Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raman Kumar Vs. Dlf Homes, Panchkula, Pvt. Limited and Others

Decided On : Apr-25-2014

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

LAW: Section 12, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 3 of the Act, Page 62

PERSON: Dev Raj, Chandigarh, Pinjore, Panchkula, Namrata Gupta, Kalyani Gupta, Ishita Gupta, Mahesh Gupta, R11128, Revindera Singh, Versus State, Haryana, Mahesh Gupta, Neeraj Rana, Colly, Neeraj Rana, Pinjore, Pinjore, Pankaj Chandgothia, Bharminder Singh Mann Vs, Anr, U.T., Chandigarh, lien, Panchkula, Said Complex, Chandigarh, Bharminder Singh Mann Vs, Anr, Record Room

CARDINAL: 1, 2, No.2, 27.4.2011, No.2, 23.11.2011, 28.11.2011, No.2, No.2, 3, No.2, 27.4.2011, 4.2.2012, Rs.4, 8.4.2011, 11.5.2011, 2.6.2011, 6.7.2011, 23.11.2011, 28.11.2011, 2.12.2011, 4.2.2012, 4, No.2, 5., No.3, No.3, 6, 8., 9, 10, No.2, 3, No.2, 3, 11, 12, 29.05.2013, 23.8.2013, 13, 14, 15, 7, 233, 16, 502, 502, 17, two, 31.5.2011, 11.5.2011, 2.6.2011, 17.06.2011, 6.7.2011, 23.7.2011, 28.11.2011, 18, one, 4.2.2012, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

ORG: the District Consumer, District Forum, Opposite Party, Oppsite Party, Opposite Party, the DLF Project, the DLF Company, Opposite Party, DVF, Panchkula, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, No.111104, HDFC Bank Ltd., Chandigarh to Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, the Honble Supreme Court, the Government of Haryana, The Honble Supreme Court, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, DBF, FF, Panchkula, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, 31.3.2011, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, OP-1/3, Opposite Party, OP-1/5, the Housing Project, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, the District Forum, Opposite Party, Consumer Courts, the Civil Court, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, the District Forum, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, the District Forum, Commission, No.1/Opposite Party, the District Forum, the Opposite Party, DLF Homes, the District Forum, the District Forum, No.1/Opposite Party, Lacs, the Opposite Party, DLF Homes, Panchkula Ltd., Consumer Complaint, District Forum-I, First Appeal, Commission, No.1/Opposite Party, Lacs, No.1/Opposite Party, No.1/Opposite Party, the District Forum, Lacs, 31.3.2011, Independent Floor No, DVF, No.1/Opposite Party, Fair Engg, C.C.I Chambers Coop, Housing Society Ltd., Credit Bank Ltd., No.1/Opposite Party, Independent Floor, DVF, District Forum, Plot, Plot, Total Price, Total PriceFoundation, Plinth Level, Total PriceCasting of, Ground Floor Roof Slab, Total PriceCasting, First Floor Roof Slab, Total PriceCasting, Second Floor Roof Slab, Total PriceCompletion of Flooring, Total PriceOn, Application for Completion Certificate, Total PriceOn, Lacs, 31.3.2011, No.1/Opposite Party, No.1/Opposite Party, OP-1/5, No.1/Opposite Party, Lacs, Application, Agreement, Application, Applicant, the Said Independent Floor, Independent Floor, the Earnest Money, the Non Refundable Amounts, Applicant, Company, the Said Independent Floor, the Said Independent Floor, Applicant, Applicant, the Earnest Money, the Non-Refundable Amounts, Company, The District Forum, No.1/Opposite Party, DBF, FF, Neeraj Rana, Lacs, No.1/Opposite Party, No.1/Opposite Party, No.1/Opposite Party, Independent Floor, District Forum, the Said Independent Floor, Company, Applicant, Applicant, Agreement, the Said Independent Floor, Applicant, Company, Application, the Earnest Money, the Non Refundable Amounts, Applicant, Applicant, the Said Project, Town and Country Planning, Company, Application, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, No.1/Opposite Party, The District Forum, DLF Universal Ltd., III, DLF, No.1/Opposite Party, the District Forum, the District Forum, the District Forum, Certified Copies

LOC: DLF Valley, Panchkula, Panchkula, Panchkula

WORK_OF_ART: Consumer Code No, Kamal Sood Vs

GPE: DLF Valley, DLF Valley, DLF Valley, Panchkula, DLF Valley, Panchkula, Annexures OP-1/4, DLF Valley

EVENT: No.21786-21788/2010 &, Phase II

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Rs.4,00,000/-, Lac, No.1, No.1, Para 13-A, Rs.93,44,090/-, Application

DATE: 1986, 17.6.2011, 14.5.2013 Sh, 2012, 2013, 2 months, four months, 2003, 2 Months, 4 months, 6 months, 9 months, 15 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months, two months, four months, two months, 30) days, 2.12.2011, 30) days, a period of, one year, 30 days, 2007

FAC: the District Forum, the Said Building/

PERCENT: 20%, 10%, 15%, later10%, later10%, later10%, later10%, 15%, 6%

QUANTITY: 1996)6 SCC 385

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //