Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Present: Mr. Ashwinie Kumar Bansal Advocate Vs. Union of India and Another ...Petitioners
Decided On : Jul-10-2014
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: the Arbitration Act, Article 119 of the Indian Limitation Act, Section 151 CPC, Condition 11-C of the General Conditions of Contracts, Condition 11-C, Condition 36, the Condition 36, Section 34(2, Section 14(2, Section 14(2, East Punjab, Article 119 recognizes, Article 119 of the Limitation Act, Article 119, Section 14(2, Section 14(2, Article 158 of the Limitation Act, Article 119 of the Indian Limitation Act
ORG: vinod, Chandigarh CR No.5042, decision:10.07.2014 Union of India, J. (Oral, Court, the Competent Authority, Arbitrator, the Civil Court, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Union of India, Sections 14, Court, Civil Court, the Trial Court, the Civil Court, no.2, the Trial Court, Court, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Court, Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Appellate Court, the Civil Court, CM Nos.23648-49-CII-2013, Chandigarh CR No.5042, CM No.23649-CII- 2013, the Annexures P-1, the Annexures P-1, the Trial Court, Rupees Damages, GE, Conditions (A, vinod, Chandigarh CR No.5042, The Supreme Court, Ramnath International Construction, Union of India, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Hangar Contract, Road Contract, Court, Manohar Lal & Sons v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Court, Chandigarh CR No.5042, the General Conditions of Contracts, Accepted Risks, Engineer, G.E., Chandigarh CR No.5042, Works, no.9, the General Conditions of Contracts, the Civil Court, the Trial Court, Chandigarh CR No.5042, the Supreme Court, Delhi Development Authority v. M/s R.S.Sharma & Co., the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Court, vinod, Chandigarh CR No.5042, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, no.2, Court, Court, vinod, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Court, Court, Court, Hari Chand v., AIR, Court, Court, Court, vinod, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.v, M/s Nippon Steel Corporation Ltd., Additional, Chandigarh CR No.5042, M/s Little & Co.at, Court, Court, Court, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Anant Raj Agencies, Delhi Development Authority, the Delhi High Court, Court, the Supreme Court:-, vinod, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Court, Court, Chandigarh CR No.5042, Court
DATE: 2003, 2003, 10.05.1991, the year 1982-83, 23.08.1985, the year 1989, 2003, 10.05.1991, 1940, 10.05.1991, 4, 6, 9, 13, 16, 2003, 11.11.1993, 11.11.1993, 30 days, 1963, 18.03.1996, 2003, 9, 16, 2003, 2007, 2003, 2000, 03.08.2010, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1996, 2003, 9, 16, 2003, 35) 1948, 11, 1919, ten days, 2003, ten days to, thirty days, that day, 2003, 2003, Section 14(2, 2003, 1908, 30 days, 2003, 30 days, 1963, July 10, 2014
CARDINAL: 1, 18.03.1996, 26.07.2003, 17, 2, 28, only 17, 17, 4, 17, two, 1, 2., 17, 2, 3, 20.08.1993, 2, 11.12.1993, 13.01.1994, two, two, 17, 28, two, 4, 80,000, 81320, 9 20000, 16, 2,00,000 15068.82, 5, 2, 453, 6, 24, 13 to, 16, 7, 16, 36, 8, 16, 9, 2008(4, 165, 12, 10, 36, 14, 1, 2, 11, 158, 12, 158, 29.11.1943, 2007(1, 73, 24, 13, 37, one, 14, 1997(69, 6, one, 15, 16
PERSON: Justice, Ashwinie, Kumar Bansal, JAIN, Contractor, Contractor, Contractor, Pleader, Jalandhar, AGE(I).81,320 GE(P, Addl, Award, vinod kumar, Works, Works, Works, Award, Award, Award, Lachhman Das, Gopal Subramanium, Articles, Award, Award, Singh v. Champat Singh, JAIN
PRODUCT: no.1, nos.3, no.1, no.1, P-3, no.9, no.1
GPE: no.3, Clause, Clause, CR, New Delhi, India, India, Dewan, Clause
ORDINAL: second, second
NORP: P-1, Punjab, Indian
LOC: P-5, P-5
WORK_OF_ART: The Contractor