Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Kikar Singh

Decided On : Mar-14-2012

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 4., four, two, 5, 6, Rs.95,921/-

PERSON: Uttari Haryana Bijli Vitran, Chandigarh, Kikar Singh, Petitioner, Fora, subsequent meter, Petitioner, Fora

ORG: Disputes Redressal Commission, Appeal, the District Forum, the District Forum, Respondent/Complainant, Petitioner/Nigam, Villa Navli, the Vigilance Team, Petitioner/Nigam, District Forum, the Petitioner/Nigam, Petitioner/Nigam, The District Forum, the Petitioner/Nigam, the State Commission, the District Forum, the District Forum, Learned Counsel for Petitioner, the Vigilance Team, Counsel for Petitioner, the Vigilance Team, the Competent Authority of the Petitioner, the Petitioner/Nigam, Respondents, Sale Circular No.4/91, the Indian Electricity Rules, Petitioners, Petitioners, the State Commission, the Counsel for Respondent, the Petitioner/Nigam, Respondents, the State Commission, The Revision Petition, The Petitioner/Nigam, Notice/Memo No.

PRODUCT: Atta Chakki, Respondent

DATE: 02.08.1998, Rs.95,921/-, 9 months, Rs.95,921/-, one month, seven days, 1910, 02.08.1990, a period of, six weeks, 14.09.1998

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: A M 7 A series

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //