Satti Paradesi Samadhi and Pilliar Temple Vs. M. Sakuntala(D) Tr.Lrs.and ors.

Decided On : Jul-03-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Limitation Act, Article 26 of the Limitation Act, Section 27, the Limitation Act, Article 92, Article 92, Section 10, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 59, Article, Article 59, Section 10 of the Limitation Act, Article 59, Article 59, Order 14, Order 14, Order 14 Rule 2, Order 14, Order 14 Rule 2 CPC, Order 14 Rule 2, Code of Civil Procedure, Order 14 Rule 2 CPC, Section 10, the Limitation Act, Order 14, Rule 2, Order 14, Section 10 of the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5954, S.L.P., Satti Paradesi Samadhi &, Philliar Temple, Respondents JUDGMENT Dipak Misra Leave, the Division Bench, the High Court of Judicature, the Sub Registrar’s Office, Pillayar Temple Trust, Trust, the Division Bench, |him, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Division Bench, the High Court

DATE: 2014, 2014, 2006, 1997, 1978, the year 1978, 19 years earlier, 1963, twelve years, twelve years from 1978, No.4, 1978, 1978, twelve years, the year 1977, twelve years, nineteen years, 1976, 1976, twelve years, 1997, July 03, 2011, 1964, 2006

PERSON: Versus M. Sankuntala, Lrs, Document Nos, Royapuram, Sri B.S. Ramalingam, Satti Paradesi Samadhi, Articles 92 and, Saradambal, R. Basant, Himanshu Munshi, Basant, Articles, Ramrameshwari Devi, Nirmala Devi, S.S. Khanna, Brig, Ramesh D. Desai, Vadilal Mehta, S.S. Khanna, Articles

FAC: Madras

CARDINAL: 24.07.2003, three, 27.3.1978, two, 1, three, 27.3.1978, 248, 249, 443, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 56 to 59, 22, 24.12.1978, 10, 92 and 96, 92 and 96, 2, 2, 13, 2, 2, 92 to 96, three, two, 1, 8, 4, 5

GPE: S.C., bequeathed|, Sectin10, New Delhi

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, Articles, Article, No.1

WORK_OF_ART: the Schedule Properties

NORP: Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, |Hindu, Muslim, |Buddhist

ORDINAL: first, first, first