Deepaindra Kumar, Ghaziabad (Up). Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary (Revenue), New Delhi and Others

Decided On : Jan-02-2014

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

LAW: Rule 10 of the CCS, Rule 10, Section 7(3, Rule 10, Rule 10, FR 53, Rule 10, Rule 10, Rule 10, Rule 10, Rule 10, Section 19(4, the Administrative Tribunals Act, Section 19(4, the Administrative Tribunals Act, Section 19, Rule 10, the Administrative Tribunals Act, Rule 10, Rule 10 of the CCS, Rule 10, the Rule 10, Rule 10, Rule 10, Rule 10(2, Rule 10(5)(c, Rule 10, Section 482, Rule 10(2, Rule 10(2, Rule 10(7, Rule 10(2, Rule 10(7, Rule 10, Rule 10

PERSON: G. George Paracken, Dipak Mali, Notification, Petitioner, Notification, Bench, Home Deptt, V. Bimal Kumar Mohanty, Railal Ratilal Patel V. State, V.P. Gindroniya, Tarak Nath Ghosh, Kumar Bajaj, Rajiv Kumar, Rajiv Kumar, Rajiv Kumar, Balvantrai Ratilal Patel v. State of, 04.01.2010, Ritika Chawla, M.K. Bhardwaj, Notification, Dipak Mali

CARDINAL: 1., 03.02.2012, 2, 1, 2, 30.04.2012, 30.04.2012, 6, 03.02.2012, 3., 2, 222, 6, one hundred and eighty, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 4, 5, 6, 6., 6, 3, 8, 9, 4, 6, 10, 6, 11, 6, 12, 6, 11.06.2002, 02.04.2004, 11.06.2002, 02.04.2004, 10, 6, 02.04.2004, 6, 6, 7., 10(2, 2, 51, 5, 431, 2, 577, 3, 448, 715, only one, 17, 6, 516, 30, 32, 8., two, 23.10.2003, 10(2, 10, 1, 2, 5)(a, 5(b, 6, one hundred and, 1, 2, 2, 6, 6, 516, 10(2, 2, 8, 10(2, 10(4, 2, 5(a, 2).The, 10(2, 15, 6, 16., 5(b, 5(a, 5(b, more than one, 5(a, 17, 9, FIR No.33/2009, 10, 11, 31.12.2009, 12, 13., 14, 15, 8., 6, 20.10.2012, 6, 11, 20.10.2012

ORG: Applicant, Respondents, CCA, Applicant, CCA, FIR, the Review Committee, Committee, Applicant, Respondents, CCA, the Review Committee, CCA, Applicant, Respondents, ITO, Applicant, Respondents, Tihar Jail, Applicant, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Central Civil Services, CCA, Sub-Rules, the Review Committee, a Review Committee, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Sub-Rules, the Review Committee, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Sub-Rules, the Original Application, the High Court, O.A.No.540/2004, the High Court, the High Court, Special Leave Petition, the Union of India, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Tribunal on, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Reviewing Committee, Petitioners, the High Court, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, Respondents, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Courts, Tribunal, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the High Court, Union of India, the High Court, the Special Leave Petition, U.O.I., CBI, Tribunal, Respondents, the High Court, under:- œIt, the Review Committee, Respondents, Applicant, CCA, the Review Committee, Committee, Applicant, Applicant, Respondents, Respondents, Applicant, A.A. Farooquee Vs, U.O.I., The Honourable Supreme Court, State, Principal, R.P.Kapur V. Union of India, Maharastra, the State of Madhya Pradesh and Others, Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Court, Tribunal, Applicant, the Apex Court, U.O.I. Vs, Rajeev, under:- œ29, High Court's, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the Honble High Court, W.P., No.7675/2010 Union of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, CCA, the Department of Personnel, CCA, CCA, Tribunal, CCA, under:- œRule, Government, State, the Indian Audit and Accounts Service, the Indian Audit and Accounts Service, Government, the Review Committee, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Rajiv Kumar, the Supreme Court, CCA, The Supreme Court, CCA, under:- œ14, Appellate, Allahabad, Government of India, Ministry of Personnel, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Rohini Courts, Government, Tribunal, the Review Committee, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CCA, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Rajiv Kumars, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Review Committees, Review Committee, the Supreme Court, Rajiv Kumars, the Review Committee, the Review Committee, Tribunal, the Respondents Shri R.V. Sinha, CCA, Applicant, the Review Committee, the Apex Court, Tribunal, A.A. Farooquee, the Supreme Court, Rajeev Kumar, the High Court, Pramod Kumar Bajaj, CCA, Respondents, Applicant, Respondents

DATE: 1965, 31.01.2012, 1965, 31.01.2012, 24.04.2012, 23.04.2012, 31.01.2012, 7th January, 2004, the period of, 90 days, 90 days, 1965, 90 days, 23.04.2012, 1965, 180 days, 24.04.2012, 04.04.2012, 02.04.2012. 4, 2010, 1965, 23rd December, 2003, ninety days, a period ninety days, the expiry of ninety days, 2nd June, 2004, 10th August, 2002, the expiry of 90 days, 29th March, 2005, 10th August, 2002, 2nd June, 2004, July, 2004, the expiry of three months, the expiry of 90 days, 2nd June, 2004, 90 days, 2nd June, 2004, 2nd June, 2004, 20th October, 2004, 2004, July, 2004, 18th August, 2004, 1985, 20th October, 2004, 8th April, 2005, 1985, 20th October, 2004, the expiry of 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, 1985, 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, 90 days, 08.02.2007, 26.06.2002 w.e.f., 08.02.2007, 23.07.2009, 26.06.2002, 90 days, 21.09.2004, 90 days, 1965, 24.04.2012, 180 days, 09.11.2012, 1091/2006, 1994, 1964, 1968, 1970, 1971 3, Kumar 2003, 07.12.2012, 1965, 1965, 1965, 1965, the expiry of ninety days, a period of ninety days, the expiry of ninety days, ninety days, the ninety days, 2003, 1965, Rule 10(5)(a, 1997, 10.01.1986, 1973, 08.08.1977, 1965, 12.03.2010, 90 days, 12.03.2010, the expiry of 90 days, the expiry of 90 days, 12.03.2010, 12.03.2010, 31.08.2010, 1965, 23.12.2003, ninety days, ninety days, 23.04.2012, 180 days, 180 days, 19.10.2012, 180 days, 1965, a period of, one month

TIME: 48 hours, forty-eight hours, forty-eight hours, forty-eight hours, more than 48 hours

GPE: CCS, Rules, O.A., OA, Forums, OA, C.B.I., OA, Orissa, OA, Delhi, CCS, CCS, CCS, CCS, CCS, OA, OA

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

PRODUCT: Respondent

NORP: Rules

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, first

WORK_OF_ART: 04.01.2010