Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vishwanath Vs. Pandurang

Decided On : Apr-11-2014

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

LAW: the Partition Deed

CARDINAL: 1, 261, 2000, 2., 56 and 57, 5.83, 51, half, 2.92, 2.91, 3., 4., 56 and 57, 5, 2, 6, 51, two, 51, 8, 56 and, 2.77, 3.06, 5.83, 2.92, 2.91, 1, 9, two, two, two, 51, 10

ORDINAL: 11th, second

DATE: October 2011, 21st June 2004, east-west, 11th June 2008, 57, nullah., the 1st

LOC: the Adhoc District

ORG: the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Wardha, Written Statement, Court, Learned 1st Appellate Court, Court, Court, the Deed of Partition, area &ldquo, Party No., the North : Government Shio, Court, Court, Court, Court

PERSON: Hiwara, Tahsil Sevagram, District Wardha, Pandurang, Vishwanath, Pandurang, Pandurang, nullah, Substantial Questions

WORK_OF_ART: Partition Deed, Partition Deed, Partition Deed

PRODUCT: Partition Deed

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //