State of Maharashtra Trhu Cbi Vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi and ors.

Decided On : Sep-19-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 482, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 120-B, Section 406, Section 482, Section 482, Section 239, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Section 307, Section 120-B/420 IPC, Section 120-B/420 IPC, Section 420, Section 120-B, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Section 120-B r/w Section 13(2, Section 120-B, Section 420 IPC, Section 471 IPC, Section 482 CrPC, Section 120/420 IPC, Section 471 of IPC, Article 226 of the Constitution or under Section 482 of the Code

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, S.L.P., Maharashtra Through CBI, Doshi, Bank of Baroda, the Special Court, CBI, Magistrate, Bank Officer, CBI, No.82/CPW/2006, IPC, the Bank of Baroda, the UTI Bank, the Federal Bank, Bank, Working Capital, Federal Bank, Bank, Bank, the Bank of Baroda, Term Loan, CC, WCDL, Term Loan, the UTI Bank, Federal Bank, Bank, A-3, the Demand Promissory Note, Working Capital of Rs.570.00, the Term Loan of Rs.360.00, the UTI Bank, Federal Bank, the Term Loan, Bank, Working Capital Funds, the Current Account, SBI, Dena Bank, Cash Credit, Working Capital, Working Capital, the Current Account, the Current Account, Rs.560.00, SBI, Rs.200.00, Dena Bank, Bank, CC, CC, WCDL, the Current Account, the Current Account, Banker’s Cheque, SBI, Dena Bank, Working Capital, UTI Bank, Federal Bank, SBI, Dena Bank, Bank, A-1, A-3, Bank, SBI, Dena Bank, SBI, Dena Bank, the Proprietors/Directors, Anew Electronics &, M/s Covet Securities, United Western Bank, the Bank of Baroda, the Bank of Baroda, the Bank of Baroda, Bank of Baroda, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, M/s Atcom Technology Limited, Bank of Baroda, Criminal Application No.2239, the High Court of Judicature, Bank, the High Court, A. Ravishanker Prasad, the Central Bureau of Investigation, the High Court, the High Court, IPC, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Central Bureau of Investigation v., Duncans Agro Industries, Bank, Bank, Court, the Oriental Bank of Commerce, the High Court, Bank, Central Bureau of Investigation v. A. Ravishanker Prasad, Court, Bank, the High Court, Court, Court, Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Court, the High Court, the High Court, Bench, the High Court, Court, the High Court, FIR, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, Singh &amp, Ors, State of Punjab &, Dimpy Gujral v. Union Territory, State, the High Courts, Court, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Public Servants, the High Court, CBI, ACB, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption of Act, CBI, IPC, Court, the High Court, the High Court, inter alia, Court, IPC, Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, the High Court, the High Court, CBI, Emphasis, Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, the High Court, Court, Sections 420/471 IPC, Court, Court, The High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court

DATE: 2011, 3.2.2006, 20, 467, 24.01.2003, 27.03.2003, 30th March 2009, 2009, 1988, 1988, September 19, 2008, 2009, 1996, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2014 3, 2014 4, 2013

PERSON: Versus Vikram, R.C. Sharma, Vikram Doshi, A1 Vineet Doshi, A3, Banks, K.K. Aggarwal, Chirag Gandhi, Rs.456.00 lakhs, Banks, Banks, Banks, Kanakranjan Jain, Kanakrajan Jain.7, Vikram Doshi, Vineet Joshi, Vikaram Doshi, Vikram Doshi, Vikram Doshi, Vikram Doshi, 24.2.2010, Addl, Metropolitan Magistrate, Mohan Abbot v. State, Pinky Anand, P.K. Dey, Arunabh Chowdhury, Anupam Lal Das, crimes.14, Rumi Dhar v. State, Bench, Nikhil Merchant v. C.B.I.[4, Bench, Nikhil Merchant’s case.16, Bench, Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, Bench, Bench, Gian Singh’s, Sambhu Kevat[9, Bench, Bench, Narendra Lal Jain &, Gopakumar B. Nair v. CBI, Gian Singh’s Case, Narendra Lal Jain, Narendra Lal Jain, Nikhil Merchant, Narendra Lal Jain, Gian Singh, Singh, Bench, Narendra Lal Jain, Bench, Gopakumar B. Nair’s, Narendra Lal Jain, Bench

NORP: J.The, Sanjay, Rs.114.00

CARDINAL: one, 6.1.2006, 468, 471, two, one, one, two, 29.01.2003, one, 10, one, two, two, two, 1, 48,50,000/-, 8, one, 420, 10, 406, 420, two, 14, two, 157, 92, three, three, 61, 17, two, two, 18, three, 11, 19, 61, 1, two, 20, 10, two, 23, 1, 4, 6, 5, 9, 6, 10, 10

GPE: Mumbai, ACMM, Mumbai, A2, Cr, P.C., Bombay, C.B.I., Rajasthan v., Mumbai, P.C., New Delhi

ORDINAL: 19th, first

LOC: Esplanade, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge

PERCENT: 15%

PRODUCT: A-1, Chargesheet, A-1, A-1, A-1, Sections 406

WORK_OF_ART: Current Account, No Due Certificate