Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rakesh Baban Borhade Vs. the State of Maharashtra and anr Etc.Etc.

Decided On : Nov-19-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 34, Act 25 of 2005, Section 438

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, SLP, MAHARASHTRA &, ANR, Order, the Bombay High Court, the High Court, IPC, the Magistrate u/s 156, MOU, M/s Vimal Builders, MOU, Directors, The Sessions Court, the High Court, Alpha Omega Home Fund Pvt, MOU, SLP, MOU, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Siddharam, State of, Maharashtra and Ors, Court, Siddharam, MOU, MOU, M/s. Siddhivinayak Enterprises, M/s. Siddhivinayak Enterprises, the Registry of the Supreme Court, Court, MOU

DATE: 2446-2447, 3527-3528/2014, 2006, 2005, April 2013, November 2010, 2011, 31.12.2007, Rs.25,000/-, November 19, 2014 ----------------------- 7

PERSON: Appellant Versus STATE, Vora, Rajnikant N. Parekh, Directors, Suresh V. Vora, Rajnikant N. Parekh, Ravindra Shrivastava, Shekhar Naphade, P.C., Satlingappa Mhetre, Satlingappa Mhetre’s, Gopala Gowda

CARDINAL: 1.4.2014, two, 420, 406, 423, 424, 3, 21.12.2005, seven, seven, 1.4.2014, 21.12.2005, seven, 283, 21.12.2005, 1, 1, 1, 1A, 1B, 1, 1, 21.12.2005, 3.2.2005, 9.5.2014, one, one, one, two, one, one, 21.12.2005

GPE: P.C., Cr, New Delhi

WORK_OF_ART: a Memorandum of Understanding

ORDINAL: second, second, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //