Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

United Telecoms Ltd. Vs. Idbi Bank Ltd and anr

Decided On : Jul-01-2014

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 9, Bill of Material, Section 165, the Indian Evidence Act

DATE: April, 2014, July, 2014, 01.08.2012, 30.01.2013, 40, 40 days, 31.03.2012.10, 15.12.2011, 10.04.2012, 29.02.2012, 10.04.2012, 10.4.2012, 27.07.2012, 30.01.2013, 1996, 1988, 1997, 1998, 1984, 1978, 1977, 1985, 1996, 2007, 15.12.2011, 10.04.2012, 29.02.2012, 10.04.2012, 27.07.2012, 01.08.2012, J July 01, 2014

CARDINAL: 144/2014, 40, 40, 40, 80, 40, 80, 80, 23.08.2013, 29.02.2012, 80, 29.02.2012, 40, three, two, 80, 25.07.2012, 80, 40, 80, 40, 80, 80, 23.08.2013, 1, 1, only two, two, 2, 1, 1, 13, 18, 2, 2, 617, 8, 29.02.2012, 80, 29.02.2012, 40, three, two, 80, 80, 10.04.2012, 25.07.2012, 80

ORG: UNITED T ELECOMS L TD, Dense Wave Division, the Letter of Acceptance, BOM, LOA, Letter of Intent, Security Deposit, LOA, Contract/LOA, Court, MO M, Design/BOM, Court, Respondents, Petitioners, Respondents, Court, Respondents, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, the Supreme Court of India, U.P. C OOP, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantees, The Supreme Court, U.P. STATE SUGAR C ORPN, V. SUMAC INTERNATIONAL L TD, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, The Supreme Court, U.P. STATE SUGAR C ORPN, Bank Guarantees, the Supreme Court, Bank Guarantees, The Supreme Court, I.T.C. L TD, EBTS, Bank, Bank, Bolivinter Oil S.A., Chase Manhattan Bank N.A., Bank, S.A. & Murray Clayton Ltd., Allied Arab Bank Ltd., Bank, Waller, J.in Turkiye v. Bank of China, LLR, The Supreme Court, OAL, the S upreme Court, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantees, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Petitioners

PERSON: D. K. Malhotra, Rajesh Kumar Malhotra, Chetan Sharma, Yaman Kumar, Sudipa Dasgupta, Multiplex, Petitioner, OMP4342013, DWDM, Romi Sharma, Petitioner, Lane, Edward Owen, Ackner, DWDM, Romi Sharma, facie, Petitioner, SANJEEV SACHDEVA

NORP: J.1

PRODUCT: Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent No.2, Respondent, Respondent No.2

PERCENT: 10%

TIME: Minutes

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, second

LOC: L TD, the Respondent No.2

WORK_OF_ART: 3 WLR764 CA

GPE: Petitioner.33

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //