Mahavir Singh, Delhi Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Commerce (Supply Division), New Delhi and Another

Decided On : May-30-2014

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

LAW: Section 21, section 20, section 20, the Administrative Tribunals Act, Section 21(3, the Administrative Tribunals Act, The Civil Appeal Nos, costs. 12, 07.03.2011, Section 21, Section 21, Section 21(1, Section 21(2, Section 21(1, Section 21(3, the Administrative Tribunals Act

PERSON: V. Ajay Kumar, Levy, Order, Shri Lohre Ram, B.S. Mathur, Shri T. A. Ansari, Udham Singh Kamal, Shivram Mahadu Gaikwad, Supp, O. A., M. K. Sarkar, Anr, Arabinda Chakraborty, R.P. Singh

CARDINAL: 1., 8.1, 8.4, 8.5., 2., 29.11.1985, 24.10.2000, two, 5, 3., 4., 29.11.1985, 5, 150, 24.10.2000, 5, 24.10.2000, 6., 7, 8, 21, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 9, 10, 11, 8, 304, 7, 3, 231, 8, 631, 2, 14, 425, 14, 10, 115, 15, 16, 13, 3, 3, 14, 5, 10, 13, 15, 16, A5, 10.10.2007, 17, 18, 4, 531, 19

ORG: Peon, Respondents, Shri Lohre Ram, Respondents, UDC, UDC, Court, Peon, the 3rd Respondent, LDC, The OA No.1754/2007, the Honble High Court, the 3rd Respondent, UDC, 3rd Respondent, Peons, Peon, the 3rd Respondent as LDC w.e.f, UDC, A13, the 3rd Respondent as LDC, UDC, the 3rd Respondent, Peons, the 3rd Respondent, Group, Government of India, Department, the 3rd Respondent, The 3rd Respondent, Peons, UDC, SC, the 3rd Respondent, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Honble Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Government of India, the Administrative Tribunal, Union of India, Tribunal, Court, Geology and Mining and, the Court/Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Emphasis, the Judgment of the Honble Apex Court, D.C.S. Negi v. Union of India and Ors, SLP, the Apex Court, the Administrative Tribunal, the Honble Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Emphasis, the Honble Apex Court, Peons, the 3rd Respondent, UDC, Peons, OA No.1754/2007, Peon, Peon, LDC, the Honble Apex Court, K.R. Mudgul

GPE: OA, OA, O.A., Delhi, OA, OA, Ramesh, C. Jacob, OA, OA, OA, OA

TIME: 24.10.2000 i.e., 27.04.2010 i.e.

PRODUCT: Respondent

DATE: 31.10.1984, 18.09.1987, 10.10.2007, a period of, three months, 21.12.2009, 27.04.2010, 27.04.2010, 27.04.2010, the year 1989, more than 20 years, three years, all these years, the year 1989, 1985, one year, six months, one year, six months, the period of, three years, a period of, six months, one year, the period of, six months, 1985, 1997, 12.10.1999, 1999, three years, Section 21(1, 1985, 1995, August 6, 1996, 1994, 3119 of 1997, 2010, 1982, 2000, 2014, years, 25 years, 1985, the year 1989, 24.10.2000, 27.04.2010, the year 2011, 1989, the year 1989, the year 2011, 1986

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, first, Secondly, first, first, first

LOC: the 3rd Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: The Tribunals/High Courts