Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Shah Mohammed Anwar Ali, Assam and Others Vs. The State of Assam, Represented by the Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Guwahati and Others
Decided On : Jun-02-2014
Court : Guwahati
LAW: Section 14, the Foreigners Act, Section 5(1)(a, the Citizenship Act, Section 14, Section 5(1)(a, Section 14, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 9, Section 5(1)(a, Section 14, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 2(b)(ii, Section 5, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 5(1, Section 2(b, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Constitution, Section 5, Section 5, Section 2, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 2(1)(b)(ii, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5(1)(a, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 5 of the 1955 Act, Section 9 of the 1955 Act, Section 9 of 1955 Act, Section 5(1)(a, Section 14, Section 14, Section 14
PERSON: Katakey, Guwahati, WP(C, Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi, Guwahati, Kamrup, Bangladeshi, Guwahati, A.B. Choudhury, D. Saikia, Addl, M. Bhagabati, Choudhury, Choudhury, Choudhury, Abdul Khader, Syed Mohd, Khan, Mohd, Ayub Khan Vs, Bhanwaroo Khan, S.B. Vohra, Ahmed Vs, Saikia, Addl, Bangladeshi, Addl, Addl, Addl, Bangladeshi, Addl, Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi, Addl, Addl, Rajeev Gandhi, Bhagabati, Addl, Choudhury, Addl, Addl, Bangladeshi, Addl, Bangladeshi, Abdul Khader, Syed Mohd, Khan, Mohd, Ayub Khan, Rehmatulla, S.B. Vohra, Mukhtar Ahmed
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 4, 2., 2, No.3, No.1, 10.05.1997, 4, 2, 3, 2(two, 4., 5., 6, 2, 8, 2002)4, 346, 191, 9, 1, 03.12.2004, 10, 11, 12, 1986)4, 14, 1, 03.12.2004, 03.12.2004, 15, 16, 1, 17, 1, 03.12.2004, 1, 1, 18, 19, 2, 20, 21, 10.05.1997, 1, 1, 22, 1, 1, 2, 23, 2, 24, 25, 26, 27
GPE: WP(C, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Guwahati, No.1s, India, India, Shylet, East Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, India, India, Kamrup, India, India, Karimganj, India, India, Sr., Sr., Bangladesh, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, Sr., Mukhtar, India, India, India, India, India, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, India, Bangladesh, India, India, Sr., Sr., India, India, India, India, India, India, India, East Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Bangladesh, Bangladesh, India, Bangladesh, India, India, India
LOC: Single, Govt, Govt, Central Govt, Single, Govt, Govt, Single, Govt, Govt, Govt, Single, Govt, Single Judge, Single Judge, Madras, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Govt, Govt, Single, Single, Central Govt, Single Judge, Govt, Govt, Central Govt, Govt, Single Judge, Single, Single
ORG: Nos.1, the State Government, Nos.3, Nos.1, Shah Mohammad Aminul Islam, Jakia, the Government of Bangladesh, Visa, Visa, Visa, Nos.3, Panbazar P.S. Case, G.R. Case No.2649/1998, Visa, Nos.1, Judicial Magistrate, Guwahati, Ministry of Home Affairs, The Union of India, the Ministry of Home Affairs, The State of Assam, Visa, the State of Assam, the State of Assam, the Union of India, Bangladeshi, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, State of Andhra Pradesh Vs, AIR 1961, The Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs, AIR 1962 SC, AIR 1965, State, U.P. Vs, AIR 1971, National Human Rights Commission Vs, Union of India, Union of India, Allahabad High Court, U.P., AIR 1965, Allahabad, Visa, un, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Visa, the Election Commission, Court, the Apex Court, Bhagwati Prasad, un, the State of Assam, the District Collector, Court, Nos.1, National Human Rights Commission, Chakma, the State of Arunachal Pradesh, the Apex Court, State, Chakma, the State of Arunachal Pradesh, Bangladeshi, Bangladeshi, Court, Visa, Visa, Court, Court, Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, the Central Government, the Apex Court, Bhagwati Prasad Dixit, the Allahabad High Court, The Apex Court, S.B. Vohra, Court, Court, the Central Government, Visa, G.R. Case No.2649/1998, the State of Assam, Visa, Visa, Singe, Visa, Court
DATE: 1946, lapse of many years, 1955, the month of September, 1991, the month of March, 1992, No.4, 30.12.1991, the month of November, 1996, 21.03.1998, 04.07.1998, 31.08.1998, 27.09.1999, 11.05.1997, 10 days, 11.06.1997 to 11.07.1997, 05.07.1997 to 04.09.1997, 21.09.1997, 3(three) months, so many years, 1467, 1778, 2004, 5 years, so many years, 2005, 2013, 78. 13, 2004, 2004, 5 years, 2004, 7 years, 31.08.1998, 2004, 2004, 2004, 1964, about 2½ decades, the year 2005, 31.08.1998, a period of, 5 years, 1950, the year 2005, 2005, 5 years, 21.03.1998, long 16 years
PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, 1996)1 SCC 742, 2004)2 SCC 150
ORDINAL: first, second, first, first
EVENT: the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act, the 1955 Act
NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian
WORK_OF_ART: The Superintendent of Police
FAC: India â