Tata Metaliks Ltd. Vs. C.i.T Iii, Kolkata

Decided On : Sep-22-2014

Court : Kolkata

LAW: the Income Tax Act, Section 143(1, section 139(5, Section 143(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 139(5, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, Section 143(2, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 143, Section 143(1, Section 143(1)(i, section 139, section 156, section 143(1

DATE: 2005, September, 2014, 1961, the assessment year 1999-2000, August 08, 2000, March 31, 2001, 22nd February, 2005, 1999-2000, year, 1961, 8th August, 2000, 31st March, 2001, 8th August, 2000, the last day, 1st April, 1989 to 31st March, 1998, 1st April, 1998, 1997, 1st June, 1999, Between 1st April, 1998 and, 31st May, 1999, Oct., 1991, June, 1994, 1994, June, 1999, 1991, between 1st June, 1994, 31st May, 1999, between 1st Oct., 1991, 31st May, 1999, 1st April, 1989, 1997, 1996, June, 1999

PERSON: C.I.T III, J.P.Khaitan, Sanjoy Bhowmick, C.S.Das, A.G.Gutgutia, Khaitan, Tarsem Kumar, Ghutghutia, Anr versus Jagdamba Oil Mills, Khaitan, MRS.Ghutghutia, Rajesh Jhaveri, Rajesh Jhaveri, Rajesh Jhaveri

NORP: Hon'ble

ORG: Sections 139, Tribunal, Tribunal, Income Tax Officer & ORS, CTR, Supreme Court, Tribunal, Orissa & ORS.Versus Md.Illiyas, Supreme Court, Tribunal, CIT, Punjab National Bank, ITR763, Tribunal, Tribunal, Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers, AO, fiRs.proviso, s.143(1)(a).an, fiRs.proviso, AO, fiRs.proviso, AO, AO, AO, Explanation, Finance, Explanation, Finance, AO, CBDT, Apogee International LTD.versus Union of India, CTR, fiRs.proviso, AO, Supreme Court, Tribunal, CIT, Punjab National Bank, Assessing, Assessing

CARDINAL: 143, 291, 13, 256, 2002(3, three, 249, 13, two, two, one, 137, 220, 143.(1, 1, 2).an, 2, 2

EVENT: the Assessment Year

GPE: Assessee, Assessee

ORDINAL: second, second

MONEY: No.2) Act, No.2) Act

FAC: Departmental