Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jones (Appellant) Vs. Kaney (Respondent)

Decided On : Mar-30-2011

Court : UK Supreme Court

LAW: section 12, section 13, the Supply of Goods and Services Act, section 13, the Supply of Goods and Services Act, Protocol, Protocol

PERSON: ¦, Ter Haar QC, Bennett, Bennett, Bennett, Dr El-Assra, Mr El-Assra, Cutler v Dixon, Dawkins, Rokeby, Goddard CJ, Mansfield, Lofft, Rondel v Worsley, Medcalf v Mardell, Cutler, Clyde, Clyde, Wilberforce, Hope, the Earl of, Simon Tuckey QC, Saif Ali v, Sydney Mitchell, Thomas Bingham, Simon Tuckey, Simon Tuckey's, Chadwick LJ, Chadwick LJ's, Rondel v Worsley, Hedley Byrne, Rondel v Worsley, ¦, Lord Reid, Morris, Pearce, Lord Reid, Morris, Reid, Morris, Pearce, Saif Ali, Sydney Mitchell, Keith, Kinkel, Wilberforce, McCarthy, Salmon, Russell, Killowen, Hoffmann, Scott, Lawrence QC, Lawrence, Lawrence, Woolf, Lawrence, Lawrence, Lawrence, Lawrence, Ter Haar, Ter Haar, Peter Smith, Lawrence, Hoffmann, Cala Homes, Laddie J, Woolf, Clyde, Lord Reid, Lawrence, Ter Haar, Lawrence, Lawrence, Lawrence, Ter Haar, Lawrence, Hunter, LORD BROWN, Hoffmann, Taylor, LORD COLLINS, Dawkins, Rokeby, Blackwell, App Md 2009, Weinstein, Woolf, Marrogi v, Provencher v Buzzell-Plourde Associates, Dalton v Miller, Ill App Ct, Bruce v Byrne-Stevens, Lambert v Carneghi, Murphy, AA Matthews, v Panjabi, Marrogi v Howard, U Mem LR 49, George Jessel MR, Abinger v Ashton, ¦, Phillips, Dyson, LORD KERR, Phillips, Dyson, Tuckey QC, Tuckey, ¦, Tuckey, Saif Ali v, Sydney Mitchell, Chadwick LJ, ¦, Morris, Saif Ali v, Sydney Mitchell, Phillips, Lawrence QC, DYSON, Hedley Byrne, Chadwick LJ, Callaghan, Callaghan, para 4.1, Anthony Clarke MR, Simon Tuckey QC, Saif Ali v, Sydney Mitchell, Tuckey, Saif Ali, Saif Ali, Tuckey, Saif Ali, Arthur Hall, Tuckey, Clyde, Hope, Hutton, Saif Ali, Kirby J, Phillips, Hope, Tuckey, Hope, Wilberforce, Saif Ali, Phillips, Lord Reid, Rondel v Worsley, Hoffmann, Taylor, Saif Ali, Phillips, Hope, Saif Ali, Rondel v Worsley, Saif Ali, Arthur Hall, Hope, Rondel v Worsley, Saif Ali, Hoffmann, Lawrence, Hoffmann, ¦, Hoffmann

CARDINAL: 2002, 1, 740, 38, 38, 26, two, 76, 263, 1, one, 1, 1, 191, 2002, 1, 1, 142, 2001, 1, 446, 460, 461, 446, 480, 1905, 488, 49, 1, 184, 488, 2, One, 661, 755, 2000, 100, 38, 37, 1, 38, 38, 1, 191, 227, 229, 251, 272, 284, 249, 229, 252, 253, 268, 270, five, 283, 214, 1, 180, 187, 218, two, 222, 230, 233, 671, 679, 237, 698, 2000, two, 225, 17, one, two, 1, 818, 841, 456, 228, 227, 106, 92, 14, 2002, 1, 2, 208, 2000, 223, 1, 100, 223, 1, 39, 2, 166, 95, 245, 71, 464, 3, 936, two, 971, 245, 805, 102, 702, 460, 341, 27, 711, 984, 784, 776, 6, 2d 781, 70, 841, 2d 671, 740, 2d 186, 781, 2d 518, 14, 805, one, 38, 2001, 1, 17, 358, 373, 2000, 75, 2002, 1, 1, 251, 222B, 42, 2000, 1, 2, 22, 3, 2008, 1, 1, 2002, 1, 489A, 2001, 1, 457C., 724F, 74, 209, 238, 137, 42, two, two, 214E, three, 2, 214D, 468F., Two, three, 214E, 692F

GPE: Stanton, Liverpool, Fortis, Stanton, Callaghan, Bretherton, Marrinan, Vibart, Darker, Stanton, Stanton, Callaghan, Stanton, England, the United States, Reynolds, Australia, South Australia, Canada, Carnahan v Coates, the United States, the United States, the United States, the United States, United States, the United States, England, US, the United States, the State of Washington, California, Missouri, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Louisiana, England, Stanton, Stanton, Palmer, Pitched, Stanton, England, Wales, Palmer, Stanton, Palmer, Stanton, Palmer, Darker

DATE: 2000, 22 January 2010, 14 March 2001, 20 March 2001, May 2003, 29 July 2003, PTSD, September 2003, 17 February 2004, 10 December 2004, 400 years &, 1585, 1873, 1959, 1772, 55, 1963, 1969, 2002, 2003, Roy v Prior, 1971, 1981, 1992, 1980, 1995, 75, 1969, 1964, 1969, 18 months', 1980, 1974, 1996, 75, 2006, 1390, 2007, 6 November 2009, 2007, 2004, 2005, 1995, 1982, weekend, November 2010, 1982, 1999, 1992, a later date, 1873, 2005, 2005, the last 20 years or so, recent years, 2005, 2005, 2007, 2007, 2003, 2006, 2007, 1990, 2004, 2010, 1982, the last 20 years, 2d 1118, 1132, 1983, 1983, 1998, 1999, 2002, recent years, 2008, Pa. 1999, 2001, 2d 1118, 2007-2008, 1873, 2006, 1390, 2007, 1992, 1980, 1969, 1980, 1982, 1964, 2005, 2007, 1027, 1992, 1980, 1969, 488F, today, 1999, 1999, 456H, November 2010

ORG: QB 75, the Court of Appeal, RSC, the Administration of Justice Act 1969, the Motor Insurance Bureau, the Court of Appeal, QB 255, Kelly CB, the Court of Appeal, Hall v Simons, the House of Lords, the House of Lords, Lordships, Craighead, AC 470, AC 480, the House of Lords, the House of Lords, The House of Lords, the House of Lords, Evans v London Hospital Medical College (University of London, QB 483, High Court, the House of Lords, AC 198 &ldquo, Bedfordshire County Council, the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords Lord Browne-Wilkinson, London Hospital, Stanton v Callaghan, the Court of Appeal, RSC, Otton LJ, the House of Lords, Otton LJ's, RSC, Court, Co Ltd, Partners Ltd, AC 465, the House of Lords, Upjohn, Lordships, Upjohn, Upjohn, Lordships, AC, The House of Lords, the New Zealand Court of Appeal, Bar, Hall v Simons, Steyn, Lordships, the Court of Appeal, Hall v Simons, Hall v Simons, Thorpe LJ, QB 462, LJ, Bond Solon, CPR, Court, Otton LJ, General Medical Council, QB 462, the Court of Appeal, Phillips v Symes, Phillips v Symes, Hall v Simons, FSR, Journal of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, CPR, LJ, NHS, LJ, Court, Hall v Simons, AC 529, Expert, Arthur J S Hall and Co v Simons, the Serious Fraud Office, Suffice, QB 483, McHugh J, D'Orta-Ekenaike v, Phillips, Commonwealth, the High Court of Australia, D'Orta-Ekenaike, the Supreme Court of New Zealand, the Ontario Court of Appeal, Kingston (Police Services Board, Sovereign Motor Inns Pty Ltd v, James v Medical Board of South Australia, Commonwealth v Griffiths, Deep v College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Sovereign Motor Inns, Court, Court, the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London University, Wilberforce, Buttes Gas, State, Court, Federal Rules of Evidence, the United States Supreme Court, Briscoe v LaHue, the Supreme Court, McNall v Frus, NE 2d 238, Associates Engineers Inc, Arthur Young and Co, Michigan Inc v Jackson-Cross Co, Conn.Super, Ct.2000, Boyes-Bogie, Horvitz and Associates, La.2002, Liability Exposure and Case Law, the Court of Appeal, General Medical Council, QB 462, Phillips, High Court, QB 483, the House of Lords, Arthur J S Hall and Co v Simons, the Court of Appeal, AC 198, Co Ltd, Partners Ltd, AC 465, the Civil Justice Council, the Expert Witness Institute, the Academy of Experts, QB 462, the Criminal Procedure Rules, Practice Direction, QB 483, the House of Lords, AC 198, the Court of Appeal, the House of Lords, Arthur J S Hall and Co v Simons, Property Corpn plc Ltd, the Serious Fraud Office, Darker v Chief Constable, the House of Lords, the House of Lords

NORP: Kirwans, Kirwans, Kirwans, Kirwans, Kirwans, Kirwans, Kirwans, Kirwans, Scottish, Thorpe, American, American, English

ORDINAL: second, first, secondly, first, first, secondly, first, second, First, first, 4th, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, second, First, first, second, third, first, secondly, first, second, second, first

PRODUCT: LR 8, LR 8, Jurs, 729D, 446D

TIME: 464; ii

FAC: Watson v M'Ewan, Palmer v Durnford Ford, Palmer v Durnford Ford, pp 101-102, the Bond Solon, Lai v Chamberlains, AC 888, Palmer v Durnford Ford, Arthur Hall, Arthur Hall, the Bond Solon, Arthur Hall, Arthur Hall

MONEY: some £77,000, only some £21,000

EVENT: Cane, La 2002

PERCENT: 2nd ed

QUANTITY: 698 Lord

WORK_OF_ART: The Expert Witness: Partisan, Thorpe LJ, Varghese v Landau, 488H Mr, Evidence

LOC: Mikado, Howarth Asia Pacific, the Middle Temple's

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //