Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

MerlIn Projects Ltd. and Another Vs. Pandav Roy and Another

Decided On : May-23-2014

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

LAW: Section 19, the Consumer Protection Act, the Companies Act, Article I of Agreement, the SARFAESI Act, Article II, a Tripartite Agreement, the SARFAESI Act, the SARFAESI Act

ORG: D.K. Jain, the State Consumer, Disputes Redressal Commission, œthe State Commission, the State Commission, Appellants, the Complaint as Opposite Parties No, The State Commission, the Respondents/Complainants, Appellants, an Agreement of Allotment, Respondents, Respondents, Union Bank of India, the Appellant Company, Bank, Respondents, the Appellant Company, the Appellant Company, Respondents, Bank, the Appellant Company, Respondents, the Appellant Company, the Corpus Fund, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Life Time Maintenance Charges &, Corpus Fund, Bank, Bank, the Appellant Company, Conveyance Deed, Respondents, the State Commission, Appellants, Appellants, Complaint, Bank, Respondents, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, Respondents, Complaint, Complaint, Complaint, Bank, Respondents, Respondents, Bank, Respondents, the State Commission, Respondents, Bank, Appellants, Respondents, the State Commission, Agreement of Allotment, Bank, Respondents, Conveyance Deed, the State Commission, Respondents, Respondents, the State Commission, Appellants, Respondents, Conveyance Deed, Respondents, Appellant, Bank, Bank, Appellants, Respondents, Bank, Respondents, Bank, the State Commission, Bank, Respondents, Bank, the Agreement of Allotment, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Bank, Bank, Respondents, the Appellant Company, Bank, Builder, Bank, Borrower, the Row House, Bank, Bank, Respondents, No Objection Certificate, Bank, Bank, Agreement of Allotment, Bank, the Appellant Company, Housing, S/Shri, Row House, Kriparampur 24 Parganas, S/Sri Pandav, Bank, Borrower, the Appellants/Builder, Bank, Respondents, Respondents, Bank, Appellants, Rs.1,93,750/- &, Merlin Projects Ltd., the Appellant Company, Conveyance Deed, Respondents, Respondents, Bank, Respondents, the State Commission, Respondents, Appellants, Complaint, Bank, Respondents, Bank, Bank, Appellants, Bank, Bank, Respondents, Bank, Respondents, EMI, Bank, Bank, Bank, Appellants, Respondents, Bank, Respondents, Appellants, Appellants, the State Commission, Bank, The Special Leave Petition, Appellants, the State Commission, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Complaint, Bank, Bank, Respondents, the State Commission, Complaint, Respondents, Appellants, the State Commission, Appellants, Conveyance Deed, the State Commission, Housing Price Index, the National Housing Board, Respondents, Appellants, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Appellants, Commission, Reserve Bank of India, CS, Merlin Projects Ltd., Nilmani Dutta

DATE: 1986, 1956, 24.02.2009, 07/0/2007, 01.05.2003, Rs.50,000/-, 01.05.2003, the same day, 01.05.2003, 23.10.2006, 22.09.2003, 01.05.2003, the same day, 23.10.2006, 01.03.2007, 2002, 30.05.2003, 01.05.2003, 01.05.2003, 60 days, Rs.50,000/-, 01.05.2003, May 01, 2003, 01.05.2003, 14, 25.02.2004, 25.02.2004, 20.04.2004, 25.02.2004, two and a half years, 2006, the year 2003, 21.01.2004, three months later, 15.09.2006, two and a half years, 23.10.2006, 2011, 01.05.2003, 28.07.2007, 21, the year 2007, Rs.16,25,000/- in the year 2003, the year 2007, 2009, February 2009, sixty days, Rs.50,000/-, 30 days, 2013 24

PERSON: Colonizer, Merlin Gardens, Kolkata, Appellants, Conveyance Deed, Schedule, Deed, Nakul Dewan, Prasanta Banerjee, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Conveyance Deed, Roy, Partha Roy, Roy, Partha Roy, Shiv Kishan Mohata, Appellants, Rs.1,93,750/-, Appellants, Conveyance Deed, Appellants, Appellants, Sri Pandav, Roy, Anr, Anr, Anr

GPE: West Bengal, Parganas, Rs.1,18,750/-, Rs.13,84,250/-, p.a., Ld, Ld, p.a., thereon, I.A.

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2., 21.01.2004, 25.02.2004, 3., 20.04.2004, 2, 4., 5., 6., 21.01.2004, 20.05.2003, Rs.75,000/-, 21.01.2004, 6, 2.1, 8, three, 21.01.2004, 9, 2, 21.01.2004, 21.01.2004, 18, 10, 12, 21.01.2004, 22.01.2004, 13, 3, 25.02.2004, 15, 21.01.2004, 20.04.2004, 16, 17, 3, 20.04.2004, 18, 29.05.2012, 19, 20, 1, 100, 162, 22, 23, Rs.35,000/-, 18936/07, 271/10

WORK_OF_ART: the Deed of Conveyance, Tripartite Agreement, Tripartite Agreement, Deed of Conveyance, the Conveyance Deed, the Deed of Conveyance, Conveyance Deed, the Conveyance Deed, Conveyance Deed, Tripartite Agreement, The Terrace Marlin Green, Tripartite Agreement, the Conveyance Deed, Tripartite Agreement, Conveyance Deed

PRODUCT: Appellant No.1, Complaint under Section 17, Borrowers, Appellant

EVENT: the Supplementary Agreement, the Tripartite Agreement, Borrowers, the Tripartite Agreement

NORP: Affidavits

PERCENT: 9%, 9%

ORDINAL: third, first, first

FAC: Borrowers, Borrowers

LOC: Builder, Builder, Merlin Gardens

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //