Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Present:- Mr. Viney Saini Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Another
Decided On : Jul-25-2014
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: Section 34, Section 482 Cr, Section 482, Section 320(9, Section 482 Cr, section 498-A, Section 34
PERSON: Misc, Misc, Petitioners Versus State, Haryana, Viney Saini, Haryana, Ankit Aggarwal, J. PetitioneRs.namely Gulshan Kumar, Kundal Lal, Tarun Kumar, Petitioner no.1, jeth, jethani, Crl, Misc, Crl, Misc, Crl, Misc, Bench, Kulwinder Singh, Crl, Misc, Preeti Gupta, Crl, Misc, Crl, Misc, Gulshan Kumar, Kundan Lal, Tarun Kumar
WORK_OF_ART: Date of Decision
CARDINAL: 25.07.2014, No.2, No.3, No.4, No.2, No.2, 25.11.2000, two, No.2, No.2, No.2, 4, 2010(7, 30, one, 32, 34, 35, 25.07.2014
ORG: D.A.G., FIR, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court's, the High Court, the High Court, State, Court, Court, the High Court, Society, the Apex Court, State of Jharkhand, IPC, Bar, Bar, Bar, Kaur Gurpreet, Registry, the Law Commission, Government of India, Law & Justice
GPE: Tamanna, Ambala City, Karnataka vs L. Muniswami, SCC667as, Ambala City, Tamanna
DATE: 2014 2 No.2, 11.03.2014, 2014 5, 31, a few days
PRODUCT: No.1, No.1
FAC: the Kaur Gurpreet, Kaur Gurpreet, Kaur Gurpreet
NORP: Hon'ble