Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S New Era Industries Vs. M/S Star Alubuild Pvt Ltd and anr.

Decided On : May-26-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Order 39 Rules 1, Order 39 Rule 4, Order 39 Rules 1 & 2, Order 39 Rule 4, Order 39 Rules 1, Order 39 Rule 4

GPE: NEW DELHI +, CS(OS, I.A., I.A., I.A., I.A., Spain, AGrade, Ring Road, New Delhi, Spain, Delhi, PO, I.A., I.A., I.A., CS(OS, India, New Era.6

DATE: 15869/2013, 20141/2013, May, 2014, May,, 15869/2013, 20141/2013, 15869/2013, 20141/2013, the year 2012, 12.11.2012, 24.8.2012, 15.12.2012, 17599, 20456, 20335, 38055, 2013, 2007, 2013, 7 days, 1998, 20141/2013, 15869/2013, 20141/2013, 2006, 1997, 2007, 2007, Para 29, 1997, 1963, 1996, 1994, 37, 38055, 24.8.2012, 24.8.2012

CARDINAL: 2, 6, 26, 1, 24.8.2012, 2, 18.8.2012, 18.8.2012, 18.8.2012, 13.4.2013 to 10.10.2013, 18.8.2012, 4.1.2013, 9.1.2013, 9.1.2013, 9.1.2013, 23.1.2013, 18.8.2012, 7.3.2013, 7.3.2013.6, 2400, 29.5.2013, 2400, 2400, 23.8.2013, 2400, 2400, 5, 19, 169, 11, 197, 26, four, 2, 12, 3(a, 3, 13, 3(a, 3(c, 2400, 3(a, 3(c, 2400, 9.1.2013, 73, 147, 18.8.2012, 2400, 2400, 2400, two, 24, 2400, 2400, 2400, 12, 22, 2, two, 1, 9, 14, 9, 177, 22, 22, 30, 12, only two, two, 31, 3(a, 3, 2400, two, 3(a, 3, two, two, 2, 5, 1, 12, 14, 2400, 2400, one, 2500, 2400, 2500, one, 38, 2400, 23.1.2013, 0.55, 1,72,10,793, 2, 5145.08, 2400, 2400, 2400, 23.1.2013, 2400, 2

ORG: CPC, CPC, M/S STAR, AGM, CPC, Plaintiff, no.1, FAVETON AQUA Terracotta, Delhi International Airport Authority Ltd., Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Larsen & Toubro, P.O. No.PUR/001/ATC/2012-13, FAVETON AQUA Terracotta, Indian Bank, A-7, VAT, ATD, Bureau Veritas, Dimension Inspection and Visual Inspection, 25.3.2013, Bureau, the Larsen & Toubro, the Larsen & Toubro, Larsen & Toubro, no.1, the Larsen & Toubro Ltd.8, the Larsen & Toubro, Delhi International Airport Authority Ltd., the Larsen & Toubro, Delhi International Airport Authority Ltd., Reliance, the Larsen & Toubro, State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs, State Bank of India & Ors, Court, Reliance, See Synthetic Foams Ltd., Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. & Anr, Satluj Jal Nigam Ltd., Dwarikesh Sugar Industries, the Swiss Court, GAFTA, Reliance, Gayatri Projects Ltd., Bituminous Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr, CPC, the Bank Guarantee, the Appendix-A, Appendix-A, New Era, Star Alubuild, Appendix-A, no.1, Appendix-A, no.1, the Division Bench Judgment, State Trading Corporation of India Ltd (Supra, Gayatri Projects Ltd., Bituminous Products Pvt. Ltd, Reliance, P.D. Alkarma Pvt. Ltd., Court, CPC, Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Facade System, DIAL Airport Project, Area Control Centre, TBB, Air Traffic Control (ATC, Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Court, no.1, Larsen & Tubro Ltd., Court, Vendor, Vendor, Emphasis, Vendor, the third party, Court, Larsen & Toubro Ltd., Larsen & Toubro Ltd., CPC, CPC, the Supreme Court of India, No.1906-2013, BSES Limited, Reliance Energy Ltd., Fenner India Ltd., Bank, U.P. State, V. Sumac International Ltd., U.P. State, Court, Himadri Chemicals Industries Ltd. Vs, Coal Tar Refining Company, the Apex Court, Bank Guarantee or Letter of Credit, Bank Guarantee, a Letter of Credit, Bank, Bank Guarantee, Credit.29, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantees, Letters of Credit, Bank Guarantee or Letter of Credit, Bank Guarantee, a Letter of Credit, National Heavy Engg, Coop, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, U.P. State Sugar Corporation Vs, Sumac International Ltd., Supreme Court, Appendix-A, Appendix-A, Larsen & Toubro Ltd.).36, Court, State of Orissa & Ors, Delhi Administration, Indian Bank, Satyam Febres, Naidu, the Bank Guarantee of Rs.32,79,375/-, 20.9.2013, LD, the Bank Guarantee, the Bank Guarantee, 20.9.2013, Court, LD, VAT, Bureau Veritas, New Era, Bureay Veritas, New Era.4, New Era, Emphasis, Bureay Veritas, Court, Court, Bureay Veritas, CPC, CPC

PERSON: Manish Kaushik, Tanuj Khurana, Gaurav Malik, Kapil Dahra, Order XXXIX Rule 4, Rs1,63,96,875/-, no.1 @, Delhi, Simplex Concrete Piles, Kaushik, Kaushik, Manish Kaushik, no.1, Canara Bank, no.1, Terracotta Tiles, Khurana, Purchase Order, Purchase Order, Tanuj Khurana, Khurana, Anr, Sugar Corpn, Sugar Corpn, Beneficiary, Mahatama Gandhi Sahakra Sakkare Karkhane Vs, Anr, Harapriya Bisoi AIR2009SC2991, Vimla, Jagannath, plaintiff.14, Shri Mithilesh, Aman, mm, -2 mm, mm, -1 mm, Asim Gupta, J MAY26 2014

PRODUCT: no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, specification.15, no.1, no.1, Rs.8.0, no.1, no.1, Thirty Two, Thirty Two, no.1, -1 mm

LOC: Europe

PERCENT: 10%, 35%, 45%, 45%, 12.5%, 45%, 20%, 45%, 45%, 10%, 35%, 45%, 45%, 45%, 45%, 10%, 25%, 45%, 45%, 45%, 45%, 12.5%, 45%

ORDINAL: third, first, first, first, first, second, first, second, second, first, Secondly, second, third, first, second, first, third

WORK_OF_ART: the Bureau‟

QUANTITY: approximately 2 mm, 2 mm, 242 mm, 2 mm

FAC: Delhi International Airport, Tower Base Building

NORP: same:“12, No.of, New Era.3

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //