Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Virudhunagar District Bus Owners Association, Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,

Decided On : Oct-31-2014

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 2(2, the Indian Tolls Act, the Advocates Act, Section 2(2, the Indian Tolls Act, the Indian Tolls Act, Article 30(1, Article 30(1, Article 30(1, the Indian Tolls Act, the State Amendment to Section 2(2, the Tolls Act, Section 2

ORG: MADRAS, HONOURABLE, R.MAHADEVAN W.P(MD)No.6216, Pravin Sarvin Complex, Collectorate Post, Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration, Madurai Corporation, Madurai, Court, Municipal Administration, Association, Association, Additional Govt, Madurai District Bus Owners Association, Madurai, Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration, Madurai Corporation, Madurai, Court, Municipal Administration, Association, Association, Additional Govt, Municipal Administration, Association, Associations, Mattuthavani, Madurai, Madurai, Municipal Administration, Corporation, Court, Court, Municipal Administration, Court, Court, Corporation, Government, Corporation, Government, Municipal Administration, Municipal Administration, Corporation, Government, Court, Court, Government, Government, the State Government, Government, Court, Court, Court, the Municipal Corporation, the High Court, Court, the Municipal Corporation, Court, B. Point B, Vide Upen, Ritesh, U.P., SCC677.&quot, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Bar Council of Kerala, Court, Court, Coal India Ltd., N.V.S., Furest Day Lawson Ltd., Jindal Exports Ltd., the Supreme Court, Union of India, State of, MSK Projects India, State of Uttar Pradesh, Delhi Development Authority, Joint Action Committee, Allottee of SFS Flats, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Ltd., Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Status Spinning Mills Limited, Godavari Sugar Mills Limited, xvii) Bar Council of Maharashtra and, Ritesh, U.P., School v. Government of, Court, Sugar Factory Ltd., v. Union of India, University of Burdwan, District Bus Owners Association v. Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Municipal Administration, Government, Municipal Administration, Court, Government, Madurai Corporation, Corporation, Municipal Administration, Department, 31.1.2011, Corporation, Municipal Administration, Department, 31.1.2011, Madurai Corporation, Government, the Municipal Corporation, School v. Government of, District Bus Owners Association v. Government, The Hon?.ble Division Bench, School v. Government of, Paragraph (135, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Government, Committee, Paragraph, Government, Paragraph, Government, Court, State, Haryana Vs, Ranbir, Rana, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Apex Court, ADM, KSRTC Vs, Girnar Traders Vs, Maharashtra and Others, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, Court, the Hon?.ble Division Bench, Court, Court, Government, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Government, necessary.18, Coal India Ltd., Ritesh, U.P., Delhi Development Authority, Joint Action Committee, Allottee of SFS Flats, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Ltd., the Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, Court, Corporation, the Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund, Corporation, Corporation, State of U.P v., MSK Projects India (JV) Limited v. State of, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Status Spinning Mills Limited, State, State, State, Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Shri Malaprabha Coop, Sugar Factory Ltd., v. Union of India, The Hon'ble Apex Court, Counsel, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Ashok Kumar Das, University of Burdwan, Court, Court, Court, Godavari Sugar Mills Limited v. State of Maharashtra, Court, Court, Court, Municipal Administration, Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration, Madurai Corporation, Madurai

CARDINAL: 10.2014, 2011, 2, 626 002, 600 009, 2.The, 625 002, 31.01.2011, 153, 600 009, 2.The, 625 002, 31.01.2011, 31.01.2011, 1., 01.11.2000, 23.10.2000, 23.10.2000, 31.01.2011, 3.2, 23.10.2000, 31.01.2011, 1, 101, 153, one, 3, 436, 3, 3, 10, 28.02.2014, 10, 1, 1, 06.04.2011, 3, 502, 1, 28, 6, 19, 9, 643, 9, 3, 5, 10, 573, 5, 598, 3, 193, 2, 672, 4, 755, 7, 353, 2011, 2, 439, 10, 677, 1, 1, 333.7, 1, 648, 3, 616, 5, 8, 2(2, 1, 1, 31.01.2011, 01.11.2000, 23.10.2000, 5, 1.11.2000 to 31.10.2005, 16, 18, one, 18, 1.11.2000, 1, 5, 1, 133, 135, 155, 139, 132, 135, 139, 132, 135, 155, 3, 5, 2, 7, 7, 14, 31.01.2011, 31.01.2011, 14, 23.10.2000, 01.11.2000, 3, 436, 28.02.2014, 06.04.2011, 3, 502, 10, 677, 2, 672, 4, 755, 3, 10, 573, 2, 42, 7, 353, 110, 1, 648, 294, 3, 616, 2011, 2, 439, 1.11.2000, 31.01.2011, 31.10.2015, 600 009, 2.The, 625 002

DATE: 6217, 2011, 2011, 2014, 2014, 01.12.2005, 2011, 2014, 2014, 01.12.2005, 01.12.2005, the expiry of, five years, 3162 of 2010, 03.12.2010, 42 of 2011, 15 years, annual, the first five years, 42 of 2011, 1851, 1989, 11, 1984, 2011, 56, 57, 68, 1998, 2005, 2010, 2014, 1999, 1875, 2011, 30, 2014, 2006, 2001, 1975, 2006, 2009, 2000, 2011, 2005, 2011, 2008, 2008, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2012, 42 of 2011, 1994, 2010, 2011, 1851, 1851, 15 years, five years, ten years, 2011, the year 2000, 15 years, annual, the first five years, five years, annual, five years, 2014, 2011, 2014, 2006, 2006, 12, 1976, 2003, 2007, 03.12.2010, the 1st, the 1st, a later date, 15 years, annual, first five years, five years, 6th year to 15th year, the initial five years, 2011, November 2005, 2011, 2014, 2011, 2014, 2010, 2008, 2008, November 2005, Januarly 2011, the 1st, the first five years, each year, the 6th year, 2000, 2011, annual, 2008, the 2nd, 1994, the 2nd, 2010, 15 years, 2000, 15 years, between 2000 to 2005, 2005, 2011, 2011, a period of, two weeks, the 1st, four weeks, the 1st, the 1st, six weeks, six weeks

GPE: Virudhunagar, Fort St. George, Madurai, Fort St. George, Madurai, Madurai, Counsel, Delhi, Babu, M.D., opus&quot, Babaria, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Manipur, AIR2012SUPREME, COURT864, Counsel, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar, India, India, M.D., Gujarat, Manipur, AIR2012SUPREME, Rajasthan, Counsel, G.O.Ms.15, Fort St. George

PERSON: Arignar Anna Maligai, M.Palani ^For, T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Pleader, G.R.Swaminathan, Arignar Anna Maligai, M.Palani, T.S.Mohammed Mohideen, Pleader, G.R.Swaminathan, M.Palani, Gazette, Gurnam Kaur, Jamna Das, P.J.Fitzgerald, quot;.A, Orissa, Mamata Mohanty, Paragraphs 37, Chandra Gogoi, Narvadeshwar Mishra, SCC422, Tewari v. State, Taylor, Taylor, Nazir Ahmad v. King, Ananta Saha, Kanhaiya Lal, Manik Lal Banerjee, Vijay Narayan Thatte, Devi Dayal, Ashok Lanka, Rishi Dixit, Shree Sidhbali Steels Limited, Goa, Manubhai Paragji Vashi, Tewari v. State, Dayaram, Sudhir Batham, G.R.Swaminathan, Government Order, Kumar Das, Tamil Nadu, Gazette, Tamil Nadu, Government Order, Corporation, Tamil Nadu, Paragraphs, Paragraphs, Paragraphs, Jabalpur Vs, Divisional Controller, Mahadeva Shetty, Orissa, Mamata Mohanty, Ananta Saha, Tewari v. State, TNUDF, TNUDF, Devi Dayal, TNUDF, interpretation&quot, authority.30, TNUDF, TNUDF, TNUDF, Arignar Anna Maligai

ORDINAL: first, second, second, first, second, second, first, second, second, first, second, second, first, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, first, 2nd, first, 2nd, 2nd

LOC: North Veli Street, Virudhunagar District, Madurai District, Virudhunagar District

NORP: Mandamus, Verghese, Hon'ble

PERCENT: 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%, 8%

WORK_OF_ART: State of Assam, Civil Appeal No.2958 of, Civil Appeal No.2958 of, 'Rule of Law'

MONEY: 2) SCC232

QUANTITY: 27.20 Kilometers

TIME: 1.11.2010

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //