Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Simpson and General Finance Co.Ltd Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Decided On : Mar-21-2014
Court : Chennai
LAW: Section 260A, Section 211(3C, the Income Tax Act, the Lease Agreement
PERSON: JUDICATURE, CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, Justice, Anna Salai, R.Vijayaraghavan, N.V.Balaji, J., Schedule, Lessee, Lessee, Chennai 2, Bench Tax Case
CARDINAL: 21.03.2014, 130, 6, 600 002, 600 034, 105, 19, 19, 19, 19, 36, 19, 19, 19, 19, 207, 19(Delhi, 28.08.2008, 2, 10, 13, 15, seven, 19, 24, 33, 34, One, 19, 21.03.2014, 1, 130
ORG: Honourable, General Finance Co.Ltd., Income Tax Company Circle-I(2, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,, Chennai ".C", ITA Nos.36,37,38,39,40,41, Income Tax Department, Court, CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, Court, Tribunal, the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Tribunal, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the CBDT Circular, Company, Assessing, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, Income Tax (Appeals, the Assessing Authority, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Accounting Standard, Tribunal, Assessing, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, Tribunal, Investments/Current Assets Loans and Advances/Net Investment, Tribunal, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Instalment Supply Limited, Tribunal, Court, the Madras Advertising Co.Pvt.Ltd., Delivery of Equipment, Modification, Clauses, Hire Purchase, the Income Tax Authorities, LESSEE, the Finance Agreement, The Delhi High Court, the Apex Court, State, The Supreme Court, Appellate Authorities, the Tax Case (Appeals, Income Tax Company Circle-VI(2, Income Tax (Appeals-VI, The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,, Chennai ".C"
DATE: 2014, 2014, 861/862, 1961, 20.12.2012, 2008-09, years 2002, years, February 2001, year 2001-02, the financial year 2001-02, 2012, three years, monthly, year, year, monthly, 7) days, monthly, months
LOC: Accounting
ORDINAL: 9th, third
GPE: assessee, Kerala, J.and
PRODUCT: Schedule