State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Sanjay

Decided On : Sep-04-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 482, Section 379/114 IPC, Section 21, Section 22, Section 22, Section 21, Section 22, Section 379, Section 114, Section 21, the MMDR Act, the Indian Penal Code, the MMDR Act vis-à-vis Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 21, Section 21, Section 21, Section 379 IPC, Section 22, the Indian Penal Code, Section 21, Section 379 IPC, Section 22, the Indian Penal Code, Section 21, Section 379 IPC, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 21, Section 21(1, Section 21(2, the MMDR Act and Section 379 IPC, the MMDR Act, Section 379, the Indian Penal Code, Section 21(2, Section 379 I.P.C., Section 21(2, Section 379 I.P.C., Section 22, Section 21(6, Section 21, Section 21(6, Section 22, Section 22, Section 190, Chapter 12 Cr, Section 21, Chapter 12, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 22, Section 21, Section 21(6, Chapter 12, Section 156, Section 20, Section 156, Section 21, Chapter 12, Chapter 12, Chapter 12, Section 156 of the Code, Section 170, Chapter 12, Section 4, the MMDR Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4, Section 617, the Companies Act, Section 18, Section 4, Section 21, section 4, section 4, Section 21, Section 4(1A, Section 21, section 4, Section 4 of the Act, Section 21, an Amendment Act, Section 22, Section 100 of Code of Criminal Procedure, section 100, Section 23(C)(1, the MMDR Act, Section 4, the Indian Penal Code, Section 4, Section 41 of the Code, Section 41, Chapter 11, Mines and Minerals Act, Article 39(b, Constitution, Section 13(1)(e, Section 17 of the Act, Act 49 of 1988, Section 190, Section 190, Section 190, Section 190(1, Section 190(1, Section 537 Cr, Section 5(4, Section 35, Section 167(2, Section 167, Section 104(2, the Customs Act, the Constitution Bench, the Sea Customs Act, Article 20(2, Constitution, The Constitution Bench, the Sea Customs Act, Constitution, Section 409, Section 105 of the Insurance Act, Section 26, Article 20(2, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article, the Insurance Act, Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Insurance Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Insurance Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Constitution, the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Constitution, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Article cannot, Section 177, Section 52, the Income Tax Act, Section 26, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, the Gold Control Act, the Customs Act, the Constitution Bench, Section 157(8)(c, the Customs Act, the Sea Customs Act, Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, the Sea Customs Act, the Sea Customs Act, Section 55, Section 21, Section 55 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, Section 210, Section 210, Section 429 IPC, Section 9(1, Section 50(1, Section 56 of the Act, Article 20(2, Article 20 of the Constitution, the Ordinance/Act, Section 6(1, Section 6(2, Section 26, Section 5 and Section 6(3, Section 6(3, Section 6(3, Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, Section 6(3, Section 6(3, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5, Section 39, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 50 of the Act, Section 39 of the Act, the Indian Penal Code, Section 39, the Indian Penal Code, Section 39, the Chartered Accountants Act, Section 397, the C.A. Act, the C.A. Act, Section 195(1, the C.A. Act, Section 195(1)(b)(ii, Section 195 CrPC, Section 195(3, Section 195, Article 48-A of the Constitution requires, Article 51-A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 4, Section 21, Section 4, Section 4, Section 22, Section 21, Section 22, the MMDR Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 22, Section 4 of the Act, Section 378, Section 4 of the Act, Section 21, the MMDR Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173, Section 190, the Indian Penal Code, the MMDR Act, Section 378 Cr, the MMRD Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.499 OF2011STATE OF NCT, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2105 OF2013JAYSUKH, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, SONDABHAI HANUBHAI BHARWAD, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, Sections 21, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, Section 379/114, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation, Criminal Appeal No.499, the Delhi High Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, MMDR, the Gujarat High Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, Murlidhar Stone Industries, Village Thoriwari, State, Section 379/114, IPC, FIR, the High Court of, Bhuj Taluka Police Station, IPC, Sayla Police Station, Sections 4(1, Criminal Appeal No.499, the Delhi High Court, FIR, Magistrate, The High Court, FIR, The High Court, FIR, Magistrate, the Gujarat High Court, FIR, Magistrate, The Gujarat High Court, FIR, Magistrate, Police, The High Court, FIR, Magistrate, the Central Government, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, Inspector of Police, FIR, Government, Court, IPC, IPC, The Calcutta High Court, Smt, State, the Block Land Reforms Officer, the Police Station, Bhatar, FIR, Magistrate, the Calcutta High Court, Magistrate, the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, Magistrate, the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, Gujarat High Court, Delhi High Court, Kerala High Court, Calcutta High Court, Madras High Court, Jharkhand High Court, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, Magistrate, Magistrate, Kerala High Court, Madras High Court, Court, Legislature, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, the Geological Survey of, the Indian Bureau of Mines, the Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research of the Department of Atomic Energy of the Central Government, State Government, the Mineral Exploration Corporation Limited, the Union Territory of Goa, Diu, State Government, the Central Government, State, the State Government, Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, State, Central, State Government, the Central Government, a State Government, the Government of Gujarat, Gujarat Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, the First Schedule, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Sand, M. Palanisamy, The State of Tamil Nadu, the Mine and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, the Madras High Court, Centre for Public Interest Litigation, Union of India, Court, State, State, State, Parliament, State Legislatures, Court, Sovereign, Crown, Crown, Law, University of Michigan, the Modern Public Trust Doctrine, Michigan Law Review, the Public Trust Doctrine, State, The Public Trust Doctrine, Government, State, State, State of A.P., SCC549 this Court, State, Corfu Channel, the United Nations Conference, Stockholm Convention, Government, State, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Court, State, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, H.N. Rishbud v. State of, Sections 190, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Sections 193, Directorate of Enforcement, Court, Magistrate, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Court, Magistrate, High Courts, Magistrate, Magistrate, State, Court, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Government of India, section 167(8) of, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, section 167(8) of, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Court of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, the Court of the Chief Presidency Magistrate, Court, the principle of ".autrefois convict&quot, England ".that, ".pro eadem causa&quot, State, IPC, property&quot, the ".same, the High Court, Court, S.C.R. 423 the, the High Court, Court, s. 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, State of Madhya Pradesh, S.C.R., the Prevention of Corruption Act, the State Government, Magistrate, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, The High Court, State, Court, State, Court, ".This Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act II, The High Court, T.S. Baliah, ITO, Court, IPC, Court, Act ".except, Collector of Customs, Court, Court, Leo Roy Frey, Court, Court, Customs, Customs, the United States Supreme Court, the Collector of Customs, the ".same, the Collector of Customs, the Collector of Customs, Maqbool Hussain, the Wild Life (Protection, the State Government, State of Bihar, the Judicial Magistrate, IPC, Sections 54, the Wild Life (Protection, the High Court, Magistrate, The High Court, Magistrate, The High Court, Magistrate, Court, State of Bihar, Shri R.F. Nariman, the High Court, pic].consequence, Leo Roy Frey v. Superintendent, State, the Collector under Sections 5 and 6, the Rajasthan Sati (Prevention) Ordinance, Sections 5 and 6, Sections 5, Court, the High Court, Court, State of Punjab, Sections 48 and 49 indicate, s. 50 is, s. 50 is, Court, Institute of Chartered Accountants, Vimal Kumar Surana, SCC534 this Court, ’s Institute of Chartered Accounts, the Income Tax Department, the Madhya Pradesh Trade Tax Act, the Chartered Accountants, IPC, Magistrate, IPC, Sections 24, IPC, Magistrate, Council, Magistrate, Magistrate, The High Court, Magistrate, IPC, Court, Court, Sections 24-A, Sections 416, CrPC, CrPC, the Income Tax Department, the Madhya Pradesh Trade Tax Act, CrPC, State, the Doctrine of Public Trust, Campbell, the Supreme Court, Legislature, the Interpretation of Statutes 10th Edn, State, U.P., Court, inter alia, Court, State, State, Magistrate, State, Sections 378, IPC, State, State, Magistrate, Government, Magistrate, State, IPC, Magistrate, Magistrates

PERSON: Versus SANJAY, Versus STATE, Versus STATE, Versus STATE, Versus STATE, suo motu, Seema Sarkar, Nikhil Goel, Daman, Eqbal, M.C. Mehta, Kamal Nath, Joseph L. Sax, Vol, Sax the Public Trust Doctrine, Manohar Lal Sharma, Principal, Ram Singh, Bench, AIR1955SC196, Lumbhardar Zutshi v. R., Deepak Mahajan, Charles J.in Reg, delicto&quot, S.L. Apte, contract&quot, Veereshwar Rao, Govinda Menon, J., Vasantraj Bhagwanji Bhatia, Thomas Dana, U.S.78, Murad Ali Khan, Lordships held:“24, Blockburger, Hat Singh, Avtar Singh, Chartered Accountant, Sections 2, Shri Gupta, IPC, Turner Lord, Pratap Singh, Shri Krishna Gupta, Maxell, Babu Ram Upadhya, Magistrate, M.Y. Eqbal, Chandra Ghose

DATE: 2108-2112, 2013, 2013, 2013, 22, 1957, 2011, 1957, 2108-2112, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2011, 2012, 1957, 1957?.12, 1957, 1957, 1973, 1957, 1957, 2105, 2106, 2107, 2013, 1957, 11, 1980, 2008, 2009, 1957, 1956, 21, two years, one year, every day, 1973, two years, 1986, 1973, 2005, 1973, less than seven years, less than seven years, may extend to seven years, a year, 2012, 1959, 1957, thousands of years, Today, 36, 2012, 1997, 2006, 1972, 2014, 2000, 1988, 1947, the year 1988, 1898, 1947, 1994, 1973, 42, 1947, the 25th August, 1948, 44, 1952, three years', 1947, 1947, 1922, 46, 1988, 1962, 1968, 1968, 47, 1972, 49, 1988, 1972, 1969, 2003, 1987, 1910, 47, 2011, 1949, 4, 5, 25, 463, 42, 1995, 55, offence.57, 1861, the years, September 04, 2014

GPE: M.Y.EQBAL, P.C., Gujarat, Kannan, Faridabad, Cr, P.C., India, Cr, P.C., India, India, Roman Empire, India, Delhi, Parbhu, Maqbool Hussain, Bombay, Bombay, Jeddah, Bombay, Bombay, U.P., United States, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., United States, Double Jeopardy, District Jail, Ordinance, Sections40, India, Cr, Cr, P.C., Liverpool Borough, India, theft.71, Cr, P.C., P.C., New Delhi

NORP: J.1, Yamuna, Yamuna, Rules, Sengol, Roman, Indian, Indian, American, Indian

CARDINAL: one, 4, 21(1, three, 1, 2, 3, 18, 18, 6, 9, 1, 2, 22, 35, two, 4(1A, 13, 1995)1, 6, 14, 6, at least three, 3, 3, 6, 14, 173, one, three, 4, 6, 7, 1, two, 4, 1, 1A, 2, 3, 19, 21, 22, 1, 1, 1A, five thousand, 2, five thousand, five hundred, 3, 1, 4, 4, 1, 5, 6, 1, 20, 6, 1, 22, 21, 23B., 23, 2(d, 2(h, 2(d, 2(h, 25, 2, 41, 1, 26, 149, 150, 151, 152, 149, 1, 2, 1, 27, 7, 4, one, 3, 75, 24, 68, 1, 473, two, 25, 34, 38, 3, 67, 2, 39, 2, 24, 40, 5, 13(2, 9, 14, three, 193, 195, 199, 537, one, 195, 199, one, 3, 23, 134, 3, 43, one, two, two, two, two, 409, 1, 2, 405, two, 1)(c, 2, two, two, two, two, 3, two, 238, two, 48, 4, 447, 429, 379, 39, 26, two, one, 27, 108:“The, one, two, two, 28, two, two, 50, two, 2, 6, 1, 2, 47, 1, 419, 468, 471, 472, 419, 468, 471, 473, 26, 26, two, 464, 468, 471, two, 1A, 1A, 6, 1973.58, 60, 30, 380, 62, 141, one, 63, one, 381, 65, one, 66, 379, 1)(d

PRODUCT: thereunder.2, Rules, authority&quot, Chartered Accountant

ORDINAL: firstly, Firstly, first, first, First, Second, first, second, third, First, second, second, second, First, first

WORK_OF_ART: 2(c, Doctrine of the Public Trust, Art. 20 of the Constitution

TIME: twenty-four hours

QUANTITY: more than 12 million tonnes, 15 centimetres, less than 9 carats, less than 9 carats

LOC: Vembanad Lake, under:“24, Central

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals Concession Rules, Constitutional

LANGUAGE: English, Roman, English, English

EVENT: World War