M/S. Bombay Intelligence Security (i) Ltd. Vs. Harinarayan Jeet Bahadur Singh and Others

Decided On : Feb-21-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 28, Section 2(s, Section 44, section 2(s, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(s, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(s, Section 28, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, Maharashtra Act, the Industrial disputes Act, Section 2(s, the Factories Act, Section 2(s, Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(s, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 2(o, Section 25-F, Article 226 of Constitution

CARDINAL: 1, 1(b, 1.3.2005, 2, thousands, about 250, four, 7, two, three, one, three, one, three, three, one, two, one, 1.3.2005, 3.3.2005, 5.4.2005, 5.3.2005, three, 3., 1(a, 1.3.2005, 4., four, four, 22.4.2005, 25.4.2005, 23.4.2005, 5., 6, 1(b, 1.3.2005, 8., 9, 22.4.2005, 166)as, 1, 166, 10, 28.2.2005, 1(a, 560, II, 1, 1964(3, 560, 1970)(AIR, 922, 922, 650, 11, 226, 12, six thousand, 13, three, three, 8, four, 14, two, 15, 248, 3, 6, 6, 3, 157, one, 16, One, two, 8, 17, 5.3.2005, 22.4.2005, 23.4.2005, 18, 19

ORG: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 8th Labour Court, Complaint, ULP, Industrial Court, Revision Application, ULP, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, Judgment, MRTU, Complaint, ULP, the Labour Court, Sangli, Nityanand Nagar, no.1, the Ghatkopar Office, no.1, Rs.1500/-, Surya Nagar Police Station, N.C. Complaint no.358, Awa Garment, Labour and Industries, Government, no.1, Rs.8000/-, Security Guard Board, Awa Garment, the Labour Court, ESIC, ESIC Card, Labour and Industries, the Labour Court, the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices, the Labour Court, MRTU, PULP, the Labour Court, Complaint, ULP, the Labour Court, the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, MRTU, PULP Act, Suraksha Rakshak Mandal, the Labour Court, the Petitioner-Company, Awa Garment, Labour and Industries, the Labour Court, the Petitioner Shri, Labour, Complaint, MRTU, PULP, the Industrial Court, the Industrial Court, Court, the Labour Court, Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, the Labour Court, Security Guard, Respondent no.1, Labour and Industries, Counsel for Petitioner, Court, Maharashtra Scooters Ltd, the Labour Court, the Division Bench, the Labour Court, Jayhind Vithoba Mahadik, Counsel, the Labour Court, MRTU, Court, Western India Match co.Ltd., Workmen(1964(3, Distributing Co., India Ltd., The Burmah Shell Management Staff Association, The Burmah Shell Management Staff Association, Burmah Shell Oil Storage, Distributing Co., India Ltd., Supreme Court, AIR 1971, Supreme Court, Karnataka Bank Ltd. Vs, the Labour Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Respondent no.1's, Court, the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, the Industrial Disputes Act,1947, under:- œ2, Definitions &, s) œworkman, the Air Force Act,1950, Navy, the Air Force Act,1950, Navy, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, under:- œIt, Security Guard, Complaint, the Labour Court, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Provident Fund Section, The Labour Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Judgment, Court, Management of M/s.May, the Labour Court, The Labour Court, Distributing Co., India Ltd., the Supreme Court, J. and F. Stone Lighting, Radio Ltd. Vs, AC Pt, Tribunal, the Division Bench, Court, œKarnataka Bank Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Court, Maharashtra Scooters Ltd., the Labour Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, the Labour Court, the Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Labour and Industries, the Labour Court, MRTU, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, Industrial Disputes Act,1947, the Labour Court, the Labour Court, The Industrial Court, the Labour Court, Court

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, N.C., Mumbai, Mumbai, LPA, Supervisor, Supervisor, C.A.No.1477, C.A.No.1477, Workmen, N.C.

DATE: 2005, 10.4.2007, no.33 of 2006, 1971, 2005, October, 1998, 28.2.2005, the same day, every month, 2005, 28.2.2005, the next date, 1.3.2005, around 3rd week, 5.4.2005, 28.2.2005, three months, year 2002-2003, 28.2.2005, 28.2.2005, Rs.17,684/-, 28.2.2005, 28.2.2005, 28.2.2005, 2004, the year 1998, 1971, 1970, 1970, 1970, 1971, 45 of 1950, 46 of 1950, 62 of 1957, 2006, month, month, the month of October,1998, 2003, the year 2003, 1968, 16, the day, 28.2.2005, 2005

PERSON: Schedule IV, Ghatkopar, Ram Agya Singh, Nanhe Singh, Jai Singh, R.A.Singh, no.1, Amarjeet Singh, Ghatkopar, Ghatkopar, Ganesh Rumani, Awa Garments, Ghatkopar, Amarjeet Singh, Ghatkopar, Amarjeet Singh, Jaiswal, Amarjeet Singh, Ghatkopar, R.L.Mishra, Ghatkopar, Amarjeet Singh, Petitioner, Amerjeet Singh, Schedule IV, Schedule IV, Respondent no.1, Petitioner, Schedule IV, Schedule IV Of, Kiran Bapat, Aarshad Shaikh, Respondent no.1, JayhindVithoba Mahadik Vs, Shaikh, Respondent no.1, Respondent no.1, Schedule IV, S.C.R., Sunita B.Vatsaraj, mark attendance, Supervisor, Baker, V. Their, Gupta, ¦ ¦, ¦, ¦, ¦, Gupta, Sunita B.Vatsaraj, JayhindVithoba Mahadik's

FAC: the Awa Garment

TIME: 11 a.m., 12 hours, hours, 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., around noon, 4 p.m. Mr.R.A.singh, about 8.30 p.m., 7 a.m., 1.30 p.m., 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., 12 hours, 12 hours

PRODUCT: no.1, Respondent no.1, Respondent no.1, Respondent no.1, Respondent no.1, Respondent no.1, Respondent, Judgment, Respondent no.1, Respondent no.1

ORDINAL: second, first, firstly, Secondly, Firstly, secondly

LOC: Workmen, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge

NORP: Security, South Indian

EVENT: œAnandaBazar Patrika