Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Guthemma Kom Fakira Chalvadi Vs. Bhangarya Bista Naik Dasan and Others
Decided On : Dec-15-2014
Court : Karnataka Dharwad
LAW: Section 197, Rule 40, Rule 41, Section 30, Rule 93-A, a Rule 40, Rule 40, Section 4, Rule 40, Section 11, Section 11, the PTCL Act
PRODUCT: Articles 226 and227of the Constitution of India
CARDINAL: 19.9.2005, 1, 2, 19, 29.7.1972, 3., 40, 40, 0:1, 30, 1.1.1979, 4, 1)Â, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, one, 17.10.1974, 1, 417, 17.10.1974, 634, 17.10.1974
QUANTITY: about 8 acres, 11. Act
LOC: Kanthraji, North Kannada District, Madras, Madras, Madras, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes
FAC: Sirsi Taluk
PERSON: Fakira Basavanna Chalavadi, Chalavadi, Hospet Thippanna, another v. Jettappa, Standing Order, Bhagi Hengsu, Rocy Lasrado, Mangalore, Kar
DATE: 20.4.1959, 8.12.2002, 22.3.2003, 3.11 2004, several decades, 1978, 2506, 2887/2004, 1968, 1964, 1956, ten years, 1968, 1969, 1968, 1967, 1966, 17,10.1974, Rule 40, 1969, 1974, 1983, 1.1.1979, 1LR 1991, 2375, 1.i., 1979
ORDINAL: first, third, third, first, third, second, third
WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Castes
ORG: ILR, Hyderabad, State, the Mysore Land Grant Rules, the 'MLG Rules', MLG Rules, Repeal and Savings, Hyderabad, the Madras Board, The MLG Rules, the Karnataka Land Grant Rules, Repeal and Savings - The Karnataka Land Grant Rules, Karnataka Land Revenue, the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, the Karnataka Land Grant (Amendment) Rules, The Government of India, the State Governments, the Supreme Court, ILR
NORP: Rules, Scheduled, Rules, Rules
GPE: Bombay, Coorg District, Bombay, Coorg District, Laxmamma v. State, Karnataka