Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Madhu Ashok Kapur and Others Vs. Rana Kapoor and Others

Decided On : Mar-24-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 9, Plaintiff No.1, the Companies Act, the Banking Regulation Act, section 10 A (, the Companies Act, the Banking Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 35, the Banking Act, the Banking Act and, the Companies Act, Article 110, Article 110, Section 616, the Companies Act, the Banking Act, Section 10 A of the Banking Act, Section 10 A, the Companies Act, Section 10 A, Section 10, the Companies Act, the Banking Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 9, the Banking Act, the Companies Act, Section 10 A, Section 10 A., Section 10 A, the Companies Act, Section 10 A of the Banking Act, section 3, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Banking Act, Section 10A, the Banking Act, Section 10A, Section 10A, the Banking Act, Section 10A, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 284 of the Companies Act, the Banking Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 10A, the Banking Act, Section 10, Section 10, the Companies Act, the Banking Act, Section 10A, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 10, the Banking Act, Section 10A, Section 255, the Companies Act, Section 255, Section 10A., the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 10A, the Banking Act, Section 10A, Section 256, the Companies Act, Section 256, the Banking Regulation Act, section 10 A of the Act, section 10 A of the Act, section 256, the Companies Act, section 256, Section 10 A of the Act, section 10A, section 10A, the Companies Act, section 256 of the Companies Act, section 10A, section 35, section 256 of the Companies Act, Section 10A, Section 10A, Section 10A, Section 10A, the Companies Act, Section 10A, the Companies Act, Section 257, the Companies Act, Section 10A, the Banking Act, Section 10A, Article 127A of Defendant No. 6, Section 10A, the Banking Act, Section 35, Article 110, the Notice of Motion, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 9, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 10 of the Companies Act, Section 10, section 2, the Companies Act, Section 10, Section 10, the Companies Act, Section 2, Section 10, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, section 2, the Companies Act, section 10, the Companies Act, Section 10, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, section 10, section 10, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Rule 9, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, The Notice of Motion

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3., 4, 3, one, 5, 3, 5, 12, 6, 6, two, three, three, 8, 3, 6, two, 9, 1, two, 6, 7 to 9, 6, 8, 9, 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 6, 7 to 9, 7 to 9, 6, 10 to 12, 7 to 12, 6, 11, 7 to 12, 6, 7 to 12, 12, 6, 193, 194, 6, 7 to 9, 10 to 12, 6, 1, 13, 7 to 12, 6, 2, 6, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 to 12, 7 to 9, 10 to 12, 1, 14, 6, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 15, 1, 2, less than fifty-one, one, less than two, 1, 25, 2, 2A, 3, 2, 4, 3, 5, 2, 2, 6, 8), 16, 2, less than fifty, one, 2A, 3, 2, 4, 5, 2, 6, 17, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 18, 252, 266, 256, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 6, 5, 6, 19, two, less than two thirds, less than two thirds, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, two-thirds, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 20, 80, 814, 3, less than two-thirds, less than two, 2, 3, 2, two, 2, 4, 6, 3, 4, 5, only one, 3, 2, five, 3, ten, seven, 2, six, one, 2, ten, six, one, six, 3, 6, 3, 22, 2, 6, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 6, 23, 3, 4, 9, 3, 4, 2, 6, three, 3, 4, 2, 10 to 12, 1, 6, 3, 4, 7 to 12, 3, 4, 6, 24, 3, 4, 6, 7 to 12, 3, 4, 6, 25, 1, 264, 2, 13, 3, 310, 121, 374, 36, 483, 11, 73, 48, 341, 123, 566, 254, 60, 353, 361, 42, 48, 26, 78, 27, 50, 11, 107, 155, 163, 2, 237, 397, 425, 11, 10, 107, 155, 397, 11, 10, 28, 29, 11, 11, 30, 752, two, 397, 398, 408, 2, 461, 397, 398, 408, 31, 33, 3, 6, 7, at least two, 34, 7 to 12, 36

ORG: Plaintiff, the Articles of Association of the, Court, Court, Court, Court, Indian Partners, the Articles of Association of Defendant No.6, Netharlands, the Articles of Association as &, Ashok Kapur, Defendant No.6 &, Bank &, Rabobank, Rabobank, The Share Subscription Agreement and the Articles of Association of Defendant Nos.6, Indian Partners, the Board of Defendant, Representative Directors, Independent Directors, the Representative Directors, Board, Ashok Kapur, Ashok Kapur, Indian Partners, Plaintiffs, the Board of Directors of Defendant No, Suit, Indian Partners, AGM, Court, AGM, AGM, Court, AGM, the Board of Directors of Defendant No, Time Directors, Suit, the Board of, the Articles of Association of Defendant No, 9th AGM, AGM, the HR Committee, the Nomination and Governance Committee, the Board Meeting, Counsel, Counsel, the Supreme Court, Court, Counsel, Reserve Bank of India, the Articles of Association, Reserve Bank Circulars, the Articles of Defendant No, Board of, Board, Board, sub-Sections, Board, Reserve Bank, the word œjurisdiction, Advocate General, Defendants, A. Board, the Board of directors, namely;- (, Reserve, Board, Board, Board, Board, the Reserve Bank, Board of, the Reserve Bank, Bank, the Board of directors, the Board of, Court, the Board of Directors, the Board of, the Board of the, the Board of, Board, Board, Board, Board, the Reserve Bank, Board, the Reserve Bank, the Board of Directors, Counsel for the Defendants, Board, the Board of Directors, Board of Directors, Sections 255, the Board of Directors, Board, Board, The Board, Board, the Reserve Bank, Board, the Reserve Bank, Board, Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., the Reserve Bank, Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank, Court, Company, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank of India, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank of India, the Reserve Bank, Counsel for the Defendants, Board, Board, Board, non &ldquo, Board, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank, Counsel for the Defendants, Group, AGM, AGM, the Board of Directors, the HR Committee, Governance Committee, the Board of Directors of Defendant No., Suit, Sub-Sections, the Reserve Bank, Indian Partners, Court, Counsel for the Defendants, Counsel, Khetan Industries Vs, AIR, Bombay Page 43, Patel Engineering, AIR, G.S. Bali Vs Babulal Jain, Counsel for the Plaintiffs, Santosh Poddar Vs, Chandra Agarwal, AIR 2003 SCC Page 2696, CDS Financial Services, BPL Communication Pvt. Ltd., P) Ltd., Comp Cases Supreme Court, AIR, Kerala Page, Maharaja Exports Vs, Apparels Exports Promotion Council, Berar Trading Co. Ltd., AIR 1924, Dwarka Prasad Aggarwal's, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1969, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Paripalana Vogam, Court, Court, Sections, Court, œthe Court, Sections 2, the Company Court, the civil Court, Sections 2, The Supreme Court, Dwarka Prasad Agarwal's, Delhi High Court, Directors, Santosh Poddar, Santosh Poddar's, the Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Company Law Board, the Central Government, Court, Court, Court, the Company Court, Civil Courts, Civil Courts, the City Civil Court, Court, CDS Financial Services, the Supreme Court, Union of India, AIR 1988 SC Page, the Supreme Court, High Courts, the High Courts, Kerala High Courts, Company, Court, Khetan Industries, Counsel for the Defendants, Company, Supreme, Division Benches, Court, Khetan Industries', Khetan Industries', Foss Vs, Harbottle, Patel Engineering Co. Ltd., the Company Court, Court, Company Court, the Civil Court, the Articles of Association, Rajasthan High Court, G.S. Bali, Court, Court, Court

PERSON: Ashok Kapur, Nos.4, Ashok Kapur, Ashok Kapur, Articles, Articles, Ashok Kapur, Ashok Kapur, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Rana Kapoor, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Kadam, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Cooper, Kadam, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Kadam, Articles, Articles, Articles, Articles, T. S. Arumugham Vs, Articles, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Defendant Nos, Articles, Manju Ravindraprasad, LIC Vs, Kishore Y. Patil Vs, Rajasthan Page, Kamalkumar Poddar, C.R. Page, V.N. Bhajekar Vs, K.M. Shinkar, ClaudeLila Parulekar Vs SaKal Papers, Satyavart Sidhantalankar Vs, The Arya Samaj, Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad Vs, Shantadevi P. Gaekwad, N. Govindan, Delhi Page, Gopalrao Dixit, Chandra Chakravarti Vs, T. Chandra Chatterjee, R. Prakasam Vs, Prakasam, Directors, Kumar Bhargava Vs, Andhra Pradesh, Madras, Haryana, Foss V. Harbottle, Directors, Directors, Defendant Nos

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Punjab

PERCENT: 49 %, at least 10%, about 12%, 25 %, 51 %, 51 %, 51%, the 51%, 51%

GPE: Mumbai, Counsel, Articles, Dhulabhai, Kerala, Delhi

DATE: 26th November, 2008, that day, about 2011, May 2013, Annual, 8th June 2013, 7th June 2013, 8th June 2013, a few days, 27th June 2013, 1956, 1949, 1968, 58 of 1968, three months, 1956, 1 of 1956, 1956, 1 of 1956, eight years, four years, two months, eight years, four years, annual, 1994, annual, annual, 21, five., 8, 17 April 2013, 1995, 1986, 1992, 2000, 1992, 2004, 1934, 2005, 1945, 2005, 1959, 1986, 1972, 1843, 32, 1843 2, 35

PRODUCT: Articles, Articles, Boards, Articles, Articles, Calcutta Page 982, Calcutta, Calcutta, Articles

ORDINAL: 9th, Secondly, first, first, second, first, first, seventh, sixth, first, first, Ninth, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, first, third

WORK_OF_ART: the Articles of Defendant No, Articles of the Company, Comp Cases Page 611

TIME: 6, minutes, minutes, minutes, the minutes, These minutes, under this Act

FAC: Bombay Page 114, Maharaja Exports, Registrar

LOC: Single, Single

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //