Anant Prabhakar Malik Vs. Priority Automobiles (i) Pvt. Ltd. and Another - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Feb-28-2014

Court: Goa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Panaji

PERSON: N.A. Britto, Laura F/L, GA-04-C-4510, Innova, kerosene, Shri, Kirtani

CARDINAL: 1, 26/4/13, 2., 6/9/11, 2.0, 2, 6/9/13, 3., about 35844, 4., 27/10/12, 5., 2/11/12, 5/9/12, 6, 9/11/12, four, 14/11/12, 2,01,536.56, 23/11/12, about 26/11/10, 8, 10, 2.5.C, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

ORG: Rs.98,585/-, Panaji to Sawantwadi, Naibag, Taleigao, Rs.8000/-, Company, Toyota, the Marketing Discipline Guidelines, Commission, the National Commission, M/s. Hyundai Motors India Ltd., The National Commission

GPE: 7/9/12, Chandgad, Kolhapur, Pernem, helpline, 4/9/12

DATE: two year, 4/9/12, that day, the same day, the next day, 56 days, a period of, 15 days, 24/1/13., 14/11/12, 5/9/12, under two year, the months of October 2012 to April 2013, his day, 958/2007, 29/11/2007, 30 days, Rs.50,000/-, Rs.10,000/-

TIME: about 9.30 a.m.

PERCENT: 50%, 9%

ORDINAL: first