first, 8th, third, third, third, second, 3rd, 6th, second, first, third

PERSON: Salgaonkar, Jayashree Jayant Salgaonkar, Snehal Shah, Nanak Ghatalia, Ghatalia, Karl Tamboly, Salgaonkar, Exhibit, Rajendra Pai, Urmila S. Ghatalia, Nanak S. Ghatalia, Nitin Kokate, Nitin Kokate, Nitin Kokates, Nitin Kokate, Maheshwari, Shah, Tamboly, Sarbati Devi v Smt, Usha Devi,(1984, Paragraphs 14, M. Ismail Faruqi v Union, Coking Coal, a Testamentary Disposition, Shah, Tamboly, Harsha Kokate, Shah, Tamboly, Shah, Shah, Shah, Shah, Shah, Joinery Pvt, Reasons, Bill, Bill, H.R.H. Prince Augustus, Viscount Simonds, V.D.C. v. Mixnams Properties 1964, Reid, Maunsell, Wilberforce, Reids, Maunsell, Shah, Kokateis, Shah, Nominee, Shah, Nominee, Shah, VatticherukuruVillage Panchayat v Nori, Venkatarama Deekshithulu, Supp, 5th Ed, Sarbati Devi v Smt, Usha Devi, Shahs, Uma Sehgals, Shah, N. Khanchandani, Anr, Vidya Lachmandas Khanchandani, Anr, Pai, Ghatalia, Shri Lachmandas, Naraindas Khanchandani, Pai, Ghatalia, Khanchandaniclearly, Reasons, Reasons, Sarbati Devis, Shipra Sengupta, Kokateis, Challammav Tilaga and Ors, Sarbati Devi, Sarbati Devi v., Usha Devi, Kesari Devi v. Dharma Devi, S. Fauza Singh v., Kuldip Singh, Uma Sehgal v. Dwarka, Antonio Joao Fernandes v, Ors.(2010, C. R. 208, N.A. Britto, Manupatra, Justice Britto, Manupatra, L.J. 228)(which, Tamboly, D.R. Dhanuka, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Chander Talwar, Anr, Kumar Talwar, Pais, Talwaris, Anr, Aimai, Statutes, Janki Das, Anr, Anr, Shah, Tamboly, C. R. 705).This, A.P. Deshpande, L. J. 370)Mr, Tamboly, Warerkar, Shah, Tamboly, Pais, Pai, Pai, Pai, Pai, Smriti Basu, Justice Britto, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Antonio Joao Fernandes.)Mr, Brittos, Pais, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Pais, Anr, Ghatalias, Ghatalia, Dayagenin, Ghatalia, Pai, Ram Krishna Ram Nath, HarcharanSingh v Shivrani, Pai, Ghatalia, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Kokateis, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Pai, Ghatalia, Mohammedan, Kokatewould, Pai, Antonio Joao Fernandes, Kokateis

ORG: Counsel for the Plaintiff, Court, The Saraswat Cooperative Bank Ltd and Ors, No.503, The Plaintiffs Notice of Motion No, Mutual Funds, Mutual Funds, the Notice of Motion, the Jayant Salgaonkars, inter alia, IDBI Bank, Suit, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Court the Supreme Court, AIR 1984 SC, KokateCourt, Court, the Supreme Court, Fruit, The Delhi Improvement Trust, AIR 1957 SC 344, AIR 1995 SC 605, 21.)Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, Court, the Testamentary Disposition, the Life Insurance Policy, the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, Society, Society, the Insurance Company, Society, the Insurance Policy, Society, Suit, Plaintiff, Emphasis, KokateCourt, the Supreme Court, SarbatiDevi, the Supreme Court, Court, Kokatecourt, the Supreme Court, this High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, KokateCourt, Bye-Laws, the Beneficial Owner(s, the Business Rules, Nominee, the Nominating Person, Beneficial Owner(s, Participant, the Business Rules, Beneficial Owners, Nominee, the Business Rules, the Beneficial Owner of the securities of the Nominating Person(s, Beneficial Owner, the Business Rules, Account, the Nominating Person, Emphasis, the Supreme Court, UtkalContractors, Ors, The Supreme Court, Act, Parliament, Committees, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Chertsey, Maxwells Interpretation of Statutes, Maxwell this Court, Empress Mills, Municipal Committee, Wardha, Emphasis, Blacks Law Dictionary, Emphasis, IyersJudicial Dictionary, General Insurance Co Ltd, Emphasis, Fruit, KokateCourt, the Supreme Court, Chambers Mid-Century Dictionary, Blacks Law Dictionary, Strouds Judicial Dictionary, Port of London Authority v., Sections 16, Fruit, Delhi Improvement Trust, the Delhi Improvement Trust, Nazul, Court, Government, Government, Trust, Trust, The Supreme Court, AIR 1984, SC, KokateCourt, SarbatiDevi, the Supreme Court, Uma Sehgals, The Supreme Court, Emphasis, the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, the Delhi High Court, CPC, The High Court, Emphasis, KokateCourt, KokateCourt, SarbatiDevi, the Supreme Court, ShriVishin, the Supreme Court, the Government Savings Certificates Act, the Supreme Court, the National Savings Certificate, SarbatiDevi, Khanchandaniwas, the National Savings Certificates, the Government Savings Certificates Act, the National Savings Certificates, Emphasis, Emphasis, the Government Savings Certificate Act, Khanchandaniin, SarbatiDevi, the National Savings Certificates, Legislature, the National Savings Certificates, the Statement of Objects, the National Savings Certificates, Court, National Savings Certificates, The Supreme Court, SarbatiDevi, the Government Savings Certificates Act, the Supreme Court, SarbatiDevi, Khanchandaniwere, SarbatiDevi, Khanchandani.(ShipraSengupta, the Supreme Court, The State Bank of India, Emphasis, ShipraSengupta, ShipraSengupta, the Supreme Court, SarbatiDevi, Khanchandani, the Allahabad High Court, the High Court, the Delhi High Court, Court, SarbatiDevi, Khanchandaniwere, Court, NozerGustad Commissariat v, Central Bank of India, the Supreme Court, Fruit, NozerCommissariat, SarbatiDevi, NozerCommissariat, The Supreme Courts, The Supreme Court, Talwarsaid, Kokatecourt, Khanchandani, Kokateby, the Delhi High Court, LeelawatiSingh, DLT, SarbatiDevi, Aimaiv Awabai Dhanjishaw, Parsi, the Provident Fund, the Provident Fund, Legislature, the Delhi High Court, the Lahore High Court, HardialDevi Ditta, AIR 1928, D. Mohanavelu Mudaliar, AIR 1957 Mad 115, the Kerala High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Delhi High Court, Court, R.D. Dhanuka, ShashikiranAshok Parekh v Rajesh Virendra Agarwal, the Calcutta High Court, Usha Majumdar, AIR 1988 Cal 115)which, SarbatiDevi, Khanchandani, Manupatra, the Calcutta High Court, Bench, the Delhi High Court, Dayagentoo, Supreme Court, ShipraSengupta, New Piecegoods Bazar Co Ltd v Commissioner of, Income Tax Bombay, AIR 1950 SC, Nathuprasadv Singhai Kapurchand, AIR 1962 SC, the Supreme Court, SarbatiDevi, SarbatiDevi, Section39 of the Insurance Act, ShipraSengupta, Talwar, NozerGustad-Commissariat, the Supreme Court, ShipraSengupta, Court, Kokatecourt, KokateCourt, the Supreme Court, Court, SarbatiDevi, ShipraSengupta, Court, ‘statutory, Kokateformulation, the Supreme Court, ShipraSengupta, Court, KokateCourt, KokateCourt, Suit, Chamber Summons No.72 of

GPE: HarshaNitin Kokate, Swati Ghatalia, Counsel, Caveatrix, Salgaonkaror Ghatalia, Kokatewas, Reply, Counsel, Ghatalia, Kokate, Kokate, Kokatealso, Smt, Kokate, Kokate, Kokate, Kokate, Kokate, Kokate, Orissa, Counsel, Halsbury, Smt, Delhi, Khanchandanithough, Kokate, Kokate, Kokate, Delhi, Jamsetji, Salem, Rameshchandra, India, Smt, Khanchandani, Kokatedoes, Khanchandani, Challamma, Kokateview, Khanchandani, Khanchandai, Kokate, Kokatewas, Ghatalia

DATE: 2010, 2014, 1996, 1949, 1956, 1996, today, 1960, 1956, 1994, 2001, 2002, 23.)Then, 1956, 1996, 1925, 1996, 1956, 1999, three years, 1956, 1987, 1957, 1958, 1102, 1975, Page 1098, 1987, 1230, 1401, 2938, 2940, 1932, 1920, 1957, 1984, 1938, 1956, 1996, 8, 1908, 2000, 1959, 1959, 1996, Section 8(2, 24, the day, 1956, two months, today, 20th August 2009, 20th April 2010, about eight months later, just a few months, 2009, 299)on 31st July 2009, 1984, 1984, 1978, 6th April 2010, 2010, about two weeks, October 2010, a few months, 1949, 1956, several months, 1998, 1903, 2009, 2009, 1960, 2012, 1960, 1925, 1956, 1996, 2009, 1956, 35, 109A, 1976, 1073, 1981, 1956, 1996, 37, 38, 1872, 109A, 1996, 2014, 2014, 2014, 16th April 2015

PRODUCT: LR 2014)was, Plaint, this Bye-Law, 1 Ch, 346, ShipraSengupta

WORK_OF_ART: Kokateas Section 9, Nominating Person(s, Nominee, Bye Laws, Nominating Person(s, Nominating Person(s, 4th Edition, Vol, American Laws

LOC: Nominee, Nominee, RamdasShivram Sattur

NORP: Objects, ‘statutory, Khanchandani, Khanchandani, Statute, Statute, Indian, ‘statutory, ‘statutory, ‘statutory, ‘statutory, ‘statutory

PERCENT: 50%, the remaining 50%

LANGUAGE: English, English

TIME: 3:00 pm