National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S. Sricon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd

Decided On : Aug-08-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, section 34, Section 34, Section 34, the Contract Agreement, the Contract Agreement, the Contract Agreement, section 34, Section 34, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, the Contract Agreement, the Contract Agreement, Section 33, Section 34 of the Act

ORG: NE W DELHI Order Reserved, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Respondent/Claimant, Rs.1366.23, the Arbitral Tribunal, Cum, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitration Award, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, Engineer, the Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, CA, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, Engineer, the Supreme Court, M CDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL INC, the Supreme Court, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, the General Conditions of Contract, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, the Dispute Review Expert, Dispute Review Expert, Engineer, Engineer, Claimant, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Engineer, Claimant, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Engineer, Claimant, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, Claimant's Thereafter, Claimant, DBM, BC, Engineer, DBM, The Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, O & M, Claimant, DBM, Engineer, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, The Arbitral Tribunal, General Conditions of Contract, The Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, the Respondent the Arbitral Tribunal, LHS, Engineer, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Engineer, General Conditions of Contract, Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Engineer, Engineer, Contract Agreement, Engineer, Claimant, The Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, the General Conditions of Contract, the Arbitral Tribunal, the General Conditions of Contract, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, The Arbitral Tribunal, DBM, BC, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Respondent/Claimant, the Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, compensation.48, The Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, Engineer, Claimant, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Engineer, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitrators, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, ONGC L TD, SAW P IPES L TD, SCC705to, the Arbitral Tribunal, M/S. BHH SECURITIES (P.) LTD., TLANTA, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the General Conditions of Contract, HAMPAT SINGH & O RS, U NION OF INDIA VS, U.P. U PBHOKTA SEHKARI, Court, OKAK L IMITED VS, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Respondent/Claimant, Arbitral, Tribunal, General Conditions of Contract, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal

CARDINAL: 04.2014, 08.2014, 03.06.2009, 11.06.2004, 2, 10, 03.06.2009, 6.23, 23, 1366.23, 9, 23, 11, 25, two, two, 1.3, 28.3, 24.1, 24.1, 28.01.2007.32, 02.02.2007, 23.05.2005, 36, 29.05.2005, 28.07.2005, 2005.39, 30.09.2005, 44.1, 4, 13, 7, 13, 8.54, 65, 4, 8.54, 100, 30.09.2005, 32.2, 3, 1, 1 2, 1, 4, 3, 67, 102, One, 122.48, 1519.29, 4, 2, 4, 1522.48, 1519.29, 2, 2, 122.48, 1522.48, 1522.48, 1519.29, 1366.23, 1369.57, approximately 3, 23, 3

PERSON: Saurabh S. Sinha, Arijit Mazumdar, versus M/ S, Ravi Gupta, Rajul Srivastav, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Lakhs, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Sectio, Award, Award, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Award, Award, Contract, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, SANJEEV SACHDEVA

WORK_OF_ART: J1 The Petitioner, Contract Agreement, Contract Agreement, Contract Agreement, Contract Agreement, Contract Agreement, the Award of the Arbitral Tribunal

DATE: 1996, 03.06.2009, 03.06.2009, three months, 11.06.2009, the year 2005, 18.03.2005, 17.05.2005, 02.02.2007, 11.06.2009, 03.06.2009, nine months, about 16 months, about two months, 226 days, 226 days, a span of eight days, 2006, 34, it.29, 25.09.2006, 13.09.2006.31, 21 days, 03.06.2005, July/August, 6, 65, 44.1(a, five decades, about two decades, 2 58, 2003 5, 2012, 2013, 1969, 2003, 2003, thirty days, a span of eight days, August 08, 2014

PERCENT: 12%, 216%, only 0.2%

PRODUCT: Award, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Contract Agreement, VS, F ORBES G, Award

GPE: Gurgaon, facts.12, Rs.1366, compensation.33

ORDINAL: first

LOC: Respondent, the Contract Agreement.44

EVENT: the Contract Agreement, the Contract Agreement, the Contract Agreement

QUANTITY: 6.4 km, 29.855 km, 9.2 km, 25.537 km, 140 mm