Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

General Motors (i) Private Limited Vs. Ashok Ramnik Lal Tolat and anr.

Decided On : Oct-09-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 2(1, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 12, Section 2, Section 36-A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the MRTP Act, Section 2(1)(r, Section 36-A of the MRTP Act.19, Section 2(1)(r, Section 2(1)(d, Section 2(u, Section 36-A.4

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, OF2009GENERAL MOTORS, ANR, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the National Commission, Revision Petition Nos.3349, the District Forum, Ahmedabad (Rural, Rupees Fourteen Lakh, Rs.1,91,295/-, Jammu &amp, Chevrolet, AWD, VCD, Rs.1,91,295/-, Company, Jammu &amp, Rs.1,91,295/-, District Forum, Rs.1,91,295/-, Gujarat State, the State Commission, The State Commission, the District Forum, the State Commission, The National Commission, the State Commission, Chevrolet, AWD, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, District Forum, the State Commission, the National Commission, the District Forum, Rs.1,91,295/-, The National Commission, the National Commission, the “Consumer Welfare Fund, the Central Government, the National Commission, Rs.12,50,000/- (, Rupees Twelve Lacs, Rupess Twenty Five Lacs, the “Consumer Welfare Fund, the Central Government, the District Forum, the State Commission, the National Commission, Court, the National Commission, Court, Court, National Commission, Court, Court, meet.19, Ludhiana Improvement Trust, House Building Society, Colgate Palmolive, Court, Court, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices, Godfrey Phillips India Ltd., the District Forum, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the District Forum, The National Commission, the State Commission, the District Forum, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, the National Commission, the National Commission, GENERAL MOTORS, ANR, Respondent(s, Adv, Respondent(s, Bench, Gowda, VINOD

DATE: 8072-8073, 16th December, 2008, 2006, 2858, Rs.50,000/-, Rs.25,000/-, 1st May, 2004, Rs.50,000/-, 1986, about one year, four years, Rs.50,000/-, six weeks, 17th July, 2009, four weeks, today, 17th July, 2009, 1969, October 9, 2014, 8072-8073/2009, today, 2009, 2003, 2008

PERSON: GOEL, Leh Ladakh, Lakhs, AWD Chevrolet, Leh Ladakh, Rs.14 Lakhs, Rs.14 Lakhs, Rs.2,000/-, Lakhs, Rs.25, Shakti Coop, V. GOPALA GOWDA ]., SECTION XVII S, JUDGMENT, Appellant(s, Vikram Shokalia, Aparna Jha, Justice, Kumar Goel, Justice

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 2008.2, Fifty Thousand, 4, 120, four, 5, four, 8-6, 3, 11, approximately 14,000, twelve, fifty thousand, 12, about 260, Rs.5, Fifty Thousand, Rs.5, five, fifty thousand, three, 13, 20.11.2009, No.1, 17, one, 18, 1, 18-6-1993, 1, 6, five, five, 2, one, 1, 5, 1, 18, 09, 1, 12, 1 SCC129[3, 4

PERCENT: 18%, 18%, 9%

LOC: Kashmir, Kashmir

GPE: Nepal, Nepal, Ahmedabad

ORDINAL: first

PRODUCT: Rs.25, Rs.12,50,000/-, Ajay Kumar[3].

FAC: the District Forum, the District Forum

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //