Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Pankaj Samundre Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Decided On : Jan-06-2015

Court : Chhattisgarh

LAW: Section 34(2, Section 438, Section 59­A, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, Section 38, Section 59 of the Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 59, Section 438 of the Code, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Article 21, Section 438, Section 59­A, Section 438

CARDINAL: 1, 1915”, 2., 17.28, 3, 4., 17.28, 1, 17.28, 5, 5., 6., 17.28, 24.11.2013, 34, 1, 2, less than twenty thousand, two, less than twenty thousand, two, 2, 1, five, 8, 1, five, 9, 2004(4, 205(DB, 34, 34, more than 50, 50, 50, 2, 11, 2013(4, 139, 17.28, 13., 14

PERSON: Crime No.324/2014, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, Bulk, Rajnandgaon, wintnery;or, Kumar Lahria, Chaturvedi, Jan Ranjan Das, Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab, Ram Krishna, Rajamani, Rajamani

GPE: Cr, P.C., Dongargarh, Hansaria, ST, ST, Kerala

ORG: Suraj, Suraj, Shri Awadh Tripathi, Shri Neeraj Jain, Govt, State, Suraj, Suraj, Suraj, Yuvraj Motors, FIR, Suraj, Court, Court, Naresh, Legislature, the State of M.P., State, the Apex Court, Terrorist Activities, Disruptive (Prevention) Act, Court, the Apex Court, SC, the Apex Court, SC, Court, FIR, FIR, Court, Lordship, Supreme Court, the Investigating Agency, Naresh Kumar, Suraj, FIR, the State of Chhattisgarh

DATE: 1915, 1915, 1915, 1915, 1915, less than six months, two years, less than one year, five years, 1973, 1974, 1915, 1915, noon day, 34, 1994, 1987, 1989, arranged.” 12, 1915, 1915

ORDINAL: first, second, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //