Umesh Prakash and Another Vs. State Bank of India Hazratganj Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and Another - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-05-2012

Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

LAW: the Consumer Protection Act

PERSON: V.B. GUPTA, Lucknow, Annappa @ Appanna Vs, Anr, Katiji, Kumar, Ram Nath Sao @ Ram Nath Sahu, Gobardhan Sao, Lucknow, Lucknow, Lal, S.5, Ramlingam Vs, R.B. Bhavaneshwari, Scale 108?, Foras

CARDINAL: 5.8.2008, 2, 3., 4., 5., 372, 3, 4., 5., 8, 13.7.2011, 9, 8., 9, 10, 11, 12, 5.8.2008, 13, 14, 361, 15, 2, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 9.4.2012

ORG: Uttar Pradesh State, Disputes Redressal Commission, State Commission, the District Forum, the District Forum, District Forum, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, SC 274, Land Acquisition, AIR 1987, AIR 1998 SC 3222, AIR 2001, the Honble State Commission, Applicant, the State Commission, the Honble Commission, the Honble State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, U.P., œsufficient, Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962, Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Supreme Court, New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, Court, Court

DATE: 1,159 days, the end of June, 2011, 2000, 2002, 1997, 2006, few year, his day, around the month of December, 2010, March, 2011, the day to day, one month, one month, another 15 days, 15 days, the middle of May, 2011, the end of June, 2011, the year 2006, 2009, 1986, Rs.25,000/-, Rs.25,000/-, four weeks, today

PRODUCT: no.1

GPE: New Delhi, Lucknow, Lucknow, New Delhi, Delhi, p.a.

FAC: Farukhabad

PERCENT: 9%