Semantic Analysis by spaCy
M/S Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-i and Another
Decided On : Apr-11-2014
Court : Mumbai Goa
LAW: Section 7A of the Employees Provident Fund, the PF Act, Section 2(f, Section 7A, the PF Act, Section 2(A, Section 7A of the PF Act, the PF Act, Section 7A, Section 7A of the PF Act, the Enforcement Officers, Section 7A of the Act, Section 7A of the Provident Fund Act, Section 7A of the Act, Section 7A of the Act
CARDINAL: 1, 1.7.2013, Six, five hundred and thirty, 261, 30, 2, 1.7.2013, 3., 4., 1.7.2013, 5, 6, 8.3.2013, 8, 2009(4, 240, 9, 10, 11, 1.7.2013 one, 12, 13, 14, 15, seven, 16, 172, 17, 18, 19, 2006(3, 20, 30, 21, 22, 1.7.2013, 23, 24
ORG: Employees Provident Fund, Appellate Tribunal, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (œthe Commissioner, the Employees Provident Fund Scheme, the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Regional Provident Fund, Regional Office, Civil Court, Tribunal, Guala Closures(India, Tribunal, Court, Disciplinary Authority, Rani Lakshmi Bai, Kshetriya Gramin Bank Vs, Tribunal, Tribunal, Hon'ble Apex Court, Disciplinary Authority, M/s Guala Closures, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, this High Court, Tribunal, Disciplinary Authority, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Enforcement Officers, the Commissioner, Workers Union, Goa Trade and Workers Union, the Regional Provident Fund Scheme, Court, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Provident Fund Commissioner, Calcutta High Court, the Provident Fund Scheme, Food Corporation India, the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Writ Petition
GPE: New Delhi, New Delhi, Single, Miramar
DATE: 1952, October, 2000, August 2008, 1952, a period of, seven days, 2012, the year 1997, 1952, 1952
PERSON: Goa, C. R. 816, Sharan Varshney, Ranisati, Ranisati, Panaji, Calcutta Vs
ORDINAL: first, Second
FAC: Assam Biri Factories(supra