Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Pang Ah San Vs. Singapore Medical Council

Decided On : Nov-29-2013

Court : Singapore Supreme Court

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Medical Registration Act, the Medical Registration Act, the Medicines Act, the Health Products Act, Section 2.2.2, the Medical Registration Act

CARDINAL: 1, one, 2, 3., 4, 50, 5., 6, two, 8, one, 174, 9, 10, 11, 740, 12, 741, 3, 3, 15, 13, 15F, 14F to 30F, two, two, two, 14, 740, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, only two, 23, 24, 4.1.4, 1, 2, 3, 25, 13, 584, 1, 26, 27, 1, 28, 2, 45, 4.1.4, 29, 30, 2, 31, 32, 2.25, 32, 3.9, 33, 3.7, 34, one, 3.7, 35, 2, 3.10, 3.14, 4.4, 5.6, 5.20, 5.21, 5.22, 5.23, 38, 13, 13, 39, 40, 43, 1, 44, 24, 3, 1, 1, 47, One, 48, 33, 49, 2013, 1, 42, 50, 51, 46, one, 52, two, 28, 45, 33, 46, 21, 621, 56, 57, 1, 46, 1, one, 61]-[62, one, 58, 59, 2, 60, 3, 1, 21, 99, two, 61, 3.21, 3.23, 3.21, 3.22, 3.23, 62, 102, one, 2.1, 2.3, 2.1, 2.3, 63, 57, 623, 64, 3.24, 3.24, 174, 248, 65, 66, 9, 313, 9.3, two, 9.4, 9.5, two, 9.6, two, 67, 37]-[38, 39, 68., 27, 1, 3, 1, 69, 120, 70, 30, 2, 6.5, 8), 6.5, 6.6, 71, 3, 72, 37, 73, 75, 75, two, one, 100]-[103, 79, 110, more than one, 1, 82, 83, 29, 2, 84, 109, 85, 3, two, 87, two, 88, 57, 89, two, one, two, one, two, two, one, two, one, two, one, more than one, two, two, two, two, two, one, 93, 94, two, 95, 96, 97, 8(4):154, 154, 3, 98, 8, 123, 3, Two, 4, 5B, 3, 99, 100, 101, 3, 3, two, 102, 103, one, three, 723, 104, one, three, 105, three, 106, 107, three, only one, 108, 64, 68, 1, 109, two, 4 111, 112

ORG: the Disciplinary Committee, the Singapore Medical Council, Appellant, the Singapore Medical Council's Ethical Code and Ethical Guidelines, Mount Alvernia Medical Centre, MRA, the Complaints Committee, CC, The Notice of Inquiry, Appellant, Mount Alvernia Hospital, Mdm Goh, the Singapore Medical Council's Ethical Code and Ethical Guidelines, The Loop PEG Tube, the Loop PEG Tube, the Loop PEG Tube, Loop PEG Tube, the Loop PEG Tube, the Singapore Medical Journal, Pang A S, Singapore Medical Journal, PEG, PEG, SGN Pte Ltd, PEG, Prof Ti's, PEG, Pang A S, Singapore Medical Journal, SGN Pte Ltd's, Patient, Appellant, the High Court, MRA, HPA, MA, HPA, the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, Clarendon Press, MA, HPA, MA, HPA, Institution Review Board, the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, The Ministry of Health, the Ethical Guidelines on Research Involving Human Subjects, the National Medical Ethics Committee, NMEC, The BAC Guidelines, The National Medical Ethics Committee, the Bioethics Advisory Committee, BAC, the Singapore Cabinet, BAC, the Life Sciences Ministerial Committee, Bioethics Advisory Committee Singapore, Research Involving Human Subjects Guidelines, Direct Human Biomedical Research, IRB, BAC, Direct Human Biomedical Research, Direct Human Biomedical Research, Direct Human Biomedical Research, Indirect Human Biomedical Research, Indirect Human Biomedical Research, Indirect Human Biomedical Research, Direct Human Biomedical Research, the Ministry of Health, BAC Guidelines, the Singapore Medical Council, Ministry of Health, Direct Human Biomedical Research, IRB, Indirect Human Biomedical Research, IRB, the BAC Guidelines, IRB, BAC, The Responsibilities of Institutional Review Boards, IRB, all Human Biomedical Research, IRB, all Human Biomedical Research, Review of Scientific Merits, Human Biomedical Research, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, the Ministry of Health, IRB, HBR, IRB, HBR, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, Singapore Medical Council, DH Cowan, Medical Law Review, NMEC, Guidelines, NMEC, NMEC, BAC, the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Health, Operational Guidelines for Institutional Review Boards, Innovative Therapy versus Experimentation, the BAC Guidelines, Human Biomedical Research, MOH, the Private Hospitals and Medical Clinics Act, IRB, IRB, Legal and Regulatory Responses, the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, IRB, the Belmont Report, United States National Commission, the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, Behavioral Research, The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Protection of Human Subjects of Research, World Medical Association, Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, the DC Decision, Prof Ti's, the loop- PEG, Diagram 2, the DC Decision, the DC Decision, Prof Ti's, Seow-Choen's, Seow-Choen's, the DC Decision, Seow-Choen, Prof Ti's, Prof Ti's, Prof Ti's, Diagram 2, Diagram 3, Prof Ti's, Prof Ti's, PEG, Diagram 3, Diagram 3, Prof Ti's, Pang AS, Gastrostomy, Appellant, Diagram 2, SGN Pte Ltd's, Diagram 2, Diagram 2, Appellant, Diagram 2, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Letters of Patents

GPE: DC, DC, Singapore, Singapore, DC, DC, DC, anaesthesia, Singapore, anaesthesia, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, DC, DC, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, DC, Gobinathan, Gobinathan, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, Gobinathan, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, Gobinathan, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, Diagram, AS Pang, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC, DC

PERSON: Pang Ah San, Lee Kheng, Rev Ed, Patient, Liew Swee Fong, Patient, Patient, Patient, Patient, Patient, Tan Kwang Chuan, Mdm Tan Sok Hia, Patient, Pang Ah San, Lee Kheng, Patient, Chia Siew Cheng, Chia Siew Cheng, Patient, Rev Ed, Cap, Chia Siew Cheng, Tan Kwang Chuan, Patient, Mdm Tan Sok Hia, Patient, Ms Liew, Patient, Teo Eng Kiong, Dr Pang, Dr Chia, Francis Seow-Choen, Dr Chia's, Patient, Patient, Patient, Patient, Patient, Rev Ed, Rev Ed, Gobinathan, Lim Pin, Governance Framework, Patient, James v Gunapathy, James Khoo, Chai Ling, Chai Ling', James Khoo, James Khoo, Patient, Asst Prof Chan's, Asst Prof Chan's, Cap, Cap, Therapy, Assoc Prof, Terry Kaan Sheung-Hung's, Terry, Yeo Khee Quan ed, Governance Framework, Patient, Patient, Patient, James Khoo, Seow-Choen's, Seow-Choen's, Dr Seow-Choen, Dr Seow-Choen's, Dr Seow-Choen, James Khoo, Seow-Choen's, Patient, James Khoo, Dr Seow-Choen, Seow-Choen, Appellant, Appellant, Seow-Choen's, Seow-Choen, Appellant, Dr Seow-Choen's, Seow-Choen, LIN, LIN, Diagram 3, Ho ST, Pavel Kohout gen ed, LOOPPEGG„¢, Patient, Diagram 3, Patient, Diagram 4, Patient, Patient, Ms Liew, Patient, Ms Liew's, LIN, LIN, LIN, Patient, Patient, Ms Liew, Patient, Patient, Patient, Patient, Patient

WORK_OF_ART: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, PEG, CC, ECEG").Particulars (i)   Clause 4.1.4 of the ECEG, Prof Ti", The Appellant, Diagram 1, Diagram 2, Diagram 3, Diagram 4, 2nd Edition, 1989, IRB, NMEC Guidelines, Innovative Therapy versus Experimentation, Innovative Therapy versus Experimentation, Asst Prof Chan, Legal and Regulatory Responses to Innovative Treatment, Legal and Regulatory Responses to Innovative Treatment', Legal and Regulatory Responses to Innovative Treatment at p 109, the Declaration of Helsinki, Journal of Minimal Access Surgery 2012, The Twin-stoma Gastrostomy, Appellant

PRODUCT: Mdm Goh, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

DATE: today, 26 years', the last 18 years, 84 years of age in 2008, 7 July 2008, two days later, 20 days later, 8 August 2008, between 7 July 2008, 9 July 2008, June 2008, 7 July 2008, eight days, 2009, 50(7, 740¬742, more than a century, today, about 30 years, 2009, 12 October 2011, 1 December 2010, 22, 7 July 2008, Cap 176, 1985, 122D, 2008, 2010, 1997, 25 June 1998, December 2000, 2004, November 2004, January 2006, December 2007, 36, 37, 14, 2 41, 42, 2002, 1024, 45, 46, 54, 55, 1985, 2013, Section 2.2.1, December 2007, 2004, this day, 18 April 1979, October 2013, 27 November 2013, 3 74, 76, 80, 81, 2007, 86, TWO STOMAS 90, 23 July 2012, more than three decades, 2011, 2011, 2011, 84 years old, 7 July 2008, 11 October 2007, 31 August 2009, 2011

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Maxwell Asia

ORDINAL: first, third, first, first, second, first, second, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, second, third, third, First, Second, first, First, Second, fourth

NORP: LOOPPEG3G, Innovative, Maetani

MONEY: 10,000, 78]-[107

PERCENT: 70%

FAC: Gobinathan Devathasan v Singapore Medical Council, Tracey Evans Chan, Kaan Sheung-Hung

QUANTITY: two square knots

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //