Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Deborah Mary Crasto Leclerc Vs. Patrick Oliver Leclerc

Decided On : Apr-10-2015

Court : Mumbai Goa

LAW: Section 311, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 28 of the Act and Rule 6(5, Section 12, Section 397(2, Section 311, Section 28 of the Act, Sections 12, Section 31, Section 12, Section 28 of the Act, Section 12, Section 28, Section 28 of the Act, Section 28(2, Section 28(2, Section 135, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 311, Section 12, Section 23 of the Act, the Evidence Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 4., three, two, two, two, two, 6, two, 22/23, 8., two, 10, 11, two, two, two, 12, two, two, two, 13, 9, 1, 2, 1, two, two, two, 14, 15, two, two, 16, 1, 23, 1973(2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 18, two, 19, 20, 21, 16, 22, 23, 24, 25

PERSON: Rao, Scott Leclerc, Brett Leclerc, Scott Leclerc, Brett Leclerc, Mark Anthony, Scott Leclerc, Brett Leclerc, Scott Leclerc, Scott Leclerc, P.C., Scott Leclerc, Goa, Scott Leclerc, Scott Leclerc, Brett Leclerc, Scott Leclerc, Scott, Shri Lobo, Shri Rao, Cri, Shri Rao, Counsel, Krishna Gopal Gupta, Radhika Gupta, Order XVIII, Order XVIII

ORG: this Revision Application, –, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, the Protection of Women, Magistrate, Magistrate, Brett Leclerc, Court, Brett Leclerc, Court, Airlines, Magistrate, Court, Additional Sessions, Additional Sessions, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Reliance, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, RajaramPrasad Yadav Vs, AIR 2013 SC, Magistrate, Magistrate, Counsel, Magistrate, Counsel, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, L.J. 3095, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Magistrate, Court, the Revision Application, the Criminal Revision Application, Magistrate, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Maharashtra, L.J. 1, Court, inter alia, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Civil and Criminal Procedure, Court, “3-A. Party, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, a Criminal Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, RajaramPrasad Yadav, Court, AIR 2007, The Hon'ble Apex Court, RajaramYadav, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, The Revision Application, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate on 30/04/2015, The Revision Application

DATE: 23/01/2012, 25/06/2014, 19/07/2014, 1746, 2009, 1978, 19/07/2014, 70, 76 of 2010, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 1974

LOC: Consulate, Consulate

GPE: France, P.C., Cr, Cr, P.C., Counsel, Cr, P.C., Bihar, Counsel, Cri, Cr, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Aabida, Cr, P.C., P.C.

PRODUCT: D-55, D-56, D-55, D-56, D-55, D-56, MadhuLimaye Vs, D-55, D-56

FAC: Madhusudan Bhardwaj Vs

NORP: Rules

ORDINAL: first

EVENT: SC 3029

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //