Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shah Mohammed Anwar Ali, Assam and Others Vs. The State of Assam, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Guwahati and Others

Decided On : Jun-02-2014

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 14, the Foreigners Act, Section 5(1)(a, the Citizenship Act, Section 14, Section 5(1)(a, Section 14, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 9, Section 5(1)(a, Section 14, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 2(b)(ii, Section 5, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 5(1, Section 2(b, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Constitution, Section 5, Section 5, Section 2, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 2(1)(b)(ii, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 9 of the 1955 Act, Section 9 of 1955 Act, Section 5(1)(a, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14

PERSON: Katakey, Guwahati, WP(C, Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi, Guwahati, Kamrup, Bangladeshi, Guwahati, A.B. Choudhury, D. Saikia, Addl, M. Bhagabati, Choudhury, Choudhury, Choudhury, Abdul Khader, Syed Mohd, Khan, Mohd, Ayub Khan Vs, Bhanwaroo Khan, S.B. Vohra, Ahmed Vs, Saikia, Addl, Bangladeshi, Addl, Addl, Addl, Bangladeshi, Addl, Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi, Addl, Addl, Rajeev Gandhi, Bhagabati, Addl, Choudhury, Addl, Addl, Bangladeshi, Addl, Bangladeshi, Abdul Khader, Syed Mohd, Khan, Mohd, Ayub Khan, Rehmatulla, S.B. Vohra, Mukhtar Ahmed

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 4, 2., 2, No.3, No.1, 10.05.1997, 4, 2, 3, 2(two, 4., 5., 6, 2, 8, 2002)4, 346, 191, 9, 1, 03.12.2004, 10, 11, 12, 1986)4, 14, 1, 03.12.2004, 03.12.2004, 15, 16, 1, 17, 1, 03.12.2004, 1, 1, 18, 19, 2, 20, 21, 10.05.1997, 1, 1, 22, 1, 1, 2, 23, 2, 24, 25, 26, 27

GPE: WP(C, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Guwahati, No.1s, India, India, Shylet, East Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, India, India, Kamrup, India, India, Karimganj, India, India, Sr., Sr., Bangladesh, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, Sr., Mukhtar, India, India, India, India, India, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, India, Bangladesh, India, India, Sr., Sr., India, India, India, India, India, India, India, East Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, India, India

LOC: Single, Govt, Govt, Central Govt, Single, Govt, Govt, Single, Govt, Govt, Govt, Single, Govt, Single Judge, Single Judge, Madras, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Govt, Govt, Single, Single, Central Govt, Single Judge, Govt, Govt, Central Govt, Govt, Single Judge, Single, Single

ORG: Nos.1, the State Government, Nos.3, Nos.1, Shah Mohammad Aminul Islam, Jakia, the Government of Bangladesh, Visa, Visa, Visa, Nos.3, Panbazar P.S. Case, G.R. Case No.2649/1998, Visa, Nos.1, Judicial Magistrate, Guwahati, Ministry of Home Affairs, The Union of India, the Ministry of Home Affairs, The State of Assam, Visa, the State of Assam, the State of Assam, the Union of India, Bangladeshi, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, State of Andhra Pradesh Vs, AIR 1961, The Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs, AIR 1962 SC, AIR 1965, State, U.P. Vs, AIR 1971, National Human Rights Commission Vs, Union of India, Union of India, Allahabad High Court, U.P., AIR 1965, Allahabad, Visa, un, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Visa, the Election Commission, Court, the Apex Court, Bhagwati Prasad, un, the State of Assam, the District Collector, Court, Nos.1, National Human Rights Commission, Chakma, the State of Arunachal Pradesh, the Apex Court, State, Chakma, the State of Arunachal Pradesh, Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi, Court, Visa, Visa, Court, Court, Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, the Central Government, the Apex Court, Bhagwati Prasad Dixit, the Allahabad High Court, The Apex Court, S.B. Vohra, Court, Court, the Central Government, Visa, G.R. Case No.2649/1998, the State of Assam, Visa, Visa, Singe, Visa, Court

DATE: 1946, lapse of many years, 1955, the month of September, 1991, the month of March, 1992, No.4, 30.12.1991, the month of November, 1996, 21.03.1998, 04.07.1998, 31.08.1998, 27.09.1999, 11.05.1997, 10 days, 11.06.1997 to 11.07.1997, 05.07.1997 to 04.09.1997, 21.09.1997, 3(three) months, so many years, 1467, 1778, 2004, 5 years, so many years, 2005, 2013, 78. 13, 2004, 2004, 5 years, 2004, 7 years, 31.08.1998, 2004, 2004, 2004, 1964, about 2½ decades, the year 2005, 31.08.1998, a period of, 5 years, 1950, the year 2005, 2005, 5 years, 21.03.1998, long 16 years

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, 1996)1 SCC 742, 2004)2 SCC 150

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first

EVENT: the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: The Superintendent of Police

FAC: India –

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //