Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gunwant Lal Godawat Vs. Collector of Customs
Decided On : Aug-14-1997
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: the Treasure Trove Act, the Treasure Trove Act, the Customs Act, Chapter 4A, the Customs Act, Section 123 of the Customs Act, F 1/48, Section 8(1, Section 11, the Customs Act
CARDINAL: 1, 85, 85, 65, 20, 3-8, 85, 2910.150, 85, 789, one, 26, 792, 37, 358, 50, 91, 37, 269, 91, 7, 85, 85, 85, 85, 85, 25-8-1948, 85, two, 85, at least 30 to, 85
ORG: Tribunal, Silver, the District Collector of Chittore, The District Collector, the Rajasthan State Revenue Board, the Revenue Board, Department, Department, AIR 1952, Innovation Secunderabad, Central Board of Customs and Excise, Tribunal, Collector Customs, Department, Tribunal, Collector of Customs, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Hindustan Bearing Corporation, Collector Customs, Tribunal, Department, Department, Department, District Collector, the State Board of Revenue, Bachcha Prasad v. Collector of Customs, Tribunal, C.C.E., Allahabad, Tribunal, Department, Department, Shri P.K. Jain, SDR, SDR, SDR, the Government of India Notification No, the District Collector, the Revenue Board, Rajasthan State Government, Rajasthan High Court, Department, Department, Department, Appellants, Silver
DATE: 8-8-1965, about 2 months, the present 85, 30 to 50 years old, 30 to 50 years old, 30 to 50 years old, the years 1934 to 1939, 1962, 1962, 1986, 1988, 1990, the period 1934 to 1939, 1988, 1997, 63, the year 1958, the year 1958-59, the years 1934-1939, 1962, 1947, 1962, 1962, 30 to 50 years
PERSON: Shri Harbans Singh, Anr, Harvinder Singh Katra, Chandra Laxidas Sharma, Tribunal, Rajasthan, Appellants
LOC: Id. Counsel, Chori Sadri
PRODUCT: Appellant
GPE: Bombay, India, Bombay, India, India, duty.10
ORDINAL: first, second