Rekha Agarwal and Another Vs. Anil Agarwal and Others

Decided On : Apr-03-2014

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 11, Section 16, Section 11, Section 11, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 8 or Section 11, Section 8, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(6, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 16, Section 11, a Constitutional Bench, Section 11, Section 8, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, the Partnership Act, Section 8, Section 8, the Arbitration Act 1996, Section 8(2, section 8, Section 16

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3., 4., 5, 6, 258, 8., three, 1, 1, 9, 10, 1, 11, 18, 12, two, One, 13, 8, 618, two, 14, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, 15, three, 17.1, 17.2, 17.3, 16, 1, 2, 3, two, 2, 3, 6, 1, one, 17, 17, 18, 13, 19, 20, two, 21, two, 22, 23, 24, 1, 2, 9, one, 25, 3, 26, 21, 23, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, one, 30, 2507)The, three, 16, 31, three, six, 48(2, six, 33, two, one, 1999(5, 651, 35, 9, 34, 35, two

ORG: The Appellants/Petitioners, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Respondents, Arbitration Petition No.257 of, M/s Laxmi Centre, Respondents, Statement of Defence, the Arbitrator., Arbitrator, Counsel for Respondent, the Supreme Court, Court, Arbitration Petitions, Court, Court, Respondents, Court, Court, Counsel, Arbitrator, ITC Limited, ITC Limited, ITC Limited, ITC Limited, Court, Court, Court, Court, Sections 11, the Supreme Court, SBP, Patel Engineering Ltd, Sections, the Supreme Court, Sections 11, the Supreme Court, SBP and Co., the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice, the Supreme Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Boghara Polyfab Pvt. Ltd., AIR 2009 Supreme Court, 170.)The Supreme Court, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Co., the Supreme Court, Act, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, National Insurance Co.'s, the Supreme Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, ASP Kushwaha, the Supreme Court, Co., Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, National Insurance Co., National Insurance Co., Arbitrator, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Maestro Engineers And Others, Respondents, Court, the Supreme Court, The High Court, the Supreme Court, Maestro Engineers, Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, English Courts, Civil Court, Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Madras High Court, the Supreme Court, Maestro Engineers, the Supreme Court, œin, the High Court, Court, HSBC PI Holdings, Avitel Post Studioz Limited, Coram, R.D. Dhanuka, Maestro Engineers, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Supreme, the Madras High Court, CTS 269, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Ivory Properties, Hotels Pvt, Neville Wadia, Arbitration Application No.123 of, Coram, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, National Insurance, the Supreme Court, Hamilton Inc., SBI Home Finance Ltd., Ors.(AIR 2011 Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the State (Courts, Hamilton Inc., the Supreme Court, Legislature, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Olympus Superstructures Pvt, AIR 1999, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 2013, 25 June 1976, September 1985, 4 March 1997, 29 July 2010, 1976, 2013, 2013, 1 June 2000, 1 June 2000, 1 June 2000, 1 June 2000, section-11, 4th March, 1997, 2005, 16, 2011, 2010, 72, 2001, a century, 1996, 1932, 2012, 6 December 2013, 2001, 2008, 7 January 2011, 32, 1999, 1846, 36

WORK_OF_ART: Deed of Partnership, the Statements of Claim and Defence

PERSON: Snehal Shah, Counter, Counterclaim, Claimant, Counter, Counter, Counterclaim, Dhond, Andhyarujina, Merchant, Raipur, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner, Designate, K.K. Venugopal, Designate, Patel Engg. Ltd., N. Radhakrishnan Vs, H.G. Oomor Sait, O. Aslam Sait, Counsel, H.G. Oomor Sait, N. Radhakrishnan, H.G. Oomor Sait, O. Aslam Sait, N. Radhakrishnan, N. Radhakrishnan, D.Y. Chandrachud, Booz Allen, Booz Allen, Booz Allen's, Meena Vijay Khetan, Leeman, ¦

PRODUCT: Respondent No.1, Respondent No.1, Respondent No.1

ORDINAL: Secondly, Secondly, first, second, first, second, third, first, second, first, first, Secondly, first, first, first, first, third

GPE: Mumbai, Bhilai, Jabalpur, Counsel, SBP, SBP, SBP, SBP, SBP, Halsbury

PERCENT: 50%

FAC: Laxmi Centre

EVENT: the 1996 Act

NORP: Rules