Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Antonio Menezes Vs. Vithola Shamba Shetye and Others

Decided On : Jan-24-2014

Court : Mumbai Goa

LAW: Rule 10(2, The Income Tax Act, Chapter, section 35, section 34, Order 7, Rule 11, Section 35, Section 34

PERSON: Sardessai, Tari, Bicholim, Murdi Kator', Piligaon, Survey Nos, Francisco Pascoal Jose de Menezes, Veronica Gonsalves Menezes, Pandhari Mulgaonkar, Daman, Shamba Anant Shetye, Parrikar, Mamlatdar, Goa, 21/01/2013, Anant Shamba Shetye, Vasant Shetye, Vasant Shetye, Sardessai, Shri Shamba Anant Shetye, Pandhari Mulgaonkar, Shri Shamba Anant Shetye, Sardessai, Joint Mamlatdar, Mamlatdar, Tari, Shrikant, Shamba Anant Shetye, Parrikar, Vasant Shetye, Shamba Shetye, Shri Shamba Anant Shetye, Shamba Anant Shetye, Vasant Shetye, Pobres Xavier, Pandhari Mulgaonkar, Veronica Gonsalves Menezes, Vasant Shetye, Shamba Anant Shetye, Parrikar, Shri Shamba Anant Shetye, Vasant Shetye, Vasant Shetye, Vasant Shetye, Shri Shamba Anant Shetye, Vasant Shamba Shetye, Vasant Shamba Shetye, Shamba Anant Shetye, Order, Order I Rule, Merali, Meralis, Sundaram, Merali, Sundaram, Mamlatdar, 21/01/2013, Mamlatdar, Vasant Shetye, Shamba Shetye, Mamlatdar

CARDINAL: 3, 5, 2., 3., 3, 5, 12, 1, 5., 6, 216/1 and 2, one, 1, 3, 4, one, 8, 9, 3, 5, 3 to 5, 10., 3 to 5, 11, no.1a, 1(d, 2, 8(a, 8(d, 9, 12, 5, 12, 3 to 5, 13, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 5, 14, 5, 1, one, 3 to 5, 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 14, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 15, 2, 1, 9, 168, 6, 16, 3, 5, 3 to 5, one, one, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, no. 3 to 5, 17, 18, 10(2, two, one, 19, 3 to 5, 3, 3 to 5, one, 20, 2, 3 to 5, 3, 5, one, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 21, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 22, 3 to 5, no. 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 23, 24, 10, Two, 1, 2, 25, 34 and 35, 34, 35, 26, 10, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 27, 3 to 5, 28, 29, 3 to 5, 3 to 5, 30

DATE: 4, 28/06/2013, 4, 6, 04/02/1974, 13/12/2012, 4, 3, 4, 28/06/2013, the year 1924, the year 1998, the year 1924, the year 1979, September, 2007, 24/09/2007, 13/12/2012, 1992, 2000, 2000, 2005, the year 1998, 13/12/2012, the same day i.e., 13/12/2012, the year 1924, the year 1924, 4, the year 1965, 1965, the year 1976, 1947, 1961, 1992, the year 1979, 24/9/2007, more than 5 years, 13/12/2007, 28/06/2013

PRODUCT: Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, Vs, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1

ORG: Civil Judge, Said Regular Civil Suit No, no.8, Deed of Exchange, no.1, Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, Court, Civil Miscellaneous Application, Regular Civil Suit, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Trial Court, The Trial Court, The Trial Court, Trial Court, The Trial Court, Court, Trial Court, the Trial Court, Kerala Vs, KasturiVs, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Order I of C. P.C., Court, Court, Court, Court, inter alia, Trial Court, the Trial Court, Shri Francisco Pascoal Jose da Menezes, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, CPC, CPC, Shipping Services Private Limited, the Apex Court, Indian Company, the New Orleans Court, SNP, the Indian Authorities, SNP, SNP, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, the Securities and Exchange Board, SNP, Court, Court, the Indian Authorities, SNP, Indian Company, WTCC, Court, the New Orleans Court, Court, Court, Court, Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd., Regular Civil Suit

PERCENT: 15 %, 5 %

NORP: Bicholim, Indians

ORDINAL: 5th

GPE: Bicholim, Bicholim, Bicholim, C.R., Vithoba, Counsel, Counsel, C.P.C.

WORK_OF_ART: Tenancy Case No, Deed of Transfer and Relinquishment, Order I Rule 10(2

LOC: Mamlatdar, Mamlatdar, Mamlatdar

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //