Sat Pal Kansal Vs. Estate Officer

Decided On : Jan-17-2014

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

LAW: the Right to Information Act, Section 6, Section 12, the Consumer Protection Act, the Right to Information Act, Section 3, the Right to Information Act, Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 3, Section 23, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 13, the CA Act, the CA Act, Section 23, the Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 23, Section 12, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 3, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 19, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 19, the Consumer Protection Act, Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, Section 12, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 12, the Consumer Protection Act, the Right to Information Act, the Right to Information Act, Section 20, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 19(8)(b, Right to Information Act, Section 3, Section 22, the Official Secrets Act, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 22, the Right to Information Act, the Consumer Protection Act

ORG: Sham Sunder, the District Consumer, District Forum, House, No.360828, Chandigarh Administration, House, House, House, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority-Assistant Estate Officer, the Appellate Authority, the Estate Office, Estate Office, House, the Opposite Party, the Opposite Party, The Opposite Party, the District Forum, the Opposite Party, the District Forum, District Forum, the District Forum, the Appellate Authority, the District Forum, the District Forum, House, the Appellate Authority, House, House, The District Forum, the Consumer Complaint, Appellate Authority, Agency, the District Forum, under:- œBar of jurisdiction of Courts: No Court, Patel Roadways Limited, Birla Yamaha Limited, Consumer Forum, Suit, Court, Authorities, Court, Court, a Civil Court, the Consumer Forums, Trans-Mediterranean Airways Vs, SC, the Warsaw Convention, National Commission, Court, View, the Warsaw Convention, Court, Inder Chand Aggarwal, House, the Appellate Authority, Department, Inder Chand Aggarwal, the District Forum, Jurisdiction, The District Forum, Jurisdiction, Civil Suit, Court, Statute, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal/Forum, Court, Revenue Department (Service Division) Government, Karnataka, Revision Petition No.4061, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, T. Pundalika`s, the Karnataka Right to Information Act, The Opposite Party, the District Forum, the Opposite Party, Disputes Redressal Commission, the Appellate Authority, Disputes Redressal Commission, Revision Petition, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the Appellate Authority, Ballarpur Industries Ltd., Eastern Railways, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, B. Vasudeva Shetty Vs, The Kota Co-operative, Agricultural Bank Ltd,, Revision Petition No.3636, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the Opposite Party, Inder Chand Aggarwal, The Appellate Authority, The Public Information, AIR 1996, SC, the Opposite Party, the Consumer Complaint, the Opposite Party, the Opposite Party, the Opposite Party, the Opposite Party, the First Appellate Authority, the Right to Information Act, the Central Information Commission, the State Information Commission, the Public Authority, the Central Information Commission, the State Information Commission, the Central Information Commission, Inder Chand Aggarwal, the Jurisdiction of the District Forum, The District Forum, Mysore City Municipal Corporation, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd., CPJ 1 (, SC, the District Forum, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the Karnataka Right to Information Act, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jurisdiction, the Central Information Commission, the State Information Commission, the Public Authority, Karnataka Right to Information Act, Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd., the District Forum, under:- œ22, Maruti Udyog Ltd. Vs, Statute, the District Forum, Jurisdiction, The District Forum, the District Forum, the District Forum

PERSON: Retd, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, U.T., Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Adviser, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Rs.40,000/-, Jurisdiction, Disputes Redressal Forum, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Chandigarh, Chand Aggarwal, Chandigarh, Jurisdiction, Consumer Forums, Chand Aggarwal, U.T., Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Bench, Chand Aggarwal, S.P. Goel Vs, Chandigarh, S.P. Thirumala Rao Vs, Anr, N.K. Modi, Jurisdiction, S.P. Thirmuala Rao`s case, Ram Lal, Statutes, Statutes, Statutes, Record Room

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 05.01.2011, Rs.30,000/-, 3, 4, 02.04.2013, 5, 6., 8., 9, 10, 11, 13.09.2012, 12, 4, 5, 472, 13, 14, two, 1, 2, 15, 31.03.2011, three, 12, 16, 839, 17, Rs.30,000/-, 18, two hundred and fifty, twenty five thousand, 20, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

DATE: 13.12.2013, 03.12.1991, 03.12.1991, the year 1991, the year 2009, 1991-92, 31.08.2009, 2005, 2010, 28.05.2010, 03.12.1991, 1993, 1995, 1986, Rs.10,000/-, 27.02.2013, 26.04.2013., 2005, 1986, 2005, 31.08.2009, 2005, 28.05.2010, 2005, 1986, 1986, 2005, 2000, 1908, 1986, Rule 29, 2005, 2005, 2005, 2005, 1991-92, 31.08.2009, 2005, 2010, 28.05.2010, 2005, 1986, 2005, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 2010, 2002, 1986, 2002, 1986, 2005, 1986-2007, Consumer 11929, 1986, 2012, 25.02.2013, 2005, 1986, 1986, 2005, 2005, 1986, 2005, Rs.10,000/-, 2005, 2005, 2005, each day, 1986, 2005, 1986, 2005, 28.05.2009, 1996, 2005, 2002, 2002, 1986, 2005, 2002, 2005, 1986, 2005, 1986, 2005, 1923, 19 of 1923, 2005, 1986, 2005, 2005, 1986, 2005, 2005, 1986

GPE: U.T., Vigilance, U.T., Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, Forums, Forums, New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, Stamps Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi

FAC: the Lok Adalat, the District Forums

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, third, fourth, second, fifth

LOC: T. Pundalika Vs

MONEY: Rs.40,000/-

PRODUCT: Judgment, 2 SCC 638

TIME: Right to Information Act