Komal JaIn Vs. Union of India and anr.

Decided On : Mar-24-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 127B of the Customs Act, Section 124, Section 111 of the Act, Section 127C of the Act, Section 127B, Section 28AB of the Act, Section 127B, Section 127B, Section 127B, Section 127B, Section 127B of the Act:“SECTION127, the Customs Tariff Act, section 110, Section 127B of the Act, Section 127B., Section 127B, Chapter-XIVA, Chapter XIVA, Chapter XIVA, Section 127B, Section 127B., Section 127B, Chapter XIV-A, Chapter XIV-A, the Customs Act, the Indian Penal Code, Chapter, Chapter XXV, the Bill of Entry/Shipping Bill, Section 127B, the Customs Act, Section 127, Section 127(A, Section 127, Section 127B, Section 127B, Section 127B, section 127B, Section 127B, Section 127A(b, the Income Tax Act, Section 245-C, Section 245-C, Section 245D(1A, the Income Tax Act, Chapter, Section 245D, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 245D, Section 127B of the Customs Act, Section 127B, Section 127B., Section 127B, Section 127B., Section 245D, the Income Tax Act, the Customs Act, the Income Tax Law, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 127B., Section 127B, Section 28AB, Section 127B, Section 124, Section 125, the Customs Act, Page 19 Customs Act, Chapter XIVA, Section 28AB, Section 28, Section 28AB, Section 28(b, Section 28AB, Section 28, Section 28, Section 28 and Section 124/125, the Customs Act, Section 124, Section 28, Section 125(1, Section 125(2, Section 28, the Section 125, Section 124, Section 28, Section 28, Section 28AB, Section 124/125, Section 28, Section 124, Section 124, Section 28, Section 127B., Section 28AB, Section 28, Section 124/125, Section 28(b, Section 124, Section 28AB, Section 28AB, Section 125, Section 28, Section 124, Section 28AB, Section 28AB, Section 124, Section 127B, Section 28AB, Section 127B

ORG: DECIDED, UNION OF INDIA & ANR, DRI, JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR, W.P., Customs, Central Excise Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, Jagdish Cancer and Research Centre, W.P., Page 2 Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, W.P., the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, W.P., the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, W.P., Commission, Collector of Customs v. Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission, Customs, the Bombay High Court, Union of India, Hoganas India Ltd & Ors 2006, W.P., The Bombay High Court, the Settlement Commission, Court, Applicant, the Customs Department, Applicant, the Government W.P., the Custom Authorities, Parliament, a Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, The Settlement Commission, Applicant, the Settlement Commission, the Indian Renal Code, Applicant, the Settlement Commission, W.P., the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., Department, Court, Customs, the Settlement Commission, Court, Commission, Court, Tribunal of limited jurisdiction, Commission, Court, W.P., the Settlement Commission, Court, Customs Authorities, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, Commission, Court, the Settlement Commission, W.P., Parliament, Supreme, Income Tax, Kuldeep Industrial Corporation v. Income Tax Officer, the Supreme Court, the Settlement Commission, Express Newspapers, the Madras High Court, Income Tax, Commission, W.P., Commission, Kuldeep Industrial Corporation, the Supreme Court, W.P., the Settlement Commission, Kuldeep Industrial Corporation, the Bombay High Court, W.P., Applicant, the Settlement Commission, Court, Single Judges, Karnataka High Courts, the Bombay High Court, Court, the Settlement Commission, W.P., Court, the Supreme Court, Jagdish Cancer and Research, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, The Settlement Commission, The Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., W.P., the Settlement Commission, Court, Cancer and Research, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Jagdish Cancer and Research, W.P., the Settlement Commission, Jagdish Cancer and Research, the Settlement Commission, W.P., the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., the Settlement Commission, the Settlement Commission, W.P., Court, the applicability of Section 123 of the Act, the Settlement Commission, Court

DATE: 03.2014 +, 1962, 6th September, 2013, 2001, 1985, 61 of 1985, 1975, 51 of 1975, the 1st day of June, 2007, a period of, thirty days, the 1st day of June, 2007, 30 days, the initial period of, 30 days, 2002, 2006, 2013, 127(B, 1994, 1961, 1961, today, under Section 28

PERSON: C. Hari Shankar, S. Sunil, Sachin Datta, Niti Arora, Gopaljee, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE, S.RAVINDRA BHAT, A. Mahesh Raj, Chapter XIV-, XXX10, Madras, Express Newspapers, S. RAVINDRA BHAT

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 1, two, 132, four, 1, three, 4, 123, 1A, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, one hundred and, 3, 1, 4, 1, 6, Two, 6, 139, 195, 199, 8, 9, one, 11, 10.The, 292, 127, 127, 12, 3, 11.As, 12.The, 1, 14, 2, two, 1A, 15, 13.A, 16, 17, 14.For, 18, 16.The, 20, 17.Learned, 1, 1, two, 21, 2, 125, 22, 19.Neither, two, 23, one, one, one, 24, 22.For, 2014, 25

GPE: India, India, India, misclassification.42, Bombay, India, follows:“19, Hoganas, parties‟

QUANTITY: 36565.33 grams

PERCENT: 36.50%

ORDINAL: first, first, secondly, third, first, second, first, first, first, first, third

PRODUCT: Commission‟s, Commission‟s

WORK_OF_ART: Settlement of Cases

LOC: Madras, Settlement Commission‟s

NORP: Indian, Jadish

FAC: Sections 28