Manohar Lal Vs. State of Haryana

Decided On : Jul-01-2014

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 498-A, Section 304B/34 IPC, Section 304B IPC, Section 174 Cr, Section 313 Cr, section 2, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 304-B IPC, Section 304-B, Section 498-A, Section 304-B IPC, Section 113B of the Evidence Act, Section 2, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 304-B IPC, the Evidence Act, Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 113-B, the Evidence Act, Section 304-B IPC, Section 113-B of the Evidence Act, Section 113-B, Section 304- B IPC, Section 498-A., Section 304B IPC

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, LAL, the High Court of Punjab, the High Court, Section 304B IPC, Civil Hospital, FIR, P.7, P-8, P.N., the Civil Hospital, P.D., FIR, IPC, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, FIR, Section 304B IPC, Yamuna Nagar, Ext, Jindu, hostile.12, PW.6-Ram Mehar Singh, Constable, Antawa, FSL, Yamuna Nagar, Prakash Transport, Santosh, Prakash Transport, Kaithal, IPC, Court, State of, State of M.P., SCC417 this Court held:“5, Court, the High Court, IPC, Court, Hira Lal &amp, State, IPC, IPC, Dowry Prohibition (Amendment, Court, the Law Commission of India, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, Respondent(s, Bench

PERSON: JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, Haryana, Phullan @ Darshana, Manohar Lal, Raj Rani, Exh, Krishan Lal, Harbans Lal, Gopal Dass, Shanti, Smt, ASI Surat Kant, Hans Raj(PW.8, Sat Pal, Ex, Swaran Kumar, Krishan Lal, Raj, P.D./2, ASI- Ram Krishna, Krishan Lal, P.O. Complainant-Raj Rani, Kanayadan Mark A. After, Ram Prakash, Krishan Lal, Harbans Lal, Gopal Dass, Shanti, Smt, Bodha Ram, Manohar Lal, Darshana @ Phoolan, Raj Rani, Darshana @Phullan, Darshana @ Phullan, Jindu Ram, Jindu Ram, Darshana @ Phullan, Devi Lal.7, Usha Rani, Darshana @Phullan, A.K. Gupta, Usha Rani, Manohar Lal, Darshana @ Phullan, Manohar Lal, Manohar Lal, Bahu, accordingly.13, Manohar Lal, Darshana @ Phullan, Darshana @ Phullan, Kishan, Ram Prakash, Manohar Lal, Manohar Lal, Kaliaperumal, Tamil Nadu, Sunil Bajaj, Balwant Singh, Manohar Lal, Manohar Lal, Bail Bonds, J.(SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, Appellant(s, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Santosh Singh, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya

DATE: 26th March, 2007, 1994, about 5 years, 27th August, 1991, 28th August, 1991, the next day, 30th August, 1991, 25th August, 1994, seven years, eight years, about five years back, about eight days, One day, 28th August, 1991, occurrence.11, the last 4 or 5 years, about 2 years, months, the day, 26th August, 1991, seven years, 1961, 28 of 1961, less than seven years, seven years, 2001, 7 years, less than 7 years, three years, 2003, seven years, 1961, 28 of 1961, less than seven years, seven years, seven years, 1986, 45 of 1860, 2004, seven years, 26th August, 1994, 26th March, 2007, JULY01 2014, 1188/2009, today

CARDINAL: seven, one, half, one, nine, about 8-9 months, 12.30P.M., three, About 2, 5.00P.M., 1, 2) Whoever, 17, 18, 9, 2, 3, 4, two, 1 19, 8, 2, 113, two, 10-8-1988, 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, two, 304, 01

EVENT: P.M., Rakhi

TIME: twenty hours

GPE: Puran Chand, P.C., hostile.10., PW.8, P.C., Delhi, NEW DELHI, SHARMA

MONEY: 189

ORDINAL: first

WORK_OF_ART: Dowry Deaths and Law Reform, State of Punjab, 7 SCC724