Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rashda Siddiqui Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-viii, New Delhi and ors.

Decided On : Aug-26-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Income Tax Act, Section 2, Section 143, Section 264, the Finance Act

PERSON: W.P.(C, Balbir Singh, Abhishek Singh, BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE, SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT, Act‟).2, Rs.34, Faiz Murtaza Ali v. Commissioner, Faiz Murtaza Ali, Usha Devi, decision:“11

PRODUCT: RASHDA SIDDIQUI Petitioner

ORG: NEW DELHI & ORS, the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264, following:“(ii, Court, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, CIT v. H H, Court, Assessing

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 25.03.2013.4, 103, 231, 8

DATE: 1961, the year ending 31.03.2006, 14, year 2006-07, 23.01.2012, the assessment year 2006-07, 2007, 2014, 1976, 2001, 1998, two weeks, today, three months, today

EVENT: the Assessment Year 2006-07, 01.04.2008, 01.04.2008

GPE: Rs.75,852/-, Himatlal C. Valia v., Faiz Murtaza Ali, Faiz Murtaza Ali

MONEY: 248 ITR262(Guj

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //