Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ntpc Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others

Decided On : Jan-27-2014

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

LAW: the Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 10, the Tariff Regulations, Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulations 9, Regulation 11, the Tariff Regulations 2009, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 9, Regulation 9. 31, the Tariff Regulations, Second Amendment) Regulations, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, the Regulation 7 and Regulation 9, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 9, the Generating Station, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 3, Regulation 9, the Regulation 18 of 2004 Regulation and Regulation 9 of 2009 Regulation, Regulation 19, Regulation 19, the Regulation 19, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 19, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 9, the Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 19, the Tariff Regulations, Tariff Regulations, Regulation 19, Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 19, Tariff Regulations, Regulation 19, the Regulation 19, Regulation 19

PERSON: M. Karpaga Vinayagam, NTPC, Vindhyanchal Station-II, Vindhyanchal Station-I, NTPC, Regulations, Regualtion-9, ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦, ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦, ¦¦¦¦¦, ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦, Regulations, Regualtion-9, Regualtion-7, Anr, B. T Shankar, Reasons, Reasons, Reasons, Reasons, Reasons, Maintenance Expenses, Reasons

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 53, 4., 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8), 9, II, 10, 7,9,10, 19, 5, four, four, 6, 7(2, 1.4.2009, 7(2, 7(2, 8, 9, four, 7(2, 2, 10, 4, four, 11, four, 12, 7(2, 2, 14, 7(2, 15, 7(2, 7(2, 16, 3(8, three, 7(2, 21.6.2011, 1.4.2009, 7(2, 9, 7(2, 7(2, 9(1, 21.6.2011, 19(e, 7(2, 7(2, 1, 17, 18, 7(2, 2, 1.4.2009, 9, 01.04.2009, 2, 19, 20, 21, 22, 3, 23, 24, 11, 25, 26, 21.6.2011, 1, 8, 9, 2, 1.4.2009, 1, 2, 1.4.2009, 27, 1, 7(2, 29, 30, 7(2, 2, two, 9, 2, 21.6.2011, 1, 2, 9, 1, 9, 2, 2, 7(2, 9, 2, 1, 2, 2, 32, 10, 34, 2, 16, 1.4.2009, 17, 1.4.2009, 35, 2, 36, 1.4.2009, 38, 39, 9, 40, 2, 41, three, 1, 1, 2, 43, two, 2, two, 2, 45, two, 48, 4, 685, 3, 4, 3, 1, 2, 1, 51, 1, 2, 1.4.2009, 52, 55, 56, 2, 9, 18(2, 18(2, 57, two, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, one, 64, 65, two, 66, 21.6.2011, 21.6.2011, 67, 21.6.2011, 21.6.2011, 69, 73, 74, 2, 75, two, 79, two, 80, 19, 1, 81, 19, 1, 10, 83, 84, 1, 19, 21.1, 21.4, 86, 87, 88, 21.6.2011, 89, 1.4.2009, 19, 21.6.2011, 21.6.2011, 90, 91, 19, 19, 94, two, 95, 96

ORG: the Central Commission, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulations, Generating Units, Generating Company, the Central Government, The Central Commission, Respondents, NTPC, the Impugned Orders, the Central Commission, NTPC, the Central Commission, Tariff Regulations, Petitions, The Central Commission, the Impugned Orders, the Central Commissions Tariff Regulations, Appellant, Appeals, Impugned Orders, Generating Stations, the Central Commission, Appellant, Respondents, Central Commission, Tariff Regualtions, Tariff Regulations, Respondents, the Central Commission, Tariff Regulations, Appeals, the Non Consideration, Tariff Regulations, Respondents, Regulations, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Impugned Orders, NTPC, Commission, Commission, Regulation 7 of the 2009 Regulations, Commission, un, Commission, Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commissions Notification, Renovation and Modernisation, NTPC, the Central Commission, NTPC, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, NTPC, Commission, Regulation 7, the Central Commission, Regulation, The Central Commission, Tariff Regualtions-2009, the Central Commission, Commission, Regualtion-9, Regualtion-7, Regualtion-9, Capital Cost, Commission, Commission, Commission, un, Commission, Commission, un, Capital Expenditure, Commission, COD, un, COD, the Central Commission, Generating Stations, Regulation 7, the Central Commission, Regualtion-9, the Central Commission, CERC, Regulations, Regulations, COD, COD, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Detailed Project Report, Regualtion-7, Regulation 7, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, un, the Commercial Operation Date, the Capital Cost of, the Commercial Operation Date, Regulations, Regulation 7, Commission, Central Commission, as œmeans, the Honble Supreme Court, Bharat Coop, Bank (, Coop Bank Employees Union, œmeans, Honble Supreme Court, the Central Commission, Regulation, Regulation 7, Commercial Operation, Additional Capital, Regulation 7, the Capital Cost as per Regulation 7, Commission, un, Capital Expenditure, Commission, COD, un, the Central Commission, the Statement of Objects, Commission, Commission, COD, COD, SOR, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, The Central Commission, The Central Commission, Regulations, Commission, the Central Commission, the Statement of Objects, Appellants, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, COD, un, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Appellant, Regualtion-9, Sub Clause 1, Regulation-7(1)refers, Regualtion-9, Regulation 7, œminor, Working Capital, the Central Commission, Appellant, Regulation-7, Respondents, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Respondents, the Statement of Objects, NTPC, NTPC, NLC, NTPC, Commissions, NTPC, the Statement of Objects, Appellant, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Regulations, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Regualtion-9, the Central Commission, The Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Statement of Objects, the Central Commission, MW, NTPC, DVC, NTPC, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Regulation 7, Tariff, Appeals

DATE: 2009, 2012, 2013, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 19, 2009, 2009, 2006, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009-2014, 2009, 7(1, 1.4.2009, the respective years, 2009-14, the respective year, 2009-2014, 2009, 1992, 2009, 2009-14, 31st March of the year closing after, two years of the year, the last quarter of a year, 31st March of the year, three years of the year, 2009, 1.4.2009, the respective year, 2009-14, 15 years, the respective years, 2009-14, the year 2009-14., 2009, 2011, 1.4.2006, 1.4.2006, 2009, 25 years, 33, 37, the respective year, 15 years, 42, 44, 2009, 46, 47, 2007, 49, 2001, 50, 15 years, 54, 2009, 2004, 58, 2004-09, one more year, 2-3 years, 11th year, 1 to 2 years, the year, the past., 2009, 19.1.2009, 15 years, 2009, 70, 72, the 1st, 76, 78, 2006, 2009, the year, the year, 15 or 20 years, the year, 85, 2009, 2009-14, 15 years, 2009, 2009, 2004, one month, 9(2, 19(1, 13th February, 2014

LOC: the Batch of this Appeal, Clauses, Respondent

PRODUCT: Appellant, Petitions, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 8 and Regulation 9 of 2009, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Regulation 9, Appellant, Appellant, Regulation 9, Appellant, Regulation 3 (3, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

ORDINAL: first, first, Second, 2nd

GPE: Dadri, DC, Mumbai, Smt Vijayalakshmma, DC

EVENT: Unchahar-II, Regulation 3, Regulation 9(2, Regulation 9(2, Regulation 10. 13, the 2009 Regulations, Regulation 7, Regulation 8, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, Regulation 9, Regulation 2009, Regulation 8, Regulation 3, the 2004 Regulation, Regulation 18 of the 2004 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, the 2004 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, Regulation 9, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations, the 2009 Regulations as œadditional, the Regulation 9 of the 2009 Regulations, Regulation 19, Regulation 19, Years of OperationAs, the 2009 Regulations, Regulation 19, Regulation 19, Regulation 19(e

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, Regulation 9.2 of the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 9 of 2009, Thermal/Gas Generating Stations, the Notification of the 2009 Regulations, Regulation

PERCENT: 70%, 30%, less than 30%, 20%

FAC: Singrauli STPS, Operation

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //