Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shri S.C. Mathur and Others Vs. Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Others

Decided On : May-09-2012

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

LAW: Section 19, Section 19, section 17, Section 19, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2

ORG: Consumer Complaint No, The All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Prof. of Cardiology, AIIMS, OP-2, OP-2, AIIMS, Rs.149430/-, OP-2, PTCA, OP-2, PTCA, PCPS, PCPS, CPS, The State Commission, that:- œOP “AIIMS, the State Commission, the Appellants/Complainants, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, OP-2, AIIMS, the Respondents/Complainants, that:- œAny, the State Commission, the National Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, the appellant/ AIIMS, the National Commission, Commission, First Appeal, The State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Government Hospital, the State Commission, CTVS Surgeons, PCB, PCPS, CCU, the State Commission, PTCA, PCPS, PCPS, the expression &, the State Commission, AIIMS, the expression &, Amplatz, Amplatz, OP-2, PTCA, PCPS, PTCA, PCPS, Commission, CPB, the State Commission, the State Commission, PCPS, the State Commission, AIIMS, OP-2, Prof. of Cardiology, AIIMS, Government Hospital, AIIMS, the Apex Court, Indian Medical Association Vs, the Medical Council of India and/or State Medical Councils, the Indian Medical Council Act, a œcontract, Rs.149430/-, the State Commission, PTCA, the Apex Court, the All India Institute of Sciences, manner&rdquo, First Appeal, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, First Appeal, Disputes Redressal Commission, All India Institute of Medical Sciences and Respondent No.2, the State Commission

FAC: the Delhi State

PERSON: Disputes Redressal Commission, Asha Mathur, Asha Mathur, Upendra Kaul, Asha Mathur, Upendra Kaul, Asha Mathur, Complainant No.1, Kaul, Kaul, Complainant, Cath Lab, Cath Lab, Shipra Mathur, Complainant No.2, Mukul Gupta, Mrs, Bimla K. Kaul, Upendra Kaul, Shir S.K. Dubey, Dubey, Upendra Kaul, Cathetor, Kaul, Kaul, Kaul, Rajeev Aggarwal, Upendra Kaul, V.P. Shantha, Asha Mathur, Upendera Kaul

CARDINAL: 2, 2.2.1994, 23.3.1994, 3., Rs.75,000/-, 4., 22.3.1994, 5., Rs.2, 8., 9, three, thirty-five thousand, 10, 21.8.2008, 11, 12, 496, 23.3.1994, 13, three, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, No.2, No.2, 19, 20, 21, 6, 651, 1, 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, 6, 1, 9, 10, 11, 12, 1, 22, 23, two, 2008filed

TIME: about 4:30 p.m., six hours, about 8:45 a.m., 5:30 p.m., 5:45 p.m. 6, four minutes, 30 minutes, four minutes, 30 minutes, 30 minutes, almost 30 minutes, four minutes, 30 minutes, 30 minutes, these 30 minutes, 30 minutes, 30 minutes

PRODUCT: Rs.60,000/-

NORP: Complainants

GPE: Sri S.C.Mathur, CC

DATE: February, 565 days, a period of, thirty days, thirty days, 8.8.2006, 2006, September, 2006, the end of March, 2008, nearly two months, 1986, only 30 days, 30 days, 2006, 1995, 1986, a period of, 30 days, 1995, a period of, three months

ORDINAL: fourth, first, first

MONEY: fifty per cent

PERCENT: 9%, 10%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //