Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sunita Bali Vs. Kwality Colonisers Private Ltd. and Others

Decided On : Apr-29-2014

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

LAW: Section 17, the Consumer Protection Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Buyer`s Agreement, Section 2(d, the Companies Act, the Indian Penal Code

ORG: Sham Sunder, M.A. B.Ed, Coaching Institute, Second Floor, Opposite Party, No.000009, Opposite Party, Buyer`s Agreement, C-6, Annexure C-10, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Commission, Opposite Party, the Inspector General of Police, Police Station, Sector 17, Sections 420/467/468/471, Opposite Party, the Project of Opposite Party, Directorship of the said Company, Company, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Company, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Coaching Institute, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Lata Construction and Ors, CPC, AIR 1999, SC, Meerut Development Authority Vs, CPJ 12, SC, The Hon`ble Supreme Court, Second Floor, Opposite Party, M.A. B.Ed, Coaching Institute, Haryana Urban Development Authority Vs, CPJ 305, Panchkula, Rs.8,29,354.50, the District Forum, Disputes Redressal Commission, the Haryana Urban Development Authority, Revision Petition, The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pioneer Typewriter Co., CPJ 317, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the Opposite Party, the Paper Copier Machine, Disputes Redressal Commission, the Opposite Party, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bank, Jindal Oil, Ginning Factory Vs Punjab Small Industries and Export Corporation IV, Disputes Redressal Commission, Disputes Redressal Commission, Parliament, Laxmi Engineering Works Vs, P.S.G. Industrial Institute, CPJ 1 (, SC, Opposite Party, Commission, M/s Kwality Colonisers Pvt. Ltd., Opposite Party, Registered Office, the Proprietor of Opposite Party, the Registered Office of Opposite Parties, Buyer`s Agreement, Opposite Party, Jurisdiction of this Commission, Clause 45, Haryana High Court, Jurisdiction, Commission, the Counsel for Opposite Party, the Proprietor of Opposite Party, Annexure C-2, the Proprietor of Opposite Party, No.000009, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Police Station, Sector 17, Sections 420/467/468/471, Opposite Party, FIR, Opposite Party, P.A, P.A, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, the Counsel for Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Opposite Party, Certified Copies

PERSON: Retd, Radisson Hotel-cum-, Zirakpur, 04.11.2010, Annexure C-3, 04.11.2010, FIR No.70, Chandigarh, Harpreet Singh Mann, Harpreet Singh Mann, Career Consultancy, Hardeep Singh, Rameshchandra Ramniklal Shah, Anr, Kumar Gupta, Complaint, Radisson Hotel-cum-, Zirakpur, Usha Vohra, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Annexure C-3, 04.11.2010, Annexure C-3, Harpreet Singh, C-1, C-3, FIR No.70, Chandigarh, Foras, Record Room

CARDINAL: 1, 2, No.3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 11.09.2013, No.2, Rs.5, 3, 25.03.2014, 4, No.2, 3, No.2, No.2, No.2, 11.09.2013, 5, No.3, No.3, 2, No.3, 2, No.3, 2, No.3, 6., 3, 8, No.2, 9, No.3, 10, 3, 11, 2, 1, 269, 380, No.2, 12, 2, No.3, 31.12.1996, 294, 13, one, two, 2, No.3, 14, 22, No.3, 2, 2, 22, No.3, 2, No.2, 15, No.3, 2, 18.02.2014, 2, 2, 16, No.3, 2, 2, 17, No.2, 3, 2, 18, 2, 2, 30, 01.12.2012, 19, 20, No.2, 21., No.3, 2, 2, No.3, No.3, 22, 2, 01.12.2012, 2, No.3, 24, 25

DATE: 20 years, 04.10.2010, November, 2010, 2 years, November, 2011, November 2011, 1986, 22.08.2013, 120B, 30 days, November, 2010, November 2011, II 2000, 2012, the year 1992, the year 2009, 20 years, 2009, Sector 10, 15.10.1991, 1996, 2008, 1995, 1956, 2206, 2206, 10th November, 2011, November 2011, November, 2011, 10.11.2011., 10th November, 2010, 04.10.2010, two years, two years, 10th November 2011, 120B, two years, November 2012, two years, November 2011, the year 2010, the year 2012, two years, a period of, 45 days, 01.12.2012

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

PRODUCT: SF-33, Rs.11,00,000/-, Agreement, Rs.55,000/-, SF-33, a Full Bench, Rs.11,00,000/-, Rs.6,97,920/-, C-2, Rs.20,000/-, Rs.20,000/- 23

QUANTITY: 646.76 square feet, 646.76 square feet

GPE: No.000003, Rs.6,97,920/-, P.A., P.A., NC, Remington Rand, NC, New Delhi, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, No.000003, Rs.6,97,920/-, P.A., P.A., Rs.6,97,920/-, P.A., Rs.6,97,920/-, Rs.6,97,920/-, P.A., Clauses, Clause, P.A., P.A.

PERCENT: 90%, 10%, 90%, 11%, 10%

LOC: Pune

ORDINAL: first, first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, third, seventh, eighth, ninth

EVENT: The Buyer`s Agreement, the Buyer`s Agreement, the Buyer`s Agreement, the Buyer`s Agreement, the Buyer`s Agreement

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, Punjab

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //