Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ultratech Cement Limited and Another Vs. Shree Balaji Cement Industries and Others

Decided On : Jan-18-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 134, Section 134, Section 134, Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20, Section 134 of the Act, Section 20, Section 134, Section 134, Section 134, the Indian Penal Code, Article 183, Article 183 of the old, the Banking Companies Act, the Division Bench, Article 183 of the Old Limitation Act, Section 134 of the Act, Section 20, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 20, Section 62, the Copyright Act, Section 62, the Copyright Act and Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, Section 20, Section 120 of the C.P.C, Section 20, Section 20 of the, Section 134(2, the Copyright Act, Section 124, Section 124, Section 124 of the Act, Section 30, Section 124, Section 124 of the Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3., 4., 5., at least one, 31, 103, 3, 11, 6, 2, 2, 2, 94, 39, 118, 151, 8, 6, 9, 14, 10, 4, 11, 6, 7, 8, 4, 50, 604, 12, 13, 2, 2, 14, 2, 15, one, one, one, at least one, 8, 7, 8, 7, 16, at least one, 17, 37, 269, 14, 5, 18, 50, 124, 11, 604, 9, 3, 29, 2, 30, 2, 2, 5, 8., 9, 19, 16, 20, 21

ORG: The Petitioners (œPlaintiffs?, Suit, UltraTech, Petitioners, the Respondents as œthe Defendants, Court, Court, Registered Office, Corporate Office, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Learned Advocate, Court, Letters Patent, Court, Court, Court, M/s. Arte Indiana, Court, Court, œcause, arise œwithin jurisdiction?, Defendants, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Union of India, AIR 2003 SC, Court, Himachal Pradesh, Defendants, UnichemLaboratories Pvt. Ltd., Cadilla Healthcare Pvt, Pfizer Enterprises Sarl, Cipla Ltd., ILR, the Trade Marks Act, District Court, Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, Court, CPC, CPC, Court, Haryana and/or Himachal Pradesh, Haryana and/or Himachal Pradesh, Suit, CPC, Defendants, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, M/s. Prasad Trading Company, SargujaTransport Service, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, AIR 1987 SC 88, Indian Performing Rights Society, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, SLP, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, KusumIngots and Alloys Ltd., Union of India, High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Hindustan Unilever Ltd., Ashique Chemicals, the Delhi High Court, Defendants, Hindustan Unilever, Defendants, Court, CPC, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Patel Roadways, Sarguja Transport Service, Hindustan Unilever, Court, Hindustan Unilever's, The Learned Advocate, Defendants, Court, Exhibit-H, Defendants, Exhibit-H, Defendants, Court, Court, M/s. Arte Indiana, Court, Court, Lime, Chilli Hospitality Services P. Ltd., The Learned Senior Advocate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, Court, Defendants, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, Defendants, Court, M/s. Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd., M/s. Shree Siyaram Fab Pvt. Ltd., Court, Apricot Foods Pvt. Ltd., Defendants, CPC, Court, The Learned Advocate, Defendants, Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Himachal Pradesh, Court, Defendants, Court, District Court, Registered Office, Corporate Office, Court, Court, Suit, Court, Suit, Clause XIV are &oelig, the High Court, the High Court, œcause, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, AIR 1987, SC, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, State, Ors, The Apex Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Legislature, Court, the High Court, Court, Suit, Court, Court, Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Munia Servai v. Hanuman Bank, Bank, Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, Decree, Court, Royal Charter, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Court, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, Court, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, Court, Legislature, Defendants, Letters Patent, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, Coram, C.J., Wipro Limited, Oushadha Chandrika Ayurvedic, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Ex Phar SA, Eupharma Laboratories Ltd., AIR 2004 SC, Court, institute a Suit, œnotwithstanding, C.P.C, High Court, C.P.C, the Trade Marks Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, M/s. Siyaram Silk Mills Ltd., M/s. Shree Siyaram Fab Pvt. Ltd., Plaintiff, Court, Court, Court, Apricot Foods Pvt. Ltd., Suit, the mark œEVEREST, Suit, Sections 28, Suit, Plaintiff, Defendants, Defendants, Plaintiff, Defendants, Court, Register, Plaintiff, Registrar, the Appellate Board, Court, Defendants, Defendants, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Defendants, Suit, Suit, Court, Court, XIV, Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Plaintiffs under Clause XIV

PRODUCT: Plaint, BLR Vol

PERSON: Clause XIV, Tukoji Rao Holkar, Pandharinath Rajapurkar, Mittulal Lalah, Arte Indiana, Chajju Ram, Haryana, Clause XIV, Clause XIV, Sanjay Dalia, DB)which, Kusum Ingots, Plaint, JagdishGopal Kamath, L.J. 627)has, S. Narendraumar and, Clause XIV, Clause XIV, Clause XIV, Mathai Verghese, Paragraphs 6, Mathai Verghese, Suits, Clause XIV, Clause XIV, A.P. Shah, F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, Paragraphs 10 and 11, S. Narendraumar and, Paragraphs 7, Defendant, JagdishGopal Kamath and Ors, Clause XIV

GPE: Sowkabai, the Learned Single, Arte, Indiana, Suit No., Haryana, Bombay, Kerala, Arte, Indiana, Kerala, India, Counsel, India, C.P.C, Suit No., Mumbai, Mumbai

DATE: 1928, 1999, 2009, 1999, 1908, 1992, 2009, 27th January, 2009, 980981, 2009, 1064310644, 2010, 2005, 2011, 12th December, 2013, 2013, 2012, 13th January, 2012, 1319, 2012, 2010, 29th May, 2013, 14., 1947, August 1957, 1953, 12 years, 1953, 1949, 2008, 1682, 1908, 2012, 13th January, 2012, 1319, 2012, 2010, 29th May, 2013, 8, Section 124, 16

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Indian, Indian

LOC: Learned Single, Liquidator, Plaintiff

WORK_OF_ART: Ultra Tuck', ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

EVENT: Limitation Act, Limitation Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //