Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Vishwanath Vs. Pandurang
Decided On : Apr-11-2014
Court : Mumbai Nagpur
LAW: the Partition Deed
CARDINAL: 1, 261, 2000, 2., 56 and 57, 5.83, 51, half, 2.92, 2.91, 3., 4., 56 and 57, 5, 2, 6, 51, two, 51, 8, 56 and, 2.77, 3.06, 5.83, 2.92, 2.91, 1, 9, two, two, two, 51, 10
ORDINAL: 11th, second
DATE: October 2011, 21st June 2004, east-west, 11th June 2008, 57, nullah., the 1st
LOC: the Adhoc District
ORG: the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Wardha, Written Statement, Court, Learned 1st Appellate Court, Court, Court, the Deed of Partition, area &ldquo, Party No., the North : Government Shio, Court, Court, Court, Court
PERSON: Hiwara, Tahsil Sevagram, District Wardha, Pandurang, Vishwanath, Pandurang, Pandurang, nullah, Substantial Questions
WORK_OF_ART: Partition Deed, Partition Deed, Partition Deed
PRODUCT: Partition Deed