Tang Yong Kiat Rickie Vs. Sinesinga Sdn Bhd

Decided On : Mar-11-2014

Court : Singapore Supreme Court

LAW: the Bankruptcy Act, Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(a, the Bankruptcy Act, the Bankruptcy Act, section 65, the Bankruptcy Act, the Bankruptcy Act, section 6(3, the Malaysian Bankruptcy Act 1967, the Insolvency Act, MLJ 69, section 123(1)(a, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(a, the Bankruptcy Act, the Bankruptcy Act, section 231, section 152(2, the Bankruptcy Act, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(a, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(c, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(c, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(c, section 123(1)(c, the Bankruptcy Act, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(c, the Bankruptcy Act, section 123(1)(c, section 123(1)(c, the Bankruptcy Act

PERSON: Chan Wei Sern, Paul AR, Rev Ed, Rev Ed, Ian Fletcher, Latifah Bte Hussainsa, Perbadanan Pembangunan, Stephen Wong Leong Kiong, Ross, Re Skelton, Re Stanger, Geisel, Wan, Rev Ed

CARDINAL: 1, two, 2, three, 3, two, two, 9 million, 4., 5., 6, 7, three, 8, 9, 28, 10, two, 11, 12, 2, 2011, 4, 1, 1894, 2, 1, 817, 22, 374, 165, 22, 2000, 13, two, 1, 5, 979, 22, 436, 2, 14, 15, 2, two, two, one, 17, 737, 370, 14, 716, 199, 1922, 2, 12(h, 13(a, 38,209,683.24, only S$9.9 million, 19, 9, 20, 21, 22, three, 23, 24, 38,209,683.24, 25, 26, 27, 22, 28, 1, 453, 53, two, 29, 30, 1)(c, three, 31, two, 33, 34, 1, 2, 3, 4, one, 35, 36, one, 37

GPE: Singapore, Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, London, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, UK, Harta, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Switzerland, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Malaysia, Malaysia, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

DATE: many years, the 2nd, 3rd, the 1st, 20, 2009, 1986, 11 February 2009, 16 March 2010, 1985, 5 August 2011, the 1st, 12 January 2012, The 2nd, 3rd, 8 October 2012, the 1st, the 1st, 2009, 1986, 2005, 1933, 1995, 1963, 1867, 1936, 1883, 2004, 1895, 1 QB 85, 1903, 1882, 1963, 1965, 1992, 1)(a, 16, 1928, 1929, 1880, 18, the 1st, the 1st, 2004, 12 January 2012, almost three years, seven months, almost one year, nine months, 2010, monthly, monthly, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, the 1st, 2007, 32, 2010

NORP: Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, English, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian, Malaysian

ORG: the High Court of Malaya, the Official Assignee, Metrosharp Sdn Bhd and Madihill Development Sdn Bhd, United Merchant Finance Berhad, UMFB, the Suit 893 Judgment, the Suit 888 Judgment, the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth, the Official Assignee, the Malaysian High Court, Maxwell, the Hong Kong Bankruptcy Ordinance, HSBC Bank Malaysia Bhd, Hongkong Bank, Sama Credit, Re Davenport, BPIR 636, Bank of Scotland v Bennett, Re Painter, CH, Re Davenport, Eric Street Properties Ltd, Re Noble, United Malayan Banking Corp Bhd, the Bankruptcy Rules, Official Assignee, the Official Assignee, Official Assignees, Official Assignees, CH 362, the English Court of Appeal, Strongmaster Ltd v Kaye and Ors, BPIR 335, Suffice, Official Assignees, Goh Nellie v Goh Lian Teck, Suffice

ORDINAL: first, 1st, 1st, 1st, 4th, first, 1st, 1st, 1st, 4th, first, first, 1st, First, First, Secondly, first, first, second, 1st, 1st, 1st, first, 1st, first, second, first, second, First, Secondly, First, Secondly, third, 1st, first, second, second, third, second, third, 1st, 1st, second, 1st

QUANTITY: about RM 11 million

PRODUCT: the "Suit 893 Judgment, the "Suit 888 Judgment, Suit 893 Judgment, the Suit 888 Judgment, Suit 888 Judgment

WORK_OF_ART: 2 All ER

LANGUAGE: English

MONEY: about S$9.9 million

PERCENT: less than 20%