Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Kansan News Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Decided On : May-02-2014

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

LAW: Section 53-B of the Competition Act, Section 19(1)(a, Section 4 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3(4)(b, Section 5 of the Act, Section 4(2)(b)(i, Section 3(3, Section 3(4)(d, Section 3 of the Act, Section 27(b, Section 27 of the Act, the Telecommunication Regulations, the Telecommunication Regulations, section 4(2, the Competition Act, section 4(2, Section 4(2)(c, Section 4(2)(c, Section 4, Section 3(4)(d, Section 3(4)(d, the Telecommunication Regulations, Section 2(m, Section 4(2)(c, the Telecommunication Regulations

PERSON: HON'BLE MEMBER, Gurdeep Singh, Appellants Nos, Gurdeep Singh, Appellants Nos, Singh Badal, Shiromani Akali Dal, Youth Akali Dal, Appellants, Gurdeep Singh, Chandigarh, Hathway Sukhamrit, Hathway, Gurdeep Singh, Appellants, Appellants, MSO, Appellants, Chandigarh, Appellants, MSO, Appellants, Appellants, MSO

CARDINAL: 1., 26/2011, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 1, 1 to 3, over 90%o, 1, 1, 1, 1 to 3, one, 1, 1, 3., 4(2)(c, 4, four, 5., four, 4, 1 to 3, 200, 27,321,376/-, two, 4(2)(b)(i, 4(2)(c, 8, 9, 10, 1, 2, 3, 11, 1, 1, 12, 1, 1, two, 13, 1, 6,83,72,287/-, 61,31,664/-, 58,97,189/-, 14, 1herein, 80, over 550, 15, 1, 16, 1, 17, 18, 19, 40, only 56,000, about 45, 20, 1, 2, 1, 21, one, one, two, 22, 1, 1, 23, two, two, two, 1, 24, 25, 26

DATE: 2002, 'Day, about two months, August, 2010, October, 2010, December, 2011, 20.02.2010, 2004, the financial year 2010¬11, 90 days

ORG: the Competition Commission of India, Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union Territory of Chandigarh, Datacom Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Creative Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Punjab and Union Territory of Chandigarh, the State of Punjab, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, the State of Punjab, Appellants, the State of Punjab, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, the Appellants, Respondent No, Appellants, the State of Punjab, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services, Broadcasters, Multi-System Operators, Local Cable Operators, MSO, LCO, Terrestrial TV, Cable TV, DTH, IP TV, IP TV, DTH, Punjab State, the Fastway Group, the Appellants Group, Cable TV, the Appellants Group, the Appellants Group, ESPN, The Telecom Disputes Settlement, Appellate Tribunal, TDSAT, ESPN, the Appellants/Opposite Parties, the State of Punjab, Fastway, the Fastway Group, Cable TV, Appellants, the Appellants Group, the Appellants Group, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Commission, Data.com Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Creative Cable Network, Appellants, the High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, TDSAT, TDSAT, DTH, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Commission, OP, TRP, TRP, Commission, TRP, OP, Commission, OP, CCI, T.V., MSO, MSO, Appellants, MSO, MSO, MSO, the MSO (Appellants, TDSAT, MSO, TDSAT, Statute

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Fastway, Fastway, Fastway, Punjab, Punjab

ORDINAL: third, Second, third, first

PRODUCT: Appellant No. 4, Telecommunication

GPE: India, India, India, India, Sections 4(2)(a, India

WORK_OF_ART: the Appellants Nos

PERCENT: about 2%, 6%

EVENT: ICC World Cup, WWII

LANGUAGE: Fastway

FAC: Telecommunication

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //