Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Present:- Mr. Viney Saini Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Decided On : Jul-25-2014

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 34, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Section 320(9, Section 482 Cr, section 498-A, Section 34

PERSON: Misc, Misc, Petitioners Versus State, Haryana, Viney Saini, Haryana, Ankit Aggarwal, J. PetitioneRs.namely Gulshan Kumar, Kundal Lal, Tarun Kumar, Petitioner no.1, jeth, jethani, Crl, Misc, Crl, Misc, Crl, Misc, Bench, Kulwinder Singh, Crl, Misc, Preeti Gupta, Crl, Misc, Crl, Misc, Gulshan Kumar, Kundan Lal, Tarun Kumar

WORK_OF_ART: Date of Decision

CARDINAL: 25.07.2014, No.2, No.3, No.4, No.2, No.2, 25.11.2000, two, No.2, No.2, No.2, 4, 2010(7, 30, one, 32, 34, 35, 25.07.2014

ORG: D.A.G., FIR, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court's, the High Court, the High Court, State, Court, Court, the High Court, Society, the Apex Court, State of Jharkhand, IPC, Bar, Bar, Bar, Kaur Gurpreet, Registry, the Law Commission, Government of India, Law & Justice

GPE: Tamanna, Ambala City, Karnataka vs L. Muniswami, SCC667as, Ambala City, Tamanna

DATE: 2014 2 No.2, 11.03.2014, 2014 5, 31, a few days

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1

FAC: the Kaur Gurpreet, Kaur Gurpreet, Kaur Gurpreet

NORP: Hon'ble

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //