Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sundaram Fasteners Limited Vs. S.Venkatesan

Decided On : Jun-16-2014

Court : Chennai

LAW: Order XXXVI Rule 11, the Order XXXVIII, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 38, Rule 5, Order 38, Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order XIV Rule 8, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5 of Civil Procedure Code, Order 38 Rule 5(1, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 38 Rule 5(1, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 39 Rule 1, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 39 Rule 1, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 38 Rule 5, Order 39 Rule 1

PERSON: JUDICATURE, JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN, JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL, V.G.Jaganathan, Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, V.S.Venkatesan S/o., Natesan Nagar, Virugambakkam Chennai , P.R.Raman, D.Prabhu, 02.01.2013, 02.01.2013, 02.01.2013, the Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX Rule, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Appellant, Appellant, Order XIV Rule, Order XXXIX Rule 1, the Order XXXIX Rule 1, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Document No.9398, Sale Deeds,  I.R.namely, Sole Proprietor, Chennai , V. Uma Keshav, Rule, Plaint, Chennai, , Sale Deeds, Chennai ,  IR, Order XXXIX Rule 1, Plaint, J. Sgl

ORG: HONOURABLE, HONOURABLE, Executive Director &amp, Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff, Respondent/Respondent/Defendant Prayer: Appeals, Mukunth For M/s.N.Rangasamy COMMON JUDGMENT M.VENUGOPAL, Application, Attachment Before Judgment, the Respondent/Defendant, Application, the Respondent/Defendant, Nos.6 &amp, Application, Learned Single, Learned Counsel, Plaintiff (Appellant, the Respondent/Defendant, the Learned Counsel, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, Court, the Learned Counsel, the Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff, Court, the Learned Counsel, Appellant, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Original Application Schedule, the Learned Counsel, Plaintiff, Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, the Respondent/Defendant, Appellant, the Learned Counsel, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Respondent's Contention, the Learned Counsel, the Vacation Court of, the City Civil Court, Chennai, the Learned Counsel, the External Audit Report, the Appellant/ Plaintiff's, Certified Copy of Sale Deed, Dena Bank, the Original Suit, the Learned Counsel, the Appellant/ Plaintiff, Sale Deeds, Sale Deeds, Sale Deeds, Learned Counsel, the Enquiry Officer, Learned Counsel, Attachment Before Judgment, Court, Yehem Agency, pages 434 &amp, Suit, Court, Court, C.P.C.The Court, Court, dismissed. 20.He, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Process Engineering Company, another V. Solanki, 2 Supreme Court, CPC, the Appellant/ Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Special Audit Report, the Appellant/Plaintiff's, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, Company, Virugambakkam V.M.Ravi, Sale Deeds, Virugambakkam, Srinivasa, Kumbakonam SRO, Court, Court, a Court of Law, Plaintiff, Court, the Learned Counsel, the Respondent/Plaintiff, Appellant/Plaintiff Company, the Respondent/Defendant, Equitable Mortgage', the Appellant/Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Principles of Natural Justice, the Appellant/Plaintiff's Company, the Appellant/Plaintiff's, the Respondent/Defendant, the Respondent/Defendant, Court, Court, the Respondent/Defendant, Court, Attachment Before Judgment, Court, Plaintiff, an 'Attachment', a Competent Court of Law, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Civil Suit, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, the Respondent/Defendant, the Vacation Court, the City Civil Court, Chennai, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, the Respondent/Defendant, Equitable Mortgage, the Respondent/Defendant, Equitable Mortgage', the Appellant/Plaintiff, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, Court, the Respondent/Defendant, Equitable Mortgage', the Appellant/ Plaintiff, Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Respondent/Defendant, the Original Side Appeals, the Original Side Appeals, Court, J. AND M.VENUGOPAL

DATE: 2013, 2013, 2013, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2013, 2012, 2012, 2013, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 02.01.203, 2013, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2013, 2012, 2012, 1956, 2012, 2012, 21.05.2012, 27.10.2003, 2003, 30.06.2004, 27.10.2003, 2012, 2012, 2010, 2012, more than 12 years, 21.05.2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 17.11.2011, 21.05.2012, 2012, 27, 2012, 33.Be, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012

CARDINAL: 600 004, 600 092, 02.01.2013, 7, 7.This, 11, 2, 10.The, 5, 11.Once, 2, 5, 5.According, 8, 2, 10.The, 2, 11.Continuing, 12.The, 2, 14.Finally, 21.10.2011, 21.10.2011, one, 17.The, 18.The, 21.10.2011, 19.The, 5, 600 084, 1, 435, 302, 303, 21.At, 22.The, 21.10.2011, 21.10.2011, 23.It, 24.The, 25.At, 600 092, 2, 26.In, 27.At, 28.The, 29.Coming, 31.It, 32.The, 2, 2, 2, 34.In, 291

FAC: III Main Road, the Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff, Appellant, the Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Applicant, Summon, Thiruvidaimarudur Ooratchi Onriam, the Enquiry Officer, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff's

GPE: C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, Nos.9, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, Kumbakonam, Kumbakonam, V.M.Ravikumar, Virugambakkam, Raman Tech, C.S.No.507, C.S.No.507, Nallur Village, Thanjavur District, Application, V.M.Ravikumar

WORK_OF_ART: J. The Appellant/Applicant/Plaintiff, Sale Deed, Sale Deed, Appellant/Plaintiff, Appellant/Plaintiff's, Item Nos.1, Appellant/Plaintiff, Money Decree, Money Decree, 'Unsecured Debt', Miscellaneous Petition

LOC: Learned Single, Single, Affidavit

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Meenakshisundaram, Sale Deed, Sale Deed

ORDINAL: third, 7th, 7th

PERCENT: 18%, 18%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //